MF Question

Barney

Suspended / Banned
Messages
3,043
Name
Wayne
Edit My Images
No
I want a MF camera with tilt and swing any suggestions,

I am finding static lens very restricting.

On Digital I just bought a PC lens, are there similar lenses for Bronica and Mamiya or do i have to change the lot, what are the pro's and cons?
 
Last edited:
The Rollei SL66 has a small amount of tilt, but don't think it has swing.
 
Last edited:
There is a Rollei MF camera that has tilts and swings although I can't recall the model. I think it might be the one that makes a Mamiya RZ67 look like a pocket camera.

The Mamiya RZ67 has a tilt/shift adapter that allows you to both tilt and shift (it's in the name, really :) ) but because it effectively acts as an extension tube, you need to use it with special short barrel lenses (SB designation) of which I think there were two. I don't know if it was ever available for the RB67.

Beyond that, you could take a look at this


which may be what you need (just add the camera...). I'm sure @stevelmx5 can talk to you about it.
 
Just a thought: tilt is a swivel around a horizontal axis, and swing a tilt around a vertical axis, so you can convert one to the other by turning the camera through 90 degrees.

Or just use a 5x4 with a medium format back. There is one for one camera which let's you slide the ground glass and film holder to make swapping quicker.
 
Last edited:
There is a Rollei MF camera that has tilts and swings although I can't recall the model. I think it might be the one that makes a Mamiya RZ67 look like a pocket camera.

The Mamiya RZ67 has a tilt/shift adapter that allows you to both tilt and shift (it's in the name, really :) ) but because it effectively acts as an extension tube, you need to use it with special short barrel lenses (SB designation) of which I think there were two. I don't know if it was ever available for the RB67.

Beyond that, you could take a look at this


which may be what you need (just add the camera...). I'm sure @stevelmx5 can talk to you about it.
I suspect you are thinking of the Fuji GX680 rather than the Rollie SL66.


This was my dream camera at one time, but I've never even touched one.
 
Your suspicions are correct. A local dealers had one in a few months ago; for all I know, they still have. I'll stick to lighter large format cameras :)
 
Last edited:
Your suspicions are correct. A local dealers had one in a few months ago; for all I know, they still have. I'll stick to lighter large format cameras :)
If I had a darkroom I would be all in. Son is thinking of moving out to live with his girlfriend, so hope shines eternal,
 
The GX680 is probably the answer though a heavy one!

It is a fantastic camera (I have one, and yes I do lug it around the countryside, but you really need to man-up to do it, with a couple of backs, and a couple of lenses plus a tripod, its a good workout)

Its also surprisingly cheap (compared with what it cost new)

Last year I paid £855 for a GX680 (with proper Fuji converted AA battery pack), 3 backs (two needed batterries replacing, but that was £15 and 40mins of my time), 4 lenses (65/100/135/210), remote release, short and medium bellows and both WLF and and angle finder viewing systems. Oh and it had some warranty as well :)

That works out to about £65 a kilo :ROFLMAO:

There is not a huge amount of movement, especially on the short bellows, but enough (IMO). I have really only experimented with Shift, but I have plans..............

The lenses are excellent, very sharp (as you would expect given what it cost in 1993)


IMG_4829 by David Yeoman, on Flickr

Some pictures here

 
Last edited:
The GX680 is probably the answer though a heavy one!

It is a fantastic camera (I have one, and yes I do lug it around the countryside, but you really need to man-up to do it, with a couple of backs, and a couple of lenses plus a tripod, its a good workout)

Its also surprisingly cheap (compared with what it cost new)

Last year I paid £855 for a GX680 (with proper Fuji converted AA battery pack), 3 backs (two needed batterries replacing, but that was £15 and 40mins of my time), 4 lenses (65/100/135/210), remote release, short and medium bellows and both WLF and and angle finder viewing systems. Oh and it had some warranty as well :)

Please don't share things like this.

You will set me off looking for one :)

I have much more important things to spend my photographic budget on, but I still so want one ;-(

That works out to about £65 a kilo :ROFLMAO:

There is not a huge amount of movement, especially on the short bellows, but enough (IMO). I have really only experimented with Shift, but I have plans..............

The lenses are excellent, very sharp (as you would expect given what it cost in 1993)


IMG_4829 by David Yeoman, on Flickr

Some pictures here

 
Please don't share things like this.

You will set me off looking for one :)

I have much more important things to spend my photographic budget on, but I still so want one ;-(

My purchase was definitely a "want" not a "need", like many things it was an itch that had to be scratched.

It definitely requires pre-trip planning,
 
I used to own the tilt/shift adaptor for Mamiya RZ67 and wrote a blog post about it:


My conclusion was:
"In summary, I have found that the 75mm SB lens, combined with the adapter, is pretty useful for many landscapes and moderately-challenging architectural features, as well as for close-ups. The adapter also works well with the 110mm lens for close-up work. But the limited lens choice with the adapter, and the relatively limited amount of movement, means that this setup will not suit everyone as an alternative to a full view-camera kit. If you’re already an owner of an RZ67, it may attract you, but if you’re not already an RZ owner I doubt that you would choose this route as a way of getting into camera movements."

Later I moved into large format and can confirm that the Mamiya + adaptor kit was considerably heavier than my large format fiield camera
 
My purchase was definitely a "want" not a "need", like many things it was an itch that had to be scratched.

It definitely requires pre-trip planning,
I certainly have no need for one, and although I have some nostalgia for film, I wouldn't want to go back to it without a darkroom. And it would make more sense, for me to go 5x4 rather than a GX680, so it's all a bit of a fantasy.
 
If you want a FULL range of movements you simply won't get them with any MF camera, you need a monorail camera, complete with a lens that has a very large image circle, which allows extreme use of movements if required, I think it's as simple as that.

Rear standard movements are every bit as important as front standard movements. Yes, you'll have to learn about Scheimpflug, and it's a steep learning curve, but doing so will open up a whole new world.

A workable compromise might be to get a 5"x4" monorail and a rollfilm back - the big advantage, other than film cost saving, will be that the lens won't need to be able to have such a large image circle.
 
There are various Horseman 6x9 models, for example: http://www.bnphoto.org/bnphoto/LFN/CamProf_HorsemanVH.htm.

I have a Horseman 760 which doesn't have a coupled rangefinder and is missing front swing and back movements. I also have a monocular focussing back for it which I find easier than using a dark cloth for 6x9.

Taken using a 90mm Angulon (about a standard focal length for a 6x9 camera) using Ilford XP2.

1758806564378.jpeg
 
If you want a FULL range of movements you simply won't get them with any MF camera, you need a monorail camera, complete with a lens that has a very large image circle, which allows extreme use of movements if required, I think it's as simple as that.

Rear standard movements are every bit as important as front standard movements. Yes, you'll have to learn about Scheimpflug, and it's a steep learning curve, but doing so will open up a whole new world.

A workable compromise might be to get a 5"x4" monorail and a rollfilm back - the big advantage, other than film cost saving, will be that the lens won't need to be able to have such a large image circle.

If you just want front movements, most LF cameras have rise/fall, swing and tilt; my Walker and Canham field cameras (much easier to carry around than most monorails) lack only rear rise/fall.

Should you take the LF route, consider 5x7. The cameras are only marginally bigger than 5x4, and have the width to potentially take a 6x17 back.

I originally bought a large format camera because it was smaller and lighter than my RZ67 with shift lens.
 
@Barney I see you give your location as 'oop north' but maybe there are some LF users nearby who could show you what one is like and what it can do?
 
There are various Horseman 6x9 models, for example: http://www.bnphoto.org/bnphoto/LFN/CamProf_HorsemanVH.htm.

I have a Horseman 760 which doesn't have a coupled rangefinder and is missing front swing and back movements. I also have a monocular focussing back for it which I find easier than using a dark cloth for 6x9.

Taken using a 90mm Angulon (about a standard focal length for a 6x9 camera) using Ilford XP2.

View attachment 463988
There are or were a number of 6X9 cameras with greater or lesser degrees of movement from the likes of Horseman, Linhof , the little Speed Graphic to name a few. All of which are a smaller and lighter package than the GX680 and rely on clockwork not electronics to keep them working, of cause very different in use and would still need a tripod if you are going to do anything more complicated than using them as a rangefinder 'press' camera.
 
Thank you all for you advice and generous offers of instruction and demonstration of the various equipment, I feel quite humbled but equally enthused. I will be taking you all up on it!

Yesterday I knew exactly what I wanted, but, as usual, all your excellent advice has given me more than enough to think about.

I will be in touch!
 
Wayne, have a read through this:


The X-act system is superb or buy a Schneider tilt shift lens and My 6003 in the for sale section (y)

Schneider tilt/shift lens:

 
That looks a lovely system Fraser, Sadly it is not a cost effective solution, for me, when considering the price of the lens.
 
There are a few 'official' ways to get movements in the Hasselblad system - a 1.4 'PC Mutar' teleconverter, and the 'Arcbody' and 'Flexbody' - one of which uses Hasselblad lenses, and the other uses large format (I think?) lenses to get more movement. However, they do all seem like a bit of a workaround with too many downsides. Is it maybe a bit easier to get a roll film back for a large format camera? That way you get all the benefits of roll film while working with all the large format movements.
 
Back
Top