interesting article on the Lomo

Really interesting article, read it this morning. An article, related to film photography, on the Top 10 on BBC News website (it isn't now, but it was when I read it this morning), is fantastic news regardless of whether you love or loathe Lomography.

Slightly disappointed with the assumption that an LC-A exclusively has some features, for instance:

Long shutter speed - the Lomo LC-A's shutter stays open for as long as it needs to expose a photo, which can lead to interesting light trails

This is hardly a distinguishing feature.

All in all though, Lomography are doing more to support film photography than a lot of players in the market at the moment - sure, it's at hefty prices, but they are developing film cameras and, more importantly, they are selling products at those high prices - so clearly they are doing something right. :shrug:
 
I bought my daughter an original Lomo to use as part of her A level photography course. She got some great results from it and it really is a back to basics camera.
I'm not sure there is that much of a market for a basic film camera at a premium price, I guess I'll find out when I come to sell it later. She doesn't want to keep it since she got her Nikon D3!
Allan
 
Interesting article, bit of a soft spot for the LC-A as it started me on the road of film photography. Ive now got 16 of them!
 
I bought my daughter an original Lomo to use as part of her A level photography course. She got some great results from it and it really is a back to basics camera.
I'm not sure there is that much of a market for a basic film camera at a premium price, I guess I'll find out when I come to sell it later. She doesn't want to keep it since she got her Nikon D3!
Allan

There's still a good market for them second-hand, you'll have no problem selling it, I would have thought it would go quickly if you stick it in the classifieds here. They seem to fetch between £70-100 on a well known auction site.
 
walsh said:
Interesting article, bit of a soft spot for the LC-A as it started me on the road of film photography. Ive now got 16 of them!

16? And I thought two Electro 35s was hoarding...
 
16? And I thought two Electro 35s was hoarding...

lol, the one I'm most proud of is the Lomo LC-M, the successor to the LC-A, less than 700 were made and it took me absolutely ages to get hold of one.

 
lol, the one I'm most proud of is the Lomo LC-M, the successor to the LC-A, less than 700 were made and it took me absolutely ages to get hold of one.


What's the difference between the A and the M?
 
From another another website

Apart from its looks, this camera has several major technical improvements over the LC-A. Firstly, its ISO goes up to 800, making it even better for shooting in dark/low-light conditions. This ISO setting comes with the cost of losing ISO25.

The camera also has a cable release screw-in hole. This is a very useful feature – I always found myself accidentally nudging or shaking my LC-A whilst holding the shutter button during long-exposures, leading to blurry pictures. It allows me to do self portraits thanks to a little clockwork shutter-release thingie I got. Or I can screw in a cable-release cord and do blur-free long exposures.

There are a few minor changes too – there is one light in the viewfinder (instead of the LC-A’s 2); it takes two batteries (instead of 3); the nearest focus is 0.9m (instead of 0.8); and the shutter mechanism is apparently better/more-reliable but I haven’t really noticed this.
 
People and this article always talk about how the lens gives you bright and crazy colours but surely this is a function of the film used and how it is processed?
 
mustanir said:
People and this article always talk about how the lens gives you bright and crazy colours but surely this is a function of the film used and how it is processed?

Yup, when used properly it gives quite good results. Just seems like everyone uses slide film and cross processes it.
 
Back
Top