ding76uk
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 4,096
- Name
- Carl
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Nicely put.
One taken which adds to the wealth of our diverse culture. The other driven by an artless consumer market.
Surely Pap photography is a lot more relevant to out celeb driven culture from a historical standpoint than another shot of people kissing (no offence Fabs) that offers no social commentary and is a reshoot of a classic photo from a previous era?
There is no difference in street and pap photography, just that pap are sometimes in your face about it than street photographers, although not always.
Those who say there is a difference, what about this situation. You work for a mag, they want to do a feature on Street photography and have asked you to get some photos for it. Surely you are just papping members of the public?
If you get down to the bolts of it the definition (they vary of course) is
Paparazzi /pɑːpəˈrɑːtsi/ (singular: (m) Paparazzo Italian: [papaˈɾattso] or (f) Paparazza) is an Italian term used to refer to photojournalists who specialize in candid photography of celebrities, politicians, and other prominent people. Paparazzi tend to be independent contractors, unaffiliated with a mainstream media organization.[1]
Street photography is the same thing. Getting paid is irrelevant.
What would you class this guy as? Street photographer, same thing as paps, some give a lot a bad name.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRBARi09je8&feature=related
