The meter in the D700 is many times better.
I never use center weighted (on the right), and I certainly never use spot (on the left). With the Matrix meter, just shoot. It's smart enough to do all the compensation and locking that you used to have to do in the older modes.
I just read this on his D700 post and it really annoyed me. He's basically saying that spot and CW metering are useless...
What a load of BS
</rant>
Is he? Really? Reads to me that he's saying he doesn't bother with spot or CW metering, and prefers to use matrix as it is good enough for what he needs.
All about perception and interpretation I guess. Not sure that's basis enough to class someone as a moron though.
Not necessarily xil, that may be exactly what he meant, I don't know.I guess I just took it the wrong way....
I enjoy reading Ken, I think he talks a lot sense although he does seem to like winding people up sometimes.
With regard to matrix metering, Nikon were claiming years ago that if you found a scene which matrix metering couldn't cope with, it was outside of the ability of film to deal with it anyway. That's probably a bit of a stretch, but I certainly pushed it to the limits in some very demanding situations and I don't recall it ever lettiing me down, in fact many times it just impressed the arse off me.
I believe it, but I wouldn't totally forget about spot and CW...
I never use center weighted metering, which is a throwback to the 1970s.

A few things that he writes are useful. His lens reviews are good overviews.
He does come up with some right odd stuff though:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/digital-killed-my-tripod.htm
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nm/aliens/index.htm
A lot of what he writes is downright misleading for people new to photography.
He has the kind of face I wouldn't tire of punching.
He has the kind of face I wouldn't tire of punching.






I must admit I'm amazed at the amount of venom KR stirs up. You don't have to visit his web site, you know. Nobody's forcing you. If you do visit it, you don't have to take it seriously. And if you want to have a good rant about something, there are zillions of far worse things out there.
I must admit I'm amazed at the amount of venom KR stirs up. You don't have to visit his web site, you know. Nobody's forcing you. If you do visit it, you don't have to take it seriously. And if you want to have a good rant about something, there are zillions of far worse things out there.
My opinion? Neither a godsend nor a moron. He can be entertaining. He can be stupid. He can be right. He can be wrong. But that applies to pretty much everybody I know. (Except some who are never entertaining.)
I think KR's best characteristic is that he tends to get straight to the point. You know exactly what his opinion is. You don't have to agree with him, and working out why you don't agree with him can sometimes be enlightening.
And I think his other best characteristic is that he doesn't seem to take himself half as seriously as some people round here do. Punch his face in? Come on, that's not acceptable on the street and it's not acceptable here. Lighten up.

And I think his other best characteristic is that he doesn't seem to take himself half as seriously as some people round here do. Punch his face in? Come on, that's not acceptable on the street and it's not acceptable here. Lighten up.
He does come up with some right odd stuff though:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/digital-killed-my-tripod.htm
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nm/aliens/index.htm
In actual fact, his manuals are AMAZING!
Just been reading through the D200 one, and it is SOOOOOOO helping me learn my new toy.
The Nikon manual is CRAP :razz:
A few things that he writes are useful. His lens reviews are good overviews.
He does come up with some right odd stuff though:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/digital-killed-my-tripod.htm
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nm/aliens/index.htm
A lot of what he writes is downright misleading for people new to photography.
Yeah, me too, I used his settings as a basis, then learnt to re-set them up to suit me. The manuals are, well....factual. I mean they presuppose a certain level of expertise and knowledge. They'll tell you what the settings are for, but not how to use them.
While often inspired by actual products and events, just like any other good news organization, I like to make things up and stretch the truth if they make an article more fun. In the case of new products, rumors and just plain silly stuff, it's all pretend. If you lack a good BS detector, please treat this entire site as a work of fiction.
IIRC, he disliked the D3x quite a lot and really panned it (when comparing it to the "standard" D3) so I was a little surprised to see that he's ordered one... Sounds like even HE doesn't trust his own reviews - or maybe he decided he'd better actually use one before spouting about it?
I have the playful, immature and creative, trouble-making mind of a seven-year-old, so read accordingly.
This site is purely my personal speech and opinion, and a way for me to goof around.
While often inspired by actual products and events, just like any other good news organization, I like to make things up and stretch the truth if they make an article more fun. In the case of new products, rumors and just plain silly stuff, it's all pretend. If you lack a good BS detector, please treat this entire site as a work of fiction.