Cheers Scott, i am trying to find out which one most people would go for, I mainly do landscape/seascape and seeing they are about £100 a piece i dont want to get one and then everyone says you should have got .....
Cheers Scott, i am trying to find out which one most people would go for, I mainly do landscape/seascape and seeing they are about £100 a piece i dont want to get one and then everyone says you should have got .....
I see them as 'water filters'. If it were me i would go for the 3 stop without real thought. It is only a stop difference between the two after all so the stronger one would be more ideal. I shoot some seascapes and I wouldn't say I was any good (I try) and I find myself using the 0.9 all the time.
I shot this in Cornwall with a 3 stop (plus a 2 stop soft grad to hold beack the sly) This would give some clue as to the effect (in low light at least)
I use the 3-stop Pro Glass. It is a lovely piece of glass but then it ought to be at the price. A couple of my examples from Cornwall below too. The first one there was stacked with a Lee 2-stop hard edge ND Grad and resulted in 20 seconds at f8 (iso 100).
I have the three stop ND pro-glass and a set of ND grad hard resins (all Lee). I have found in many situations I can pull the nd grads right down to fully cover the lens with the dark part; effectively acting as a full nd filter. This is using a Tokina 12-24 UWA with 77mm filter thread and wide angle filter holder. Not noticed any difference in quality. If there is any light leakage at the bottom, you can often position the frame to allow you to crop a tad off.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.