- Messages
- 43,206
- Name
- Alan
- Edit My Images
- No
Was going to say the same. The producers have hinted that the next Bond will be a different race or gender to keep the role contemporary (I didn’t say I agree, so don’t shoot the messenger). He fits the bill perfectly and has the right mix of appeal for both men and women IMO.
I think Daniel Craig has done a good job with Bond, he’s been the best since Sean Connery for me. The worst was Roger Moore.
Urgh. I think this is likely but I'm against it. Unfortunately for the woke warriors James Bond is the name and in every film so far he's been a white Brit and IMO should remain so. I have no issue what so ever with another character being created and I'd very probably watch it but please lets not get into this gender, race and sexuality silliness with an existing and established character. This isn't Dr Who or Sam Beckett (I liked Quantum Leap.)
I'm all for ignoring race and gender and for sure we can have an action hero who is whatever race, gender or sexuality we can imagine. I really don't care, but lets have some consistency and if 007 simply has to be a woman or a different ethnicity or sexuality because we just can't have another straight white man in these woke days I hope they do the sensible thing and make the character 008.
For anyone who's seen Coronation Street... there's a character who is now as far as I can see white who used to not be. He's the child of a mixed race marriage and he, his parents and his brother have all been in the soap. He disappeared for a while and when he came back he'd changed race. Barmy. IMO.
I didn't like any of the pre DC Bonds. To me they were hammy and almost parody. I like the DC films the most but I think that after Casino Royal each one has been progressively worse. Skyfall to me was 007 meets Home Alone. I watched it but I also thought they could have done much better.
Last edited: