No jail for nonces

POAH said:
but you don't know what kind of image it was..
Click to expand...

The article lists at what level the images were at.

The levels go from 1 through to 5 which is considered the highest level, he had pictures at all levels, so it would be safe to assume he had images of the most abhorrent and deprived kind

He also had moving pictures at level 3 and 4
 
boliston said:
I think more should be done to control the *source* of these images - who actually creates them initially and distributes them?
Click to expand...

people in third world s***holes where the law has lost its grip on crime (and i'm not talking about glasgow for once)
 
big soft moose said:
people in third world s***holes where the law has lost its grip on crime (and i'm not talking about glasgow for once)
Click to expand...
So as long as people keep pushing these images out there are going to be people who download them - a bit like drug pushers and drug users - there needs to be more international co-operation about shutting these operations down.
 
Keith W said:
The article lists at what level the images were at.

The levels go from 1 through to 5 which is considered the highest level, he had pictures at all levels, so it would be safe to assume he had images of the most abhorrent and deprived kind

He also had moving pictures at level 3 and 4
Click to expand...

ah right I did not know that - in that case I'm pretty surprised he didn't end up in prison
 
POAH said:
ah right I did not know that - in that case I'm pretty surprised he didn't end up in prison
Click to expand...

Well yes and no.

Don't forget we had all that fuss about the child abuse in the 70s and 80s allegedly involving high profile people who had been protected by the powers that be. That created a lot of heat and light for about two minutes. Now it all seems to have gone quiet. What happened to the enquiry that Butler-Sloss was chairing? She stepped down almost a month ago; who is her replacement? I don't recall hearing who it is, and when the enquiry will commence. It's all gone very quiet. I assume we'll have to wait as long for that enquiry as for the Chilcott Report to be released, so I'm guessing we'll never see it .

If the guy who is under discussion here was a DJ or similar, or even Joe Soap, he'd be banged up by now. But he isn't, so he wasn't.
 
POAH said:
ah right I did not know that - in that case I'm pretty surprised he didn't end up in prison
Click to expand...
He had 16 images on his computer 3 at level 5 and 3 videos. i think the sentence was appropriate in this case.
chadders said:
Well yes and no.

Don't forget we had all that fuss about the child abuse in the 70s and 80s allegedly involving high profile people who had been protected by the powers that be. That created a lot of heat and light for about two minutes. Now it all seems to have gone quiet. What happened to the enquiry that Butler-Sloss was chairing? She stepped down almost a month ago; who is her replacement? I don't recall hearing who it is, and when the enquiry will commence. It's all gone very quiet. I assume we'll have to wait as long for that enquiry as for the Chilcott Report to be released, so I'm guessing we'll never see it ..........
Click to expand...
Its a strange one the westminster inquiry, they still haven't chosen a new chair despite promising one within a week of Butler-sloss resigning
 
POAH said:
but you don't know what kind of image it was. it said indecent - now a picture of a 17 year old pulling her pants up to make a camel toe would be considered an indecent image of a minor. do you really think Jail is appropriate for that considering you could have sex with them? you don't know what the picture(s) are that are involved in that case so you can't make a judgement on wither the sentence is lenient or not.
Click to expand...
Read the article. They were c.10yo.
 
boliston said:
So as long as people keep pushing these images out there are going to be people who download them - a bit like drug pushers and drug users - there needs to be more international co-operation about shutting these operations down.
Click to expand...

difficult to control though - internet censorship is a big can of worms

also there is the fact that if you shut down the overseas operations nonces will just be 'forced' (if they can't control themselves) to get their jollies in the flesh.

if you really want to be sick, google nambla - don't do it at work (and don't click on any picture files - though if you leave safe search on that shouldnt be an issue). There's some sick puppies who want putting against the nearest wall in my opinion (and given that its in america i'm quite suprised they havent already been)
 
big soft moose said:
difficult to control though - internet censorship is a big can of worms......
Click to expand...

i would not class down shutting down a criminal operation as "censorship" - while i'm totally against any form of censorship im in favour of stopping criminal activity - presumably it is not legal to host these type of images on your web server?
 
ST4 said:
I'm glad you spared us, thank you
Click to expand...

If only you could extend us the same courtesy. Your endless threads about this and that are getting pretty tiresome.

It's such a shame this forum is becoming a shadow of what it was when I joined. I still pop in for a read every now and then but there has been a seismic shift in the type of posts I've seen being made.
 
TriggerHappy said:
If only you could extend us the same courtesy. Your endless threads about this and that are getting pretty tiresome.

It's such a shame this forum is becoming a shadow of what it was when I joined. I still pop in for a read every now and then but there has been a seismic shift in the type of posts I've seen being made.
Click to expand...

Endless threads about what? It's an off topic area. I don't see the issue. Given the number of replies to all my threads I believe you are mistaken.
 
boliston said:
i would not class down shutting down a criminal operation as "censorship" - while i'm totally against any form of censorship im in favour of stopping criminal activity - presumably it is not legal to host these type of images on your web server?
Click to expand...

I don't disagree per se - but the internet is practically impossible to police - the servers in question may be located anywhere in the world so actually geting them shut down is near enough impossible - hence the concentration on policing the end users
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top