You left the wrong lens behind in the first place.Comments...
I'd sell the zoom and work with the prime.
You left the wrong lens behind in the first place.Comments...
You left the wrong lens behind in the first place.
I'd sell the zoom and work with the prime.
You are the one that seems to be suggesting a 'professional' cannot manage to take pictures without a bag of £1000 lenses. Not me.In the circumstances I listed, no, it's not possible, and a professional would not limit their abilities or options that much.
That is exactly what I have done, but I hope you could see the point behind my hypothetical situation.
At some point you will be up against a limitation of some sort and there is no 'perfect' tool for every job.That is exactly what I have done, but I hope you could see the point behind my hypothetical situation.
No, I was the one that suggested a professional required that bag of lenses in order to be able to produce better results more consistently and under more different shooting circumstances (that are often beyond our control).You are the one that seems to be suggesting a 'professional' cannot manage to take pictures without a bag of £1000 lenses. Not me.
None at all, that'll keep paying clients happySo work round it. Take a different picture - or none at all.
No. You suggested there was 'a reason the Nikon 55-200mm f/4.5-5.6 costs £181.99 and the 70-200mm f/2.8 VR costs £1627.99' - I suggested that, when used within their limitations, the difference was not worth paying for.No, I was the one that suggested a professional required that bag of lenses in order to be able to produce better results more consistently and under more different shooting circumstances (that are often beyond our control).
Urbex and paying customers?None at all, that'll keep paying clients happy![]()
Jolly good.But, I will now listen to my own advice. I'm done discussing this, or anything else, with you.
Urbex and paying customers?
No mix up on my part. He was just making a snide comment in replying to a suggestion I made to you in your 'hypothetical situation'.I was the one who mentioned Urbex - not him. I presume he does photography for work, whereas I don't. Bit of a mixup there.
I don't know what it is about equipment but I've noticed on logging on that the number of people inhabiting the many and varied forums (fora?) fores on TP has changed in the last year.
In days of old I'd log on and the proportion of people in the "talk photography" forum would roughly equal the number in the "equipment" forum with the rest of happy campers spread around the various "Oh look, an actual picture" forums.
This morning at 7am there were 14 hardy souls in TP and 20 in equipment with all the others attracting 3 or 4.
So, is photography about the end product for you? is it about taking an image and seeing what you can produce in PP? or is it about collecting the best gear you can? and is that then enough or do you try to get the best out of your shinies?
eye for composition first...
gear later
Exactly - you can practice with charcoal and guache til the camera arrives...![]()
Rive gauche...?
A left-handed compliment perhaps...lol
