- Messages
- 43,206
- Name
- Alan
- Edit My Images
- No
How come you dont ignore me, i give you a much harder time, NOT happy.![]()
He's ignored me but I'll continue to read his posts as although he may often go off on one like Ken Rockwell he's occasionally funny.
How come you dont ignore me, i give you a much harder time, NOT happy.![]()
Just had someone point out to me that the ISO 6400 images from the set I posted earlier, were the wrong way around... I'd named them wrong... so everyone being so adamant the D700 images were cleaner... well.. you were absolutely correct. The problem is, you were looking at the D7100 files.. so BAZINGA!
Haha, brilliant. Sounds deliberate to me...![]()
Well done that man.
There is still some humour on these forumsHaha, brilliant. Sounds deliberate to me...![]()
![]()
Well done that man.
How come you dont ignore me, i give you a much harder time, NOT happy.![]()
But what about the Numpty who was seeing the D7100 file as betterJust had someone point out to me that the ISO 6400 images from the set I posted earlier, were the wrong way around... I'd named them wrong... so everyone being so adamant the D700 images were cleaner... well.. you were absolutely correct. The problem is, you were looking at the D7100 files.. so BAZINGA!
But what about the Numpty who was seeing the D7100 file as better![]()
Just had someone point out to me that the ISO 6400 images from the set I posted earlier, were the wrong way around... I'd named them wrong... so everyone being so adamant the D700 images were cleaner... well.. you were absolutely correct. The problem is, you were looking at the D7100 files.. so BAZINGA!
And your D700 ones were betterThis is why I posted my own copies up![]()