Have you tried Panamoz. Sorry couldn't resist it! LOLso after all this, anyone got a cheap, faulty D750 for sale?

I figured somebody would have a black band 750 for sale,cheap. I don't look for problems, I look for ways around them, this camera could be a great compliment to the 800 for what I do.Have you tried Panamoz. Sorry couldn't resist it! LOL![]()
I figured somebody would have a black band 750 for sale,cheap. I don't look for problems, I look for ways around them, this camera could be a great compliment to the 800 for what I do.
750 looks attractive, or another 800, not sure yet.no you don't!
the lens is what matters in what you do
at the back of my mind that it had been faulty and I never really trusted it after that.
I am of a similar opinion.I would like a D750 but I want to check it for the light leak flare problem in the shop first it saves hassle later.Thumbs up to Panamoz for service, refunded my money today despite the camera not making it back to HK yet. As for buying another, I was sufficiently impressed (in the short time I had it) to want a replacement, but will be buying from a UK brick and mortar store where I can exchange it quickly if there's an issue.
How do send it back for a replacement six months down the road when you find the defect?I've got an 201xxxx one, purchased from Pan and although I haven't, and don't see the point in, shinning a torch directly into the body, I haven't noticed any issues when shooting real world backlit scenes with the 50mm 1.8g. If the issue does appear, guess what, I'll send it back and get a replacement, not a big deal in my opinion. Personally, I think people without the camera shouldn't be posting on the issue, it's getting blown way out of proportion by people who don't have any firsthand experience of the kit and or issue. Read about it, sure, ask questions, no problem with that, but please stop ranting about how bad the problem is, when your views are not based on any actual experience with this camera. Rant over, off to snap Christmas with the D750 and my new 18-35 - going to be fun![]()
OK, the sun showed its face today and I took the opportunity to take a couple of images that I think illustrate the problem. Both taken with Nikon 50mm 1.8G lens @ F8 with lens hood fitted. The first image shows the "banding" and flare that I believe everyone is talking about, even if they don't own the camera and haven't experienced it at first hand. The sun is well out of frame in that image. The second image has the sun only just out of frame at the top of the roofs. No banding. So, it isn't necessary to have the sun (or a torch) in the frame and it doesn't get worse the close the sun gets to edge of frame - Quite the contrary. Of course it's a rubbish image converted from raw with no PP, but does serve to show the problem. Is it acceptable? - That's up to the owner I guess. I don't like it for sure.
![]()
![]()
OK, the sun showed its face today and I took the opportunity to take a couple of images that I think illustrate the problem. Both taken with Nikon 50mm 1.8G lens @ F8 with lens hood fitted. The first image shows the "banding" and flare that I believe everyone is talking about, even if they don't own the camera and haven't experienced it at first hand. The sun is well out of frame in that image. The second image has the sun only just out of frame at the top of the roofs. No banding. So, it isn't necessary to have the sun (or a torch) in the frame and it doesn't get worse the close the sun gets to edge of frame - Quite the contrary. Of course it's a rubbish image converted from raw with no PP, but does serve to show the problem. Is it acceptable? - That's up to the owner I guess. I don't like it for sure.
![]()
![]()
Camera
NIKON D750
Focal Length
50mm
Aperture
f/8
Exposure
1/320s
ISO
200
Already contacted Nikon "customer support team" by telephone yesterday and escalated issue. To paraphrase, the response was "It's a characteristic of the D750, not a defect". "We had a few in a while back, but it can't be fixed so there's no point in attempting to rectify yours".
Already contacted Nikon "customer support team" by telephone yesterday and escalated issue. To paraphrase, the response was "It's a characteristic of the D750, not a defect". "We had a few in a while back, but it can't be fixed so there's no point in attempting to rectify yours".
I can't see any point in me trying to get past this response with Nikon, so I am taking it up with the retailer. If this is indeed a characteristic of all D750's then I want to return for credit. If it can be exchanged for a "good" one then fine.
So this remains open for now.
If you don't mind I'd rather not say where I bought it right now, suffice to say they are a well known retailer in the South. I have only just bought it up with them and I believe they are anxious to resolve the problem one way or another. I will be trying out another two more recent bodies next week, so it'll be interesting to see if they exhibit this "characteristic".
OK, the sun showed its face today and I took the opportunity to take a couple of images that I think illustrate the problem. Both taken with Nikon 50mm 1.8G lens @ F8 with lens hood fitted. The first image shows the "banding" and flare that I believe everyone is talking about, even if they don't own the camera and haven't experienced it at first hand. The sun is well out of frame in that image. The second image has the sun only just out of frame at the top of the roofs. No banding. So, it isn't necessary to have the sun (or a torch) in the frame and it doesn't get worse the close the sun gets to edge of frame - Quite the contrary. Of course it's a rubbish image converted from raw with no PP, but does serve to show the problem. Is it acceptable? - That's up to the owner I guess. I don't like it for sure.
![]()
![]()
No problem, the only reason I ask is because some members are convinced its only grey imports suffering from the issue, which is ridiculous. Good luck with the other cameras.
Already contacted Nikon "customer support team" by telephone yesterday and escalated issue. To paraphrase, the response was "It's a characteristic of the D750, not a defect". "We had a few in a while back, but it can't be fixed so there's no point in attempting to rectify yours".
I can't see any point in me trying to get past this response with Nikon, so I am taking it up with the retailer. If this is indeed a characteristic of all D750's then I want to return for credit. If it can be exchanged for a "good" one then fine.
So this remains open for now.
I would phone them again and ask that you speak with the Manager stating that you are not happy with the response. I'd follow it up with an email and attach your photographs. Good luck.
From reading the thread, IMHO, this place is not appropriate if you want an sensible assessment of the Nikon D750 …… the thread is all over the place ….. with no consistent sense of logic ….. you would be far better putting numbers on and establishing how many of you have a D750 and what the problems are
The issue with any poll on a forum like this is that people are far more likely to respond if they have an issue, so it's not really going to tell you anything that this thread hasn't.
You then have the significant variable that some are intentionally trying to force the problem, some have experienced it in real world shooting, some have tried and failed to cause the issue, and then you have people like me who have absolutely no interest in trying to replicate it, so are not likely to ever know if their camera is 'faulty' or not.
Anyhow, I'm going to call it a day on here for now, enjoy taking photos of my family and newborn son over Christmas on my D750 (which is superb for capturing a very wriggly little boy in low light by the way), then shoot a wedding with it just after Christmas. If I have any issues I will report back, heaven forbid I might even post some nice sample photos from it as well.
I used my camera for a couple of months before I noted any problem. Not that much outdoors use and mainly in dull conditions. I encoutered it first in my home studio with a backlit subject. Now that you know that it shows itself in back lit conditions, you would have found it by now if your camera was faulty. I'm going to call it a fault despite Nikon's denial.