If it’s a prime or a fast zoom, it will be quality. Nikon don’t make bad quality “fast glass”. Never saw the point in L lenses. Why bother making inferior products, just make them all L quality.
Price
Since the consumer grade DX stuff won't work then you should generally be OK with what does.]/QUOTE]
Not wishing to take issue with the intended meaning of this sentence but it could be somewhat misleading to a novice as a DX lens will function perfectly on the D700 - zoom, auto-focus, aperture, VR, etc., all work as intended. Just like other Nikon FX bodies the D700 will detect the lens is DX and switch to DX mode - your image will just occupy half of the sensor and be 6Mp instead of 12Mp in size.
There basically isn't one. At various times it's been suggested that Nikon's use of gold rings on the barrel, or ED glass, has been indicative of the 'high end' lenses; but neither of those are definitive. At the end of the day you just need to look at the specifications, the test results, and the price.Formely a Canon user and the glass to have was the L series , what is the Nikon equivalent
Actually it's a bit smaller than that. The Nikon DX crop factor is 1.5, so the FX frame is 1.5 x 1.5 = 2.25 times bigger than the DX frame. That means the DX images delivered by the D7200 are 12 / 2.25 = 5.33 megapixels.Just like other Nikon FX bodies the D700 will detect the lens is DX and switch to DX mode - your image will just occupy half of the sensor and be 6Mp instead of 12Mp in size.
Not wishing to take issue with the intended meaning of this sentence but it could be somewhat misleading to a novice as a DX lens will function perfectly on the D700 - zoom, auto-focus, aperture, VR, etc., all work as intended. Just like other Nikon FX bodies the D700 will detect the lens is DX and switch to DX mode - your image will just occupy half of the sensor and be 6Mp instead of 12Mp in size.