gnirtS
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 601
- Name
- Richard
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Im still trying to "learn to love" lightroom on the trial thing and just wondering how people generally use it.
Might help if i briefly describe my current setup...
New photos are imported via Bridge into a "Photo Temp" directory with subfolders containing the shoot date (so Photo Temp/20111129/ etc etc). When processed the finished JPGs are exported to "My Pictures" in an appropriate folder. The finished JPGs along with original RAWs are removed from Photo Temp and backed up to an external drive to free up space on the computer.
Editing is done with Bridge for keywording and ACR/Photoshop for actual processing.
This way i have finalised JPGs on my PC to view/show without leaving the drive cluttered up with 100s of large RAW files.
Is this a sane approach with lightroom or is it even possible? Im playing with catalogs etc and although i like the non-destructive editing approach i cant see how i can preserve my changes if i move the RAWs to an external drive once im done with them. I tried a brief test and just got a "missing photo" error.
Is there a way of keeping a master catalog on the PC and simply updating the links to whatever external HDD they now live on so i can find a preview on the PC then know which drive to plug in to edit/get at the original image?
On the subject of catalogs, are people using 1 computer wide "master" with lightroom or lots of sub-ones. Currently im creating a new one in each of the days photos directories in photo temp but suspect this isn't what you're supposed to do and things like keyword lists, collections etc dont seem to be global and are limited in scope to the catalog they're created in.
I can see the benefit in LR for batch processing (even if im finding the interface clunky and have to go into PS to run noiseware, content aware fill and other stuff a lot anyway) along with publishing, watermarking etc but no real idea how to organise properly.
Sorry for all the questions - im after ideas of how other people actually use LR to organise and process their photos and how they back up/keep them afterwards.
Might help if i briefly describe my current setup...
New photos are imported via Bridge into a "Photo Temp" directory with subfolders containing the shoot date (so Photo Temp/20111129/ etc etc). When processed the finished JPGs are exported to "My Pictures" in an appropriate folder. The finished JPGs along with original RAWs are removed from Photo Temp and backed up to an external drive to free up space on the computer.
Editing is done with Bridge for keywording and ACR/Photoshop for actual processing.
This way i have finalised JPGs on my PC to view/show without leaving the drive cluttered up with 100s of large RAW files.
Is this a sane approach with lightroom or is it even possible? Im playing with catalogs etc and although i like the non-destructive editing approach i cant see how i can preserve my changes if i move the RAWs to an external drive once im done with them. I tried a brief test and just got a "missing photo" error.
Is there a way of keeping a master catalog on the PC and simply updating the links to whatever external HDD they now live on so i can find a preview on the PC then know which drive to plug in to edit/get at the original image?
On the subject of catalogs, are people using 1 computer wide "master" with lightroom or lots of sub-ones. Currently im creating a new one in each of the days photos directories in photo temp but suspect this isn't what you're supposed to do and things like keyword lists, collections etc dont seem to be global and are limited in scope to the catalog they're created in.
I can see the benefit in LR for batch processing (even if im finding the interface clunky and have to go into PS to run noiseware, content aware fill and other stuff a lot anyway) along with publishing, watermarking etc but no real idea how to organise properly.
Sorry for all the questions - im after ideas of how other people actually use LR to organise and process their photos and how they back up/keep them afterwards.