Nikon D750 & D780

I`m always the last one to know anything :(:(:(
Lol, I was only pulling your leg ;)

But as I mentioned on the other post, if there is any truth to the rumour that it'll be using the sensor from the D5 it won't be of any interest to me in the slightest, no matter what AF system they throw at it. I wouldn't want less MP or to take a huge step back in sensor performance (at least at base level up to 1600 ISO). That being said, just because they use the same sensor it doesn't mean that they don't apply different processing to give ti better base DR and noise handling.
 
I can't see a D750 replacement having less than 24mp.
I'd be surprised too, which is why I'm taking the rumour about it having the D5 sensor with a pinch of salt. I wondered if they might try and compete with the 5DIV, or whether they'll leave this up to the D8xxx. Just thought of something else I'd like on the D750 replacement, at least a half decent liveview, absolutely no excuse these days for having tardy AF in LV.
 
The D760 can have all the bells and whistles it wants. They won't tempt me to spend money on it. Not even if they're ones I'd like! :LOL:
 
I did look at the d5. But after a bit of reading and finding a good website that seem to have a good comparison of the d5 and the d750 I decided that I would not get a great deal of benefit from it.
 
I did look at the d5. But after a bit of reading and finding a good website that seem to have a good comparison of the d5 and the d750 I decided that I would not get a great deal of benefit from it.

OMG more GAS Sir[emoji12]
 
I did look at the d5. But after a bit of reading and finding a good website that seem to have a good comparison of the d5 and the d750 I decided that I would not get a great deal of benefit from it.

OMG more GAS Sir[emoji12]
 
I did look at the d5. But after a bit of reading and finding a good website that seem to have a good comparison of the d5 and the d750 I decided that I would not get a great deal of benefit from it.
If you need an insane buffer, insane FPS and slightly better AF then the D5 is worth consideration. If you want a camera that has significantly more DR (at base and lower ISO) and better noise performance, as well as saving you thousands of pounds and several hundred grams in weight then the D750 is a more sensible option (y)
 
If you need an insane buffer, insane FPS and slightly better AF then the D5 is worth consideration. If you want a camera that has significantly more DR (at base and lower ISO) and better noise performance, as well as saving you thousands of pounds and several hundred grams in weight then the D750 is a more sensible option (y)
And a touch screen.
No wifi.

The video I saw with the buffer was completely insane.

I did purely look at it as I have semi unlimited Xmas gift from the mil and other half.
 
And a touch screen.
No wifi.

The video I saw with the buffer was completely insane.

I did purely look at it as I have semi unlimited Xmas gift from the mil and other half.
Ahh, I always forget about touchscreen as I never use them. D500 would certainly make a great 2nd body.
 
What just cause I can [emoji1] [emoji1]

If I was going to get a 2nd body I'd probably get a d500
That's what I'm going to do in the new year, D500 for that extra reach and some macro shots [emoji106]
 
I've found the d500 can be a do it all camera from my experience am loving it. The DR is better the high ISO is more on par. It a brilliant camera. With the lens available these days it can be a one system setup [emoji106]
 
D750 I've had before [emoji108]
 
Don't want start anything folks. It just my opinion doesn't mean anyone else will agree [emoji106]
 
Don't want start anything folks. It just my opinion doesn't mean anyone else will agree [emoji106]
Just winging whining and a little bit of bitching thrown in for good measure in this thread lol
 
Ok so we`ve had the dogs shown here, well one since iv`e been here anyhow, here`s my in-laws cat, well one of them.
This is Tigret. (Shes French btw) lol
Its a hard life 2 by Graham on Flickr,
As the above shot has been mentioned as being a tad dark @snerkler Heres the improved shot, better?
Its a hard life 2 by Graham, on Flickr
 
Last edited:
And as I put a shot up here of where I live from the hillsin the daytime, heres another from yesterday morning @ about 6am, wtf I am crazy getting up at 4.45 am just to take a few Astro shots, it was bloody freezing out.

St Raphael at night by Graham, on Flickr
 
Like that very much. Seems a nice lens that 300mm
Yeah it is Andrew thanks, got it from Munchycarrot from here :)
Would have been sharper if I had used the tripod but this Cat dont like strange things.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top