Nikon 300mm f2.8 G ED VR II AF-S bag/case

May be worth getting something big enough to hold the lens with camera attached. I bought a Lowepro rucksack that holds my 500mm but did not consider leaving the camera attached. Luckily it does fit (it is a tight squeeze though)
I keep the lens / camera in the rucksack all the time. Just pickup the bag when I am heading out.

I bought the AW500 but they do smaller (so cheaper) versions.

Dave.
 
Dave Semmens said:
May be worth getting something big enough to hold the lens with camera attached. I bought a Lowepro rucksack that holds my 500mm but did not consider leaving the camera attached. Luckily it does fit (it is a tight squeeze though)
I keep the lens / camera in the rucksack all the time. Just pickup the bag when I am heading out.

I bought the AW500 but they do smaller (so cheaper) versions.

Dave.
Click to expand...
I must admit the other day I tried my D700 with grip and my 300 f2.8vr and it did fit in the Nikon CL-L1 bag, the only thing is there is not enough further adjustment to have a TC fitted also. I have used this setup since, and the padding of the Nikon bag is superb. Failing that I use a Lowepro Vertex 200aw, but this may be a bit big for your requirements.
 
Darren h said:
Cheers for the replies guys. I was hopefully looking for a case just for the lens with no body attached but looking at the Lowepro bags on WEX there doesn't seem to be one large enough.
Daz
Click to expand...
Check Amazon - Lowepro do bags for lenses up to at least 600mm - so I am sure your 300 will be catered for :)

Nikon cases are much more usable than the hard case supplied by Canon (I have used both) the fact that you can leave the camera attached is great.

Dave.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top