Kate's "boobs"

but are more likely to get stuck to the bedroom ceiling :coat: :lol:

to be fair I'd say the real blame rests withthe consumer who buys that kind of crap - the magazines only print it because it sells , if joe public didnt buy it there'd be no market for these sort of shots and paps would have o find something else to do

it is Impossible to control the prurience of millions of readers, nor is it illegal for them to ogle semi naked pictures.
It is illegal to to use a long lens to break someones privacy and to publish the results.

The public will always buy smut.
Many millions have been made from that fact.
 
on the other thread mark (demlion) said top end canon with a 800mm (presumably the sigmonster as canon don't make an 800mm) and a 2xtc - and then some fairly hefty cropping.

Ive no idea whether that was what was used or just speculation - but an outfit like that is what customs and excise use to get incriminating shots of drug deals at a similar range

I haven't a clue either, but there is a Canon 800mm f5.6: http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=363&sort=7&cat=2&page=4.
 
I wonder what the laws on privacy are like in France? Bearing in mind UK law won't cover them. So to speak..
 
...As for the comments on the Kate, i've seen far less offensive comments about 'models' pulled up in the past.

Let's just say I'm not happy to call myself a photographer right now!

:agree:

To those of you who are making fun of Kate, may I remind you that you probably wouldn't like it if complete strangers on an internet forum made fun of your physical attributes! :thumbsdown:

Leave the woman alone!
 
on the other hand most of us don't have incredibly priviledged lives paid for at the tax payers expense - if you can't stand the heat , don't marry a royal
 
Terrywoodenpic said:
so which is worse Raping or reading about it?


That's a bit of a jump, comparing rape to taking a picture , which is worse, rape or searching out the pictures on the Internet would be more like it

Anybody who buys the magazine or searches out the pictures fuels the fire IMO
 
That's a bit of a jump, comparing rape to taking a picture , which is worse, rape or searching out the pictures on the Internet would be more like it

Anybody who buys the magazine or searches out the pictures fuels the fire IMO

I did not compare, I offered a principal.
 
I did not compare, I offered a principal.

You offered a what? Please explain, even if it is just me, that doesn't have a clue as to how your mind works.../what you are talking about because I for one, am struggling to link the analogy of "boobs out pics sniped from 1/2 mile" to rape, as opposed to well i don't know what.

Please, enlighten me... :thumbs:
 
I was saying to the missus the other night that Kate should to a full-on topless shoot......

OK, it's never going to happen but once it's done the fascination would probably wear off and she can get 'em out in future and no one would bat and eyelid :lol:
 
on the other hand most of us don't have incredibly priviledged lives paid for at the tax payers expense - if you can't stand the heat , don't marry a royal

Almost none of that is accurate. The crown gave the income from the crown estates in perpetuity to the exchequer in return for what used to be called the civil list. The income received by the exchequer from the crown estates massively outweighs what goes back to fund the head of state and royal household expenses.

I also don't buy into the "marry someone famous and you become public property" argument.
 
I'm pretty surprised that everyone is going on about the size of her boobs.
surely this is absolutely not linked to the topic...some women are slim, some are more curvaceous. The invasion of her privacy is no linked to either.
she was hidden away from the public eye and the amount of effort he had to go to to get this shot....it's not journalism, it's just perving
it's not in the interest of the public and only vaguely (to me) of public interest
anyway I think she looks hot

shooting at that range...I'm sure a tripod entered into the equation at some point
 
Tits are tits, what's all the fuss about ?

She looks very nice with her clothes on, ok maybe people have been left a little disappointed now that her royal assets have been deployed, it only shows she is human after all !

I see it as my duty to look at them and it would be the same had they have been of our current queen :)
 
Russ77 said:
I was saying to the missus the other night that Kate should to a full-on topless shoot......

OK, it's never going to happen but once it's done the fascination would probably wear off and she can get 'em out in future and no one would bat and eyelid :lol:

Id love to hear you explaining that to her. Ha ha, that made me chuckle !!
 
Id love to hear you explaining that to her. Ha ha, that made me chuckle !!

I could make an plea on behalf of TP? :lol:

I'm quite used to getting the P taken out of me at every opportunity so normally get the jokes in before anyone else can so they have no ammo, thought this would work in the same way although it's fundementally flawed as a future queen won't be getting her thrupenees out voluntarily :lol:
 
You offered a what? Please explain, even if it is just me, that doesn't have a clue as to how your mind works.../what you are talking about because I for one, am struggling to link the analogy of "boobs out pics sniped from 1/2 mile" to rape, as opposed to well i don't know what.

Please, enlighten me... :thumbs:

From what you say, that would be too big a task for me, and the prospect of a reasonable result minimal.

I do not think surface thinking can work at the necessary level.
 
From what you say, that would be too big a task for me, and the prospect of a reasonable result minimal.

I do not think surface thinking can work at the necessary level.



Oh I get it. You meant principle as in morals...... :thumbs:
I was thinking, what is he on about with principals?


All is clear now.
 
in spite of my moral objection to everyone going on about kates boobs, there is a very funny mock up for the next royal mint, a very regal profile i might say. and with added inflation I might add....worth a google for comedy purposes
 
Back
Top