Marts
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 737
- Name
- Martin
- Edit My Images
- Yes

Morning Martin
Beautiful old camera & great processing , the sepia suts it perfectly![]()

nes of doing 
But a great photo and idea Hiya Martin,
Well done on all the recent photos. Your pics for the Wrong week are fab and love the detail you have caught in the fly. As for borrowing money from your child's piggy bank that is a :nono:![]()
But a great photo and idea
Have to love your take on Paradox, never thought of it that way .... but makes senseNow I look forward to what you really do come up with for this week.
Cheers
Dawn![]()
Hi Martin, great take on the wrong theme! Your paradox joke made me smile,

The Pink Elephant Paradox
The pink elephant paradox refers to the threat to inductive thinking caused by the difficulty of inadvertently proving the existence of a concept or phenomena just because it overtly or insidiously exists in ones thoughts, leading to mis-attribution, or mis-categorization of data, and thus subverting inductive processes.
I saw the picture as soon as you posted but it hurt my head reading the words. But nice sharp pictureMartin, what in ttthhhheee hell does that mean....??
Really gave me a headache...
You certainly filled the frame...where is it?
I saw the picture as soon as you posted but it hurt my head reading the words. But nice sharp picture
![]()
your pair a ducks is class and i think should be the best of that theme hands downnot too keen on the fly although really well shot
About pink elephants, they exist. I've personally seen them. I was a child and not indulging in drugs or alcoholthey bathe in a pink dust that leaves them ;looking pink
But a nice crisp image if a little cramped![]()



Martin, hope you don't mind .... this is not an edit .... but rather for Tina's enjoyment![]()
Great, sharp image, nice angle too. Like everyone, I have a headache working out the paradox lol. Very well done.
The pink elephant paradox refers to the threat to inductive thinking caused by the difficulty of inadvertently proving the existence of a concept or phenomena just because it overtly or insidiously exists in ones thoughts, leading to mis-attribution, or mis-categorization of data, and thus subverting inductive processes.
Great shot of a very unusual subject Thanks AndyMuch better. What did you do?
What a lovely bunch
Someone had to, ok, ok I'll just![]()


martin...you used daz on those whites didn't ya... you can tell me..
much better... good recovery..![]()