lodious
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 181
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I'm aiming to get some old negatives / slides scanned to present in a blurb book (i.e. they aren't going to printed big). I have c.500 negatives to look through, probably end up using about 50-70 images. All images are 35mm format, but a mix of slide and negative. I'm not after the ultimate in quality, but I tried scanning with an 10year old Epson flatbed years ago (think it was a Perfection2450), and came away thinking that without some kind of dust removal, it was taking too long to retouch each image to be workable. The colour balance was a bit unpredictable too.
My current thinking is to buy some kind on standalone viewer or light table /loupe to quickly work out which images are worth scanning, then use something like an Epson V500 to scan multiple images simultaneously. I've looked at the Plustek 7600i, but the scans appear to take a long time for a single image, and without an auto feeder, I can see the scanning process taking too long to be practical. Perhaps if the Plustek would be more consistent in scanning or require less post processing, it would work out quicker?
Is this a sensible approach? Can someone explain / recommend what hardware i'd need to quickly preview the images (should I buy a light table and loupe or something all in one?) Is it quicker to use a stand alone hardware viewer or should I use the scanner to preview the images (this obviously won't work for a the Plustek, as it would take too long).
I'd rather compromise on quality and get to the end of the task, than have great quality and only do 5 scans.
Any help would be much appreciated.
My current thinking is to buy some kind on standalone viewer or light table /loupe to quickly work out which images are worth scanning, then use something like an Epson V500 to scan multiple images simultaneously. I've looked at the Plustek 7600i, but the scans appear to take a long time for a single image, and without an auto feeder, I can see the scanning process taking too long to be practical. Perhaps if the Plustek would be more consistent in scanning or require less post processing, it would work out quicker?
Is this a sensible approach? Can someone explain / recommend what hardware i'd need to quickly preview the images (should I buy a light table and loupe or something all in one?) Is it quicker to use a stand alone hardware viewer or should I use the scanner to preview the images (this obviously won't work for a the Plustek, as it would take too long).
I'd rather compromise on quality and get to the end of the task, than have great quality and only do 5 scans.
Any help would be much appreciated.