Erudite![]()

Doesn't count, has be orange or yellowMine is black. 640. It is superb!!![]()
Doesn't count, has be orange or yellow![]()
Well as there was only 3 minutes between the posts (blimey! maths tooThanks pal. Must have taken you ages to find the right word!![]()
Well as there was only 3 minutes between the posts (blimey! maths too), I think intelligent people would (and did) guess that it's a word I'm familiar with
![]()
Well, is it ok to start a dedicated Mobile Phone Camera thread? You know, where people can post pics from phones?
There is one.
https://www.talkphotography.co.uk/threads/iphone-images-post-your-iphone-mobile-pics-here.170974/
Its been going for the last 6 years!
Mobile cameras are probably OK for shots of mates down the pub but that's about all IMHO
Mobile cameras are probably OK for shots of mates down the pub but that's about all IMHO
Exactly the one I referred to earlier. Printed out larger than most here who say it is rubbish ever do themselves.Have you seen the iPhone 6 campaign?! (billboards!)
I must admit I was surrprised at some of the photos featured (see http://www.cultofmac.com/327169/pho...h-exposure-from-shot-on-iphone-6-ad-campaign/) and some look suspiciously better on the bbillboard than even when viewed on a much smaller screen which makes me think they might have been tweaked for the larger format, and this I thought was interesting;Exactly the one I referred to earlier. Printed out larger than most here who say it is rubbish ever do themselves.
Not sure what is interesting about that? Doesn't that distinguish the pro's from the amateurs, knowing not just their value but also the market value...And not least approaching it from a business perspective opposed to 'just pleased they want to use my picture'I must admit I was surrprised at some of the photos featured (see http://www.cultofmac.com/327169/pho...h-exposure-from-shot-on-iphone-6-ad-campaign/) and some look suspiciously better on the bbillboard than even when viewed on a much smaller screen, and this I thought was interesting;
"Photographers were paid for the images selected, but none could discuss how much because of a non-disclosure agreement they all had to sign. Some privately said they did not question what was offered and later found out some of the professional photographers were able to negotiate a higher fee."
![]()
I guess so. But one thing I think it shows is they seem very keen to use the professional's shots in the campagn, as why would such a huge powerful company have their arms twisted over raising what must have been a standard fee that other's weren't asking? My cynical side thinks its because it showed their product in a much better light?Not sure what is interesting about that? Doesn't that distinguish the pro's from the amateurs, knowing not just their value but also the market value...And not least approaching it from a business perspective opposed to 'just pleased they want to use my picture'![]()
Perhaps because there is more than just the tools to take a fantastic photo? Who knows, does it really matter that some people may get paid more than others?I guess so. But one thing I think it shows is they seem very keen to use the professional's shots in the campagn, as why would such a huge powerful company have their arms twisted over raising what must have been a standard fee that other's weren't asking? Maybe because it showed their product in a much better light?
No, it doesn't matter.Perhaps because there is more than just the tools to take a fantastic photo? Who knows, does it really matter that some people may get paid more than others?
I would prefer curious to boringNo, it doesn't matter.
I just thought it was interesting.
Guess I'm boring as f***
It does sound as if you never really needed a DSLR?Well, i sold my DSLR setup as after 2 holidays of using my Mobile phone camera and seeing the results i found that for 'ME' the photos were more than good enough for what i use a camera for. I even made to Photo albums |(Sent pics off to have done) and everyone was well impressed with the result. I am not a pro in any shape or form so for me it serves my needs and has given me some really superb results. Plus, its so nice not to carry bulky DSLR equipment around!!
I can only see Mob Phone camera tech getting better and better. Compared to a couple of years ago its improved vastly!
It does sound as if you never really needed a DSLR?
Really? Does it slot as easy in a pocket of your trousers as a phone?I have my RX100 for when I don't want to lug my DSLR about, aps-c IQ, full control and smaller than my iPhone!
RX100 v iphone by Jim, on FlickrBut do you want those interruptions when you're chilling, and trying to enjoy your photography?For me, the phone wins as i can text and phone with it!! lol
Ok, it is thicker, but its not really noticable in your pocket! That begs the question, why use a phone when you can carry one of these.