Grendel
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 9,005
- Name
- Paul
- Edit My Images
- No
It's ocurred to me that I really enjoy macro photography, although I've been doing with with my Sigma 17-70mm or my nifty fifty. The time has come for me to invest in a true macro lens. I've narrowed my choice down to either the Canon EF-S 60mm f2.8 USM macro or the Canon EF 100mm f2.8 USM macro. The 100mm comes in at around the £360 mark, the 60mm is around the £260. Price isn't a problem, either are within budget. I know I could buy the Sigma version of either for less but I've done the research and feel the Canon have the upper hand in terms of build quality. My indecision is on which focal length to go for :shrug: I can see advantages / disadvantages with both :bonk: Can anyone offer any advice that might help me come to a decision? Thanks in advance 

with the others ... no question you should opt for the longer lens Grendel ... you won't regret it ...