Livin The Dream
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 4,608
- Name
- Kris
- Edit My Images
- No
Dies it clean oil / pollen? Seems a dab job that dust just sticks to?
Yep, that's pretty much it. Oil would still be a swab job.
Dies it clean oil / pollen? Seems a dab job that dust just sticks to?
Yep, that's pretty much it. Oil would still be a swab job.
I've had both Rob and i can't say i noticed much difference in IQ. F2.8 and a non extending (visable) barrel are what made the 24-70 a winner for me. It's heavier and you could probably kill someone with it but the 24-120 is a nice lens aswell.
If you were thinking a 24-70 for your landscape & wildlife then the 24-120 is just going to give you more options ... it is my go-to general purpose/walkabout lens and never fails to satisfy![]()
I have both - although the 24-120 f/4 is only about 6 weeks in my possession. I bought one from classifieds on here having owned the 24-70 f2.8 for around 7 years, and I have no plans to sell. I'm fortunate enough to be able to have both and I got the 24-120mm as a good walkabout/travel lens rather than needing to have the 24-70mm and 70-200mm when I know 120mm is going to be fine at the long end.
It compares favourably and with the extending barrel the only major downside it is certainly a good lens and at the seemingly usual price of about £420-50 on classifieds here a real bargain.
IIRC this lens is sold as a kit on some of the bodies, and I'm assuming the quantity sold is more to do with those being separated either because they already own them, or have an alternative - not because of the quality.
Always worth pointing out that the new f/4 is a far better lens than it's predecessor with the variable aperture which was a bit of a dog.
Looks alright, I'm using a sensorklear for dust and it works well. May look into the gel stick for next time. Thanks

Another from last night. Was quite lucky to get this shot. I saw the lorry coming but i was far from ready.
A light dusting of Autumn... by David Raynham, on Flickr
Thanks mate. Looking at it now i can't decide if it's too sodding purple. FFFFFFFFFFFFFFS!!!!
![]()
...and some wildlife....
Uh oh. Hope she's fully approved it?! Interested to see what you make of the 50.
I have the 24-120 and it really is a great range, but unless you can get really close or its something big I would question if they're really much use for wildlife, well unless its a pigeon or a hungry squirrel![]()
In my experience it's always better to beg forgiveness than ask permission [emoji6]
She knew I was trialling Gary's d750. She might not be totally expecting the extra lens though!! I have however done some extra work to pay for this expense so all is good!!
I've been using the 50 f1.8g a lot so I'm keen to use it wide open - always stop the f1.8 down to f2 or smaller.
Might have to sell some lenses now though!!
Same here with my 50 1.8G. It's not too hot wide open. I think at some point I may go more for the 58 but I shall have to put a few extra shifts in for that. Going to have to pay for the spare body before I even think about another lens.
In my experience it's always better to beg forgiveness than ask permission [emoji6]
I like your approach to domestic bliss - similar to mine....
Nice one @Sir SR you will love it! Really enjoying my D750 at the moment.
Personally I would much rather the Sigma 50 than the Nikon 58, every shot I see looks like it's out of focus. Love it or hate it I guess...
Welcome aboard Shaheed.
At least you're not without a camera.
Likewise, although I don't tend to change ISO much when shooting so can't say it's ever been much of an issue for me.I have mine set to white writing on a black background which is less imposing.
Good to hear Andy. I'm having a bit of a debate atm on what to get with regards to a UWA.
Tokina 16-28
Samyang 14mm
Sigma 12-24mm
They all appeal for different reasons.
The Tokina because it's a nice range and has an f2.8 aperture.you bought, darling?"
The Samyang because it's the lightest with a fast aperture. It's also the cheapest.
And the Sigma because 12mm is insane. Not the fastest lens but a good price.
Thoughts?

Sigma, you don't need a fast lens unless doing astrophotography?Good to hear Andy. I'm having a bit of a debate atm on what to get with regards to a UWA.
Tokina 16-28
Samyang 14mm
Sigma 12-24mm
They all appeal for different reasons.
The Tokina because it's a nice range and has an f2.8 aperture.
The Samyang because it's the lightest with a fast aperture. It's also the cheapest.
And the Sigma because 12mm is insane. Not the fastest lens but a good price.
Thoughts?
Sayang 14mm arrived this morning, bought though Amazon as I'd read some dodgy reviews about Eglobalcentral. Feels well made and the optics look good so far.
Manual focus isn't an issue.
Can't wait to for my weekend in Glencoe and then another weekend in Northumberland 2 weeks later to really give it good testing
Cheers.
I'll have to have a look at that option when I go my replacement.I have mine set to white writing on a black background which is less imposing.