- Messages
- 11,730
- Name
- Chris
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Still wondering about the OC/OL/OF/OY idea, and as part of that, wondering about a rangefinder. I've been scouring the web for information about Leica-like cameras, as the real things are just too expensive to justify. My thoughts so far:
- Bessa R3A sounds nice but very expensive, AFAICS. Like the idea of a 1:1 finder, but the frameline set might be an issue
- Bessa R2A also nice, also expensive, better selection of framelines?
- Minolta CLE is pumped up hard by that Ken Rockwell, looks really nice, but again the 28-40-90 framelines. Also no metering in manual mode.
- Konica Hexar RF also looks nice, stacks of frameline options, motor wind and rewind... would that be limiting if I'm going to process my film with the Rondinax and want the end left out?
40mm sounds a decent focal length, although I wasn't that excited by it with my QL-17. But the available M-mount 40mm lenses are all tiny (good) but with apparently very narrow focus rings with added tab, which again I didn't like with the QL-17. I need to carry a fair bit of the camera weight with my left hand; using the SLR I can do that while turning the (easy-to-feel) focus ring, but on the QL-17 I had to get my hand off the lens, supporting the camera with my dodgy right hand, then find and move the focus tab... The 50 and 35mm lenses seem to have a bit more of a ring...
I dunno, I'm all over the place, might come to nothing, but any thoughts?
- Bessa R3A sounds nice but very expensive, AFAICS. Like the idea of a 1:1 finder, but the frameline set might be an issue
- Bessa R2A also nice, also expensive, better selection of framelines?
- Minolta CLE is pumped up hard by that Ken Rockwell, looks really nice, but again the 28-40-90 framelines. Also no metering in manual mode.
- Konica Hexar RF also looks nice, stacks of frameline options, motor wind and rewind... would that be limiting if I'm going to process my film with the Rondinax and want the end left out?
40mm sounds a decent focal length, although I wasn't that excited by it with my QL-17. But the available M-mount 40mm lenses are all tiny (good) but with apparently very narrow focus rings with added tab, which again I didn't like with the QL-17. I need to carry a fair bit of the camera weight with my left hand; using the SLR I can do that while turning the (easy-to-feel) focus ring, but on the QL-17 I had to get my hand off the lens, supporting the camera with my dodgy right hand, then find and move the focus tab... The 50 and 35mm lenses seem to have a bit more of a ring...
I dunno, I'm all over the place, might come to nothing, but any thoughts?