Hi there, I'm a full time commercial photographer looking to upgrade my now-ancient five year old Canon 5D2. Got a couple of questions about what I need, as am thinking about buying a 5DSr, but am not too technically minded to know whether this is a good idea.
Bit of background:
I shoot 90% portraiture, and my two camera systems are my Canon 5D2, and a Hasselblad H4D-50 for more serious jobs. The bulk of my work is beauty headshots, along with a fair amount of full length fashion/lifestyle as well. Currently, almost all of my work is shot on my 5D2, as the Hasselblad is irritating to use even inside my studio where I have full control. I generally reserve the Hasselblad for when people specifically request it, or for when I'm shooting products.
Main reason for upgrading is I can't stand the autofocus on the 5D2, but other than that, it's an amazing camera, and I can't fault it. I'm considering a 5DSr, because it would marry perfectly, size-wise with my Hasselblad and allow me to shoot 50mp backplates in the field for when I'm shooting composite images where I'm combining landscape and studio model into a single shot.
I DO shoot a fair amount of natural light beauty/fashion, as well, and generally never go above ISO 400, as the noise becomes a problem for me.I'd LIKE to shoot more natural light work, but the ISO issue concerns me - my question is, is there ANY reason, given what you've just read that makes you think I'd be better off with a 5D Mark III instead of a 5DSr?
Many thanks in advance
Bit of background:
I shoot 90% portraiture, and my two camera systems are my Canon 5D2, and a Hasselblad H4D-50 for more serious jobs. The bulk of my work is beauty headshots, along with a fair amount of full length fashion/lifestyle as well. Currently, almost all of my work is shot on my 5D2, as the Hasselblad is irritating to use even inside my studio where I have full control. I generally reserve the Hasselblad for when people specifically request it, or for when I'm shooting products.
Main reason for upgrading is I can't stand the autofocus on the 5D2, but other than that, it's an amazing camera, and I can't fault it. I'm considering a 5DSr, because it would marry perfectly, size-wise with my Hasselblad and allow me to shoot 50mp backplates in the field for when I'm shooting composite images where I'm combining landscape and studio model into a single shot.
I DO shoot a fair amount of natural light beauty/fashion, as well, and generally never go above ISO 400, as the noise becomes a problem for me.I'd LIKE to shoot more natural light work, but the ISO issue concerns me - my question is, is there ANY reason, given what you've just read that makes you think I'd be better off with a 5D Mark III instead of a 5DSr?
Many thanks in advance