Only you can decide

u8myufo

u8myufo

Suspended / Banned
Messages
19,354
Name
Rich
Edit My Images
Yes
But I know what my thoughts are.


 
Who can say. That's the trouble with their profession. You can't tell if they are genuine, or not.
 
It could be innocent or it could as some others have suggested be methanol, as snorting methanol is so some say a good way to cry on demand.

I haven't really followed this and both of them may be very nice people but on the whole I'm glad I'm not married to or friends with people like them. Judgemental thing that I am :D
 
The thing is people like them are never going to be normal. They operate on a different plane of existence.
 
Decided, don’t care about either of them.
 
woof woof said:
It could be innocent or it could as some others have suggested be methanol, as snorting methanol is so some say a good way to cry on demand.

I haven't really followed this and both of them may be very nice people but on the whole I'm glad I'm not married to or friends with people like them. Judgemental thing that I am :D
Click to expand...


Methanol or menthol? BIG difference!!!
 
They are just people - same weaknesses, needs, hopes as the rest of us - but given stupid amounts of money and permission to make their own rules. Since Depp seems to have a history of not knocking his wives about, I'd consider she is a key part of the problem.
 
They are both professional actors, who knows if they are acting the part in court or not. I wouldn't like to have to decide who to believe & who not to believe.

To me they both seem flawed individuals who probably deserved each other.
 
Probably don't deserve each other - they are plainly deeply incompatible and mutually destructive.
 
Seen some of her acting in court and Pinocchio don’t come near to her
 
Amber seems like the new Karen. I'm not bothered about the case whatsoever, but like the Will Smith slap, it's unavoidable. From the bits I have seen she comes across as a right misery guts
 
Being the saddo I am I've watched most of the trial.

In my opinion Johny is fairly genuine but that woman is the daughter of satan.
Some of the evidence her team have shown has made her out to be a real witch never mind Johny's evidence.
Over and over she shoots herself in the foot and plays the hard done by card.
She seems manipulative and a genuine nasty woman who's tried everything to make out he's a monster whilst showing she actually is.
Even the judge has had to have words with her and her team.
Pretty funny she's fired her PR team, guess they didn't say the right thing.
 
ChrisH said:
Being the saddo I am I've watched most of the trial.

In my opinion Johny is fairly genuine but that woman is the daughter of satan.
Some of the evidence her team have shown has made her out to be a real witch never mind Johny's evidence.
Over and over she shoots herself in the foot and plays the hard done by card.
She seems manipulative and a genuine nasty woman who's tried everything to make out he's a monster whilst showing she actually is.
Even the judge has had to have words with her and her team.
Pretty funny she's fired her PR team, guess they didn't say the right thing.
Click to expand...

Lol Chris I do not think it`s a case of being a saddo or not, we can all have a particular interest in something while others may simply not. I have been keeping a tab on the live sessions on and off. Imho whatever Johnny does recreational wise the guy has a good soul as well as being very humble. despite past relationships afaik their stories point to him not having a bad bone in his body. I doubt very much any of us will know the whole story from either side though, they both grew up in similar circumstances with regards to abuse, he recognises that fact and walks away from the situation as much as he can, she on the otherhand has become the Narcissistic monster. What I do find interesting to watch is the way the legal system works, what you can say and what you cannot, what you can imply and so on. The way that evidence and testimonies are looked at by all sides, how even experts on the witness stand are grilled and attempts are made for them to slip up when being cross examined, mind you as mentioned her team seem about as useful as a handbrake on a canoe so far. Something else I heard while being discussed on a news panel with a couple of law experts, and that was it will only take one of the jurers to rule that she was the victim and he will lose the case, perhaps someone could clarify that if they are aware. We shall see what the outcome is all in good time :)
 
FB_IMG_1652441047514.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top