I would leave the 18-55 behind and take the other two. I think you'll want that extra FOV from the 10-18 to take in the scale and activity in streets and interiors; the 16-300 to pick out details or people engaged in activity, and to capture compressed cityscapes and architectural details from upper floors. I'd also default to mounting this lens ready for grab shots. There isn't much to choose between these three for aperture, so I don't see any compelling advantage to the 18-55. The 10-18 and 16-300 both have a 67mm filter thread, the kit 18-55 lenses are all 58mm I think, and I like to keep a polariser with me when possible. I have that Tamron, bought as a versatile all-in-one option for when I don't want to take the full kit, and it's proved to be as handy as I hoped. If I could only take one of your lenses, it would be the 16-300. I'm sure I'd wish for the ultrawide at some point though, whereas I wouldn't miss the kit lens. The only thing missing from your gear choice is a fast aperture option, but you can't have everything and I think focal length range is a higher priority in this situation. I'd just lean on thoughtful technique and high ISO if necessary.