RichardC27
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 3,839
- Name
- Richard
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I've been sat here pondering whether it is worth me investing in a monopod again. I tried one last year and found that I didn't get on with it at all. However, due to the lens I was using not having a tridpod collar, I had to fit it directly to the bottom of the body, where I found it restricted my movement too much (it was a cheapo Jessops job anyway).
Now though, my Sigma 120-400mm lens has a tripod collar, so the monopod would be mounted away from the body, hence freeing up my movement (I think?). Also, my lens has IS, and sometimes this can cause problems when using a tripod. Does anybody know if this will cause problems when using a monopod?
Can anybody recommend a decent quality but relatively inexpensive monopod for me to try? I don't want to shell out loads as I may end up selling it soon after buying.
Edit: My Sigma 120-400mm lens weighs 1.75kg, so any monopod/head combo will have to be strong enough to take that weight.
Now though, my Sigma 120-400mm lens has a tripod collar, so the monopod would be mounted away from the body, hence freeing up my movement (I think?). Also, my lens has IS, and sometimes this can cause problems when using a tripod. Does anybody know if this will cause problems when using a monopod?
Can anybody recommend a decent quality but relatively inexpensive monopod for me to try? I don't want to shell out loads as I may end up selling it soon after buying.
Edit: My Sigma 120-400mm lens weighs 1.75kg, so any monopod/head combo will have to be strong enough to take that weight.
.