70-200 2.8 shot at 160mm.Like that. What lens?
You'll get bored of macro @minnnt, I did and I'd bought a lens. Go for the 85
I like the colours and comp. Is this the kind of stuff you're aiming for then? What kind of togging are you doing atm?
Two separate businesses for a year to see which one works (and more importantly, which one I enjoy!).
One focusing on conferences and events. Really hoping to get involved in the F1, tennis, golf, triathlon etc. All major tournaments but with multiple smaller sponsors who hire in local photographers who (in my opinion) are often very poor.
The second being weddings and family stuff. Again only a couple in the city I can think of that I'd be happy with.
I'm taking it slowly at the minute though building up experience and confidence as I go. Luckily the mrs is cool with it or I might be in bother![]()
TBH it was more frost, snow and leaves i was thinking of with regards to macro but it would mainly be for portraits and landscapes.
I'd take the Nikon, if it was strictly for portraits. Also think about where you will be using it, if you may be shooting indoors where space can be an issue then the longer lens is not always better.So, I'm looking to add a portrait lens in a couple of weeks. Considering the Nikon 85mm f1.8 or the Sigma 105mm f2.8 OS. I've had the 85 before (twice!) but never the Sigma.
Any thoughts?
So, I'm looking to add a portrait lens in a couple of weeks. Considering the Nikon 85mm f1.8 or the Sigma 105mm f2.8 OS. I've had the 85 before (twice!) but never the Sigma.
Any thoughts?
So, I'm looking to add a portrait lens in a couple of weeks. Considering the Nikon 85mm f1.8 or the Sigma 105mm f2.8 OS. I've had the 85 before (twice!) but never the Sigma.
Any thoughts?
Inspiration by Paulie-W, on FlickrBetter put another pic up, as this thread is dropping down the page
Taken with the 35 art
Inspiration by Paulie-W, on Flickr
Well..well.... pulled the trigger on another D750 today, haven't got on with my attempt at giving up DSLR for mirrorless at all.... missing Nikon I have to say, the Fuji XT1 is probably perfect, great grip, great size and brilliant lenses but I struggled with 16mp and the X-Trans RAW's, I will certainly have one again at some point though when I can afford my Nikon Kit and a mirrorless setup. Sony A7ii, nice IQ but nowhere near as nice to use as the full size Nikon, I found it quite fiddly to use and very disappointed with the lenses in the "normal" range (24-70 really),
D750 coming this week (although it was almost a D810....) and I've already got a replacement Tamron 24-70 that I traded with someone yesterday, but I think after 3 years of using Nikon (D7000/D600/D800 & D750) I think I've found my photographic "home" that fits my needs.
Going to try and keep it simple though, 24-70 really more for my landscaping than anything but aside from that all other "normal" lenses will be primes (20 f1.8 / 24 f1.8) ad probably just another 50 f1.8G, looking forward to getting a D750 in my hands again!
Well..well.... pulled the trigger on another D750 today, haven't got on with my attempt at giving up DSLR for mirrorless at all.... missing Nikon I have to say, the Fuji XT1 is probably perfect, great grip, great size and brilliant lenses but I struggled with 16mp and the X-Trans RAW's, I will certainly have one again at some point though when I can afford my Nikon Kit and a mirrorless setup. Sony A7ii, nice IQ but nowhere near as nice to use as the full size Nikon, I found it quite fiddly to use and very disappointed with the lenses in the "normal" range (24-70 really),
D750 coming this week (although it was almost a D810....) and I've already got a replacement Tamron 24-70 that I traded with someone yesterday, but I think after 3 years of using Nikon (D7000/D600/D800 & D750) I think I've found my photographic "home" that fits my needs.
Going to try and keep it simple though, 24-70 really more for my landscaping than anything but aside from that all other "normal" lenses will be primes (20 f1.8 / 24 f1.8) ad probably just another 50 f1.8G, looking forward to getting a D750 in my hands again!
Lmfao. Brilliant.
Nikon is where you belong. Like me. Nothing else really works for me and like you, i struggled with the RAW's in Lr from the Fooj.
The 24-70 is a great range.
I'd just get the Nikon, you would spend ages wondering whether you;d made the right choice if you went for the Tamron. Plus not as much difference in it second hand and you won't lose much on it should you resell!I tried the Fuji a while ago and had similar experiences. its good but not quite there for me yet.
Interesting that you have gone back to the Tamron, weighing up a Nikon 24-70 or the Tamron. Significant savings which would allow me to put a couple of hundred £ into additional equipment. A little concerned about getting a soft copy though.
Interesting. It would be nice to see how well the D810 and A7RII compared to the D750 after they were downsampled to 24mp, I bet there wouldn't be much in it. I also had a quick look at the D7200 on that link and really impressed with how well that copes in the DR latitude test.If some of you have not seen this yet, DPReview published the A7RII DR latitude results. If you use their studio scene tool, you can compare 4 cameras at ISO100 with 0 to +6EV exposure push with +1Ev increments. I used the A7RII, D750, D810 and 5DSR.
Studio scene test tool - http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/son...tm_campaign=generic&ref_=pe_1822230_152102580
In terms of sharpness and detail at 0-+1EV the 5DSR smokes them all followed by A7RII, D810 and D750
In terms of sharpness alone the results are similar although at +5EV and up, the 5DSR looks mess in very low light areas.
In terms of actual DR latitude, the D750 smokes them all followed y D810, A7RII and 5DSR.
In the ISO invariance test you can compare the same cameras to see what happens if you shoot a scene with low ISO 100 and then push up to 6 stops (ISO 6400 simulated) against shooting the same with ISO 6400. The ISO 6400 shots will obviously look much better compared to ISO 100 + 6 stops. But this test shows how much you can push the DR with if you have mistakenly used a lower ISO and have to push the EV by 6 stops. In this case also the results are similar and D750 smokes them all
This may not be interesting for many here but those who use the D750 for weddings, street, events etc in challenging lighting conditions, should be happy to have the best camera in your hand when it comes to DR. Well, you guys know this as a fact anyway, but try the comparison and you will see some interesting results across the studio scene with different light levels.
I am waiting for the Nikon Winter cashback announcement next week to see if they offer any good discount on a D750 and then decide whether I'd go for UK stock or grey.
And keep posting the nice pictures.
I know and that makes the D810 such a great camera. I wish it was bit cheaper for my pocket and bit lighterInteresting. It would be nice to see how well the D810 and A7RII compared to the D750 after they were downsampled to 24mp, I bet there wouldn't be much in it.
Better put another pic up, as this thread is dropping down the page
Taken with the 35 art
Inspiration by Paulie-W, on Flickr
yeah, f*** fuji.Lmfao. Brilliant.
Nikon is where you belong. Like me. Nothing else really works for me and like you, i struggled with the RAW's in Lr from the Fooj.
The 24-70 is a great range.
Lmfao. Brilliant.
Nikon is where you belong. Like me. Nothing else really works for me and like you, i struggled with the RAW's in Lr from the Fooj.
The 24-70 is a great range.
I tried the Fuji a while ago and had similar experiences. its good but not quite there for me yet.
Interesting that you have gone back to the Tamron, weighing up a Nikon 24-70 or the Tamron. Significant savings which would allow me to put a couple of hundred £ into additional equipment. A little concerned about getting a soft copy though.
I wont say I told you so about the A series.![]()
Same here, Ive pretty much tried em all and Im happiest with the D750 and Nikon overall as my main system, GAS makes us do some really stupid moves sometimes!
Ive gotten myself a used A7 + Zeiss 55 again as it was cheap, not good enough to replace my D750 but if I use it within its limits as a grab n go and dont try compare it to my D750 then its pretty good, have had some very nice results from it.
TBH it was more frost, snow and leaves i was thinking of with regards to macro but it would mainly be for portraits and landscapes.