combat squirrel
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 1,201
- Edit My Images
- No
Long story short, iv been social sec of my local photography society for 2 years, and a new committee has just come in, all good.
However as with anything, at 1st there are many members and eventually they just leave and drift off and you end up with 8-10 of say 50 people who originally who turned up.
Now as the society was debating, it some became apparent it was somewhat one sided debate, and that only there way of running things would work.., basic ideas were:
- Diff theme every month (thats fine)...however they say that you HAVE to enter a shot for a certain theme within that month for submission for judging.....then they say, for example on month 4 you can enter any shot that fits that theme from any previous months, giving more scope apparently (all months themes will be provided from day 1), I think this is flawed, when you reach month 11/12, the last 2 months of a particular theme will only have so much experience in a theme, also if you take an awesome shot after the 1st few months that would of been a great entry for the previous months themes, its tough, you cant enter it again.
however I think it would be better to have all themes for each month from day 1, and each month you know what the theme is, and the society will hold 'classes and/or trips out' based on that theme, end of the year everyone submits a pic for each month at once, being able to access there entire collection of work from that year (much better imo) and then judging takes place at the end. - is it me or does that sound more helpful ?
Another thing......its so very militarized, the new society was all 'we will do this, and that on this day and that's that, within that theme, and we shall not deviate very much from that theme'....thinking that sticking to a theme will develop a certain camera technique.....I just see it totally boxing creativity.
Another example of what I didnt like was......the themes being to controlled, for example, one theme was 'Town', which I thought was ace, this could cover architecture, urban photography, sculpture, street photography etc, but the people in question were all 'no no, we will have architecture, and you can ONLY enter sculpture OR architecture, the reason being, ones arty and ones technical'
I really didnt agree with this, its ment to be an open society where people can express themselves its not a photography degree ffs,lol, I Much prefer the openness and creativity of just saying 'Town' as the theme......this all make sense ? lol
Anyways my point is, surely a shared interest group should be about meeting new people, sharing the 'art' of photography, and helping each other along, encouragement, and freedom of choice and expressionism. Not being so restricted, it almost came across as a power trip from the new committee, in that it will b there way and everyone will turn up with there work prepared, am I missing the point here?
A poll if possible ?
Option 1 : Very strict 'timetable' with the above weird way of entering pics for a competition, 'classes' each week and equipment stuff, very strict in what you can enter in regards to theme.
Option 2: A group who meets each week, discusses work, still of course organize trips out and what not.........but think about the photography and not 'grouping' people, freedom of speech, after all its ment to be a shared interest group.
I dunno....seems one ideas about camera enthusiast group; seems the other is about the art of photography itself..
Sorry for rant, just felt like its going to go all tits up and people will leave very very quickly.
However as with anything, at 1st there are many members and eventually they just leave and drift off and you end up with 8-10 of say 50 people who originally who turned up.
Now as the society was debating, it some became apparent it was somewhat one sided debate, and that only there way of running things would work.., basic ideas were:
- Diff theme every month (thats fine)...however they say that you HAVE to enter a shot for a certain theme within that month for submission for judging.....then they say, for example on month 4 you can enter any shot that fits that theme from any previous months, giving more scope apparently (all months themes will be provided from day 1), I think this is flawed, when you reach month 11/12, the last 2 months of a particular theme will only have so much experience in a theme, also if you take an awesome shot after the 1st few months that would of been a great entry for the previous months themes, its tough, you cant enter it again.
however I think it would be better to have all themes for each month from day 1, and each month you know what the theme is, and the society will hold 'classes and/or trips out' based on that theme, end of the year everyone submits a pic for each month at once, being able to access there entire collection of work from that year (much better imo) and then judging takes place at the end. - is it me or does that sound more helpful ?
Another thing......its so very militarized, the new society was all 'we will do this, and that on this day and that's that, within that theme, and we shall not deviate very much from that theme'....thinking that sticking to a theme will develop a certain camera technique.....I just see it totally boxing creativity.
Another example of what I didnt like was......the themes being to controlled, for example, one theme was 'Town', which I thought was ace, this could cover architecture, urban photography, sculpture, street photography etc, but the people in question were all 'no no, we will have architecture, and you can ONLY enter sculpture OR architecture, the reason being, ones arty and ones technical'
I really didnt agree with this, its ment to be an open society where people can express themselves its not a photography degree ffs,lol, I Much prefer the openness and creativity of just saying 'Town' as the theme......this all make sense ? lol
Anyways my point is, surely a shared interest group should be about meeting new people, sharing the 'art' of photography, and helping each other along, encouragement, and freedom of choice and expressionism. Not being so restricted, it almost came across as a power trip from the new committee, in that it will b there way and everyone will turn up with there work prepared, am I missing the point here?
A poll if possible ?
Option 1 : Very strict 'timetable' with the above weird way of entering pics for a competition, 'classes' each week and equipment stuff, very strict in what you can enter in regards to theme.
Option 2: A group who meets each week, discusses work, still of course organize trips out and what not.........but think about the photography and not 'grouping' people, freedom of speech, after all its ment to be a shared interest group.
I dunno....seems one ideas about camera enthusiast group; seems the other is about the art of photography itself..
Sorry for rant, just felt like its going to go all tits up and people will leave very very quickly.
