d00d
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 9,095
- Name
- David
- Edit My Images
- Yes
You'll probably use the silent Electronic Shutter most of the time won't you? I do. And I don't think that adds to the shutter count.
"Panasonic G series" Owners Thread
- Thread starter hillwalkinggirl
- Start date
AndrewFlannigan
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 11,977
- Edit My Images
- No
I've never felt the need to add anything to my G9, other than a couple of spare batteries.
Mind you, the G9 is one of those cameras that just suits me. I took this shot with the shop's demonstrator before I even bought my own G9!
Mind you, the G9 is one of those cameras that just suits me. I took this shot with the shop's demonstrator before I even bought my own G9!
- Messages
- 43,206
- Name
- Alan
- Edit My Images
- No
I usually leave my cameras set to switch between electronic and manual shutters automatically so they switch at 1/4,000. I don't generally use the electronic shutter below 1/4,000 unless making a conscious decision to use the camera silently as there's the risk of banding if there's any flickering artificial lighting. There's also the risk of rolling shutter effects but to be honest I've never worried about that as I don't tend to take pictures which could be affected.
FotoTaker27
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 6
- Name
- Brian Ronald Pritchard
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Hi all, I have had some problems with my GH4 with the shutter sticking so have had to revert to electronic shutter. Which is ok most of the time. I was not looking forward to the bill to have it repaired then I learned to bang it on your thigh. Low and behold a fully working shutter and no problems since.
d00d
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 9,095
- Name
- David
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Thanks, must remember that!
- Messages
- 43,206
- Name
- Alan
- Edit My Images
- No
AndrewFlannigan
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 11,977
- Edit My Images
- No
Indeed.
I feel that the second best feature on the G9 is the button which locks the mode dial. The best feature, in my opinion, is that marvelous viewfinder! It makes photographing rapid movement so much easier for me.
FotoTaker27
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 6
- Name
- Brian Ronald Pritchard
- Edit My Images
- Yes
woof woof, in the Airforce that was called the Impact Rectification Technique. hit it with a hammer it will work. I used to hit a Vulcan Bomber several times a day.
- Messages
- 43,206
- Name
- Alan
- Edit My Images
- No
Does anyone have either of these two lenses?
For my M43 I have the 45-175 HD and the Leica 12-60 lens that came with my G9 (and this 12-32 mm that came with the new GX9).
Watched a few videos on these and they could be the perfect pair of lenses, possibly all I would need really. The 45-175 mm I got for when we go to local wildlife places just to give a little zoom and the 12-60 is the one that typically stays on the G9. I am going to try the 45-175 for taking pictures of the dog on the weekend, weather permitting, but most of my photos are family, snaps of places and the dog (think I have more of the dog lol).
When I had my M50 I typically used the 22 mm pancake lens on it - what are the 20 mm 1.7 lenses like? I see sigma do a 16mm 1.4 but I assume its quite large.
Panasonic 12-35mm f2.8 II LUMIX G X Vario ASPH Power OIS Lens | Wex Photo Video
www.wexphotovideo.com
Panasonic 35-100mm f2.8 II LUMIX G X VARIO POWER O.I.S. Lens | Wex Photo Video
www.wexphotovideo.com
For my M43 I have the 45-175 HD and the Leica 12-60 lens that came with my G9 (and this 12-32 mm that came with the new GX9).
Watched a few videos on these and they could be the perfect pair of lenses, possibly all I would need really. The 45-175 mm I got for when we go to local wildlife places just to give a little zoom and the 12-60 is the one that typically stays on the G9. I am going to try the 45-175 for taking pictures of the dog on the weekend, weather permitting, but most of my photos are family, snaps of places and the dog (think I have more of the dog lol).
When I had my M50 I typically used the 22 mm pancake lens on it - what are the 20 mm 1.7 lenses like? I see sigma do a 16mm 1.4 but I assume its quite large.
Last edited:
- Messages
- 43,206
- Name
- Alan
- Edit My Images
- No
I have the original 12-35mm f2.8 but not the II.
PS.
I've had both the 20mm f1.7 I and II and saw no optical difference. They're nice lenses, compact and with good image quality and IMO nice bokeh the only downside being that they seem relatively slow to focus, the Olympus 17mm f1.8 being significantly faster.
I seem to remember something about continuous focusing being an issue but I could be wrong, maybe someone can confirm or deny? Plus years back with the early cameras there was talk of this lens being the cause of a noise like effect at higher ISO's with older bodies but not due to the usual ISO noise... which all sounds odd and I haven't seen any evidence of this with later cameras so if it ever was a real issue it may have been cured with newer bodies,
I have a MK1 on my GM5.
PS.
I've had both the 20mm f1.7 I and II and saw no optical difference. They're nice lenses, compact and with good image quality and IMO nice bokeh the only downside being that they seem relatively slow to focus, the Olympus 17mm f1.8 being significantly faster.
I seem to remember something about continuous focusing being an issue but I could be wrong, maybe someone can confirm or deny? Plus years back with the early cameras there was talk of this lens being the cause of a noise like effect at higher ISO's with older bodies but not due to the usual ISO noise... which all sounds odd and I haven't seen any evidence of this with later cameras so if it ever was a real issue it may have been cured with newer bodies,
I have a MK1 on my GM5.
Last edited:
AndrewFlannigan
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 11,977
- Edit My Images
- No
Do I believe such a story?
No, I really don't think I do.
Anyway, here's a Vulcan, which I doubt was hit with a hammer very often, if at all...
- Messages
- 10,200
- Name
- Brian
- Edit My Images
- Yes
You can hear the Howl.Do I believe such a story?
No, I really don't think I do.
Anyway, here's a Vulcan, which I doubt was hit with a hammer very often, if at all...
View attachment 354842
tijuana taxi
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 15,748
- Name
- Rich
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Had those two, but both were replaced with an Olympus 12-100, i'm not one for much lens changing.Does anyone have either of these two lenses?
Panasonic 12-35mm f2.8 II LUMIX G X Vario ASPH Power OIS Lens | Wex Photo Video
www.wexphotovideo.com
Panasonic 35-100mm f2.8 II LUMIX G X VARIO POWER O.I.S. Lens | Wex Photo Video
www.wexphotovideo.com
Also used an Olympus 12-40 on my GX9 until the 12-45 appeared, the latter makes for a very nice combo.
One other lens usually comes with me should I need it for low light stuff and that is the Panasonic 15/1.7
Will probably get the 9/1.7 when its released, although I do already have the 8-18, decisions, decisions?
- Messages
- 43,206
- Name
- Alan
- Edit My Images
- No
I was comparing the save speeds of my cameras yesterday and I was surprised how much difference a new faster SD card makes... It's almost night and day and the cameras are little sports cars wit the faster card 
I'm not a machine gunner but it still makes such a difference so I'm off to order 4 new ones
I'm not a machine gunner but it still makes such a difference so I'm off to order 4 new ones 
MK1 Photography
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 2,252
- Name
- Mark D
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Any Panasonic owner's I have just got the Olympus 9mm Body cap lens. Amazing if you have light!
AMcUK
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 767
- Edit My Images
- No
The Olympus 9mm Body cap lens is an absurdly good toy for the money - it's so small it pops in the pocket of a camera bag (or jacket). I got mine for about £50 and it's all the fisheye lens I'm ever going to want.
Examples here - but all Olympus so I won't clutter a Panny thread
flic.kr
MPB have one for £55+P&P
www.mpb.com
Examples here - but all Olympus so I won't clutter a Panny thread
Olympus f8.0 9mm Body Cap Lens
Images taken with the Olympus Body Cap Lens 9mm 1:8.0 or f8.0
flic.kr
MPB have one for £55+P&P
Used Olympus 9mm f/8 lens - mpb.com
Find used Olympus 9mm f/8 lenses for sale at mpb.com, or sell or trade your own
- Messages
- 10,200
- Name
- Brian
- Edit My Images
- Yes
What cards are we talking about?I was comparing the save speeds of my cameras yesterday and I was surprised how much difference a new faster SD card makes... It's almost night and day and the cameras are little sports cars wit the faster card
I'm on Sandisk Extreme Pro 170mb/s.
- Messages
- 10,200
- Name
- Brian
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I just wait for them to be on sale on Amazon and use some vouchers I get to buy a few now and again. I've got a couple of the 64gb ones but most are the 32 GB ones (does me).
When I go to Disney next year I'm just going to buy 5/6 of the Scandisk extreme pro ones (happy with 32 GB if they are cheap) to take with me
When I go to Disney next year I'm just going to buy 5/6 of the Scandisk extreme pro ones (happy with 32 GB if they are cheap) to take with me
Last edited:
- Messages
- 43,206
- Name
- Alan
- Edit My Images
- No
I've been mostly using class 4 cards but I don't know how fast they are. I do have one Sandisk class 10 which says it does up to 120mb/s and it really speeds things up so I've ordered 4 more to fit them to all my cameras.
I almost never set the cameras to continuous shooting but I have noticed that sometimes I have to wait quite a while to review pictures and that can be a bit irritating. These newer cards will cure that. I checked the one I have in all my cameras with continuous shooting and it speeds things up wonderfully with a whole string of shots clearing faster than just one or two with the old cards so these will be easily fast enough for my Sony A7 which is 24mp and Panasonic cameras which are either 16 or 20mp.
It really did surprise me how much faster the class 10 card is.
MK1 Photography
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 2,252
- Name
- Mark D
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I got mine on flea bay for £60 needed to try something very wide and fisheye a bit and absolutely loving itVery nice Mark.
I haven't got one of those. I have an Olympus 9-18mm but mostly use primes, at the mo the 14mm f2.5 seems to be my favourite. I'm going to read up on that 9mm though
What's the Olympus 9-18mm like? Price / performance
Sangoma
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 2,951
- Name
- Steve, Coventry, England
- Edit My Images
- Yes
It's always a goo idea to take multiple small cards and change every day if possible, especially if you have no way of backing them up, then if you mislay one (or your camera gets liberated), you don't lose everything.
It might be worth looking at CPC Farnell for cards, I buy all mine from them, they seem resonably priced, and delivery is quick and free (order over £19 I think for free delivery)
Snapsh0t
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 2,709
- Name
- Jonathan
- Edit My Images
- No
Yeah, class 4 cards were probably current then.Posting the above reminded me of when I worked for Systime and for a time fixed CDC SMD drives. My Gosh. How things have moved on
- Messages
- 43,206
- Name
- Alan
- Edit My Images
- No
Yeah, class 4 cards were probably current then.
If we'd seen one then we'd have thought it was made by aliens.
- Messages
- 43,206
- Name
- Alan
- Edit My Images
- No
I'm not sure what they go for these days as I've had my second hand one a long time but from what I remember the price was very reasonable. Image quality wise it's ok the main issues being the ho-hum aperture range and that it's collapsible which sort of irritates me
but I suppose being collapsible does help to make it smaller.People seem to go for the Panasonic equivalent but if you want something cheap, small and light I think it's probably worth looking at if you can live with the aperture range and it being collapsible. All in all I think it's probably a very decent choice at the price
- Messages
- 7,468
- Name
- Stephen
- Edit My Images
- No
I’m thinking of putting my Panasonic Leica 8-18 up for sale in favour of the new 9mm …
tijuana taxi
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 15,748
- Name
- Rich
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I thought about that too, but keep thinking do I really need a fast uwa lens.
Decided for now to keep the zoom mainly for the versatlity and the 8mm/2.8 is ok for night skies.
- Messages
- 7,468
- Name
- Stephen
- Edit My Images
- No
I find that, as with many zooms, I use the 8-18 either at 8mm or 18mm. The 18mm is covered by the 12-60 PanaLeica, and 9mm is not too far from 8mm but a darned sight lighter and less bulky, not to mention faster for when I get round to doing night skies. If I do need uwa, 9mm is perfect.