Sootchucker
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 2,824
- Name
- Andrew
- Edit My Images
- No
Some excellent images there Alf, and proof M43 can hold its own with most other formats.
Thanks for the quick reply. Before I buy new if anyone drops one into the classified section I'll look.Nissin i40. I had one briefly but sold it due to lack of use
The Nissin Di466 is cheap and easy to use.Has anyone a recommendation for a flash to use on my EM1 for a beginner to using flash?
Thanks for this link too.The Nissin Di466 is cheap and easy to use.
It is what I have and use it a lot for macro.
Edit with link added
http://www.jessops.com/online.store/products/83272/Show.html?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=PLA&utm_term=Di466 Flashgun for Four Thirds - Black&gclid=CI2xvZj3qscCFeXLtAodo1AM-Q
Lakeside 2015 (28 of 79) by Jonathan Crohill, on Flickr[/URL]The Nissin Di466 is cheap and easy to use.
It is what I have and use it a lot for macro.
Edit with link added
http://www.jessops.com/online.store/products/83272/Show.html?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=PLA&utm_term=Di466 Flashgun for Four Thirds - Black&gclid=CI2xvZj3qscCFeXLtAodo1AM-Q
Lakeside 2015 (66 of 79) by Jonathan Crohill, on Flickr[/URL]Many thanks, I'll look one outI have the Nissin i40 which works well with the Mk1 and the mk2

P8150244 by Superpippo0547, on Flickr
P8150241 by Superpippo0547, on Flickr
P8150233 by Superpippo0547, on Flickr
P8150181 by Superpippo0547, on FlickrAlso HDR I noticed it's kinda slow when you take a HDR shot, compared to other cameras I've has they were quick doing their 3 shots but this is kinda slow and can blur more easily, any settings here to speed that up?
come on dad! by nik-o 2012, on Flickr
just chilling by nik-o 2012, on FlickrAny 4/3 fit flash will work so you can get either a Di466 or Di40 flashesAre any of the Nissin flashes suitable for the EM5 Mk1? Thanks.
Any 4/3 fit flash will work so you can get either a Di466 or Di40 flashes

Most of the time I'm looking for great landscape pictures on the web I come across Full Frame cams. D800, 5D2, 6D as most common ones.
Is there any other benefit to it than resolution for big prints or cropping? I guess same age sensors have a little bit more potential in DR and ISO noise?
Background: I have an older Full Frame model from canon and my next destiantion is new zealand. Its a landscape photographers dream and i am pondering about switching to Olympus, because its appr. half the weight and I see many positiv reviews on the net up to "you wont see a difference/better than 5 year old full frame sensors" I can'Ät figure it out if its "good enough" for me - especially with the new handling and learning involved (I can use my equip with closed eyes most of the time).
The cheap one!Which 40-150?
The cheap one!
Lakeside 2015 (73 of 79) by Jonathan Crohill, on Flickr[/URL]Thinking of adding the 40-150 lens to the collection or the 100-300 how does image quality compare between the two, much in it?
Nice shot Glenn, do you prefer the 40-150 due to the smaller size over the 100-300 or is purely a more pleasing focal length for your needs?
dark clouds over west bay by damianmkv, on Flickr
chesil beach from portland by damianmkv, on Flickr
foggy fireworks by damianmkv, on Flickr
Watching us watching you by damianmkv, on Flickr
Bluebottle by Alf Branch, on Flickr
A fly 2 by Alf Branch, on Flickr
A fly by Alf Branch, on Flickr