Nikon adds VR to three supertelephotos, announces two new zooms

Admin

Admin
Messages
2,881
Edit My Images
No
Rounding out Nikon's announcements today are a total of five new lenses. Two are zooms: the AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED and AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED. Plus there are three updated supertelephotos, all of which gain Nikon's image stabilizing VR II: AF-S Nikkor 400mm f/2.8G ED VR, AF-S Nikkor 500mm f/4G ED VR and AF-S Nikkor 600mm f/4G ED VR.

From RobGalbraith : More...
 
ITS LIKE CHRISTMAS!!!! :D :D :D

Only if you've got that lot in your stockings m8 ... :suspect:



Oh dear though ... :eek: ... super dilemmas or what ... :shrug:




08.gif

 
Finally, Nikon have bridged the gap between 24 and 28 with a lens that also goes up to 70. Now a good path might be (for non full frame) 12-24 / 14-24 + 24-70 + 70-200. Horray!
 
You must fancy the macro flash kit.... :thinking: I know it's not n e w but it is just dreamy!

You mean the R1C1 kit? Well... I have considered it, but ive got another idea. Get a SB800 and use that as the commander unit for a R1 kit. That should be enough light to cook any insects I point my camera at. :thumbs::D
 
You mean the R1C1 kit? Well... I have considered it, but ive got another idea. Get a SB800 and use that as the commander unit for a R1 kit. That should be enough light to cook any insects I point my camera at. :thumbs::D

Forgot you had one of those..... I still use my SB21 kit and the histogram..... works for me!

Just realised.... my Nikon compendium has become a history book :(
 
Finally, Nikon have bridged the gap between 24 and 28 with a lens that also goes up to 70. Now a good path might be (for non full frame) 12-24 / 14-24 + 24-70 + 70-200. Horray!

I just want a prime lens, every 10mm from 10mm up to 800mm (On full frame of course). Anything under 50mm should be f1.2 or f1.4, anything above I will let off with being f2.8.:D
 
Forgot you had one of those..... I still use my SB21 kit and the histogram..... works for me!

Just realised.... my Nikon compendium has become a history book :(

I havent got one.. yet. I still haven't got a decent flash gun. I only have the built in one on my D40X (Which I never use). I think its been fired a total of 3 times in all the time ive had it. Keep meaning to build some sort of snoot and diffuser for it.
 
Mmmmm, 24-70 f/2.8 and a D3 would make my day.

Wonder if they are going to release a 300 f/4 G VR? That would be tastyliscious.
 
Oh I agree, Whole heartedly... Just a shame if that sort of thing matters to the individual :)

More to the point, I still plan on getting one of those now!.... And a D300... And a MB-D10..... and a 12-24mm...... an... oh sod it, I can't afford it! :'(
 
Oh I agree, Whole heartedly... Just a shame if that sort of thing matters to the individual :)

More to the point, I still plan on getting one of those now!.... And a D300... And a MB-D10..... and a 12-24mm...... an... oh sod it, I can't afford it! :'(

Hopefully the christmas bonus will be sufficient enough to pay the D300 and then hopefully the few weddings coming up produce the profits to put aside for the 24-70. One word then, sorted, atleast until I get me mits on a D3.
 
Came across this on another forum. Bjørn Rørslett reviews the new 24-70/2.8.

http://www.naturfotograf.com/lens_zoom_02.html#AFS24-70FX

He's normally a hard chap to please, e.g. he doesn't like the 28/1.4 or 105 VR that others rave over, but he seems to like this one.
Bjørn Rørslett said:
The 28-70/2.8 has long been recognised as among the best ever made by Nikon. I'm happy to report that the new 24-70 takes this quality even further. It has a very modest amount of field curvature at 24mm and virtually none at 70 mm, so you can apporach your subject without fear of the corners going unsharp. Light fall-off can probably be measured in a research lab but is undetectable within the frame of a DX camera, more or less the same behaviour is seen on the D3 but this statement is only tentative until I get my D3 later.

Very sharp images result on-axis at 24 mm even at f/2.8 and the contrast was good all over the frame with corners ever so slightly softer. At f/4 the entire frame at 24 mm appears sharp and crisply defined with excellent contrast and colour saturation. Stopping down further changed little of these traits until you got near f/16, where lowering of contrast and the onset of loss of detail commenced to be more visible. Still, I would not hesitate shooting at f/16 even on the wide end of the range.

For the long end, f/2.8 delivered sharp images across the entire frame and this improved further at f/4. Absolutely state of the art optical performance and the enhanced acuity and better micro-contrast compared to the identical capture with the 28-70 were plainly visible. Image quality held up well to beyond f/16, even f/22 looked very acceptable, a most unusual finding. <snip>

I'll run tests on this lens on a D3 later to confirm these findings, but as of now, the new 24-70/2.8 Nikkor is the reference for all other midrange zoom lenses.

So, the perfect partner for a D3 then, and an elegant way to round the price out to a neat £5000 for those who have that sort of money.
 
Back
Top