Thanks Dave,I used XP1 and XP2 many year ago. These films use dyes coupled to the latent silver halide image. Given it is for B&W, they do not need the more complex layers required for colour. The over all effect is lower grain higher ISO. It was also convenient because I was also processing colour negatives so could use the same chemicals for both. Certainly XP2 was my favourite B&W film but I am sure that many traditionalist will dislike it for various reasons. I used to dislike grainy images.
Dave
It's fine. Especially for a quick test run... I used it a lot on deployments where only C-41 minilabs were available.
Quality will depend on the minilab used and how diligent the operator is in maintaining the chemistry.
Don't expect great scans from minilabs though... even the 'hi-res' option is poor compared to home scanning.
In case you haven't seen this:Ilford XP2 Super 24 Exposure 35mm Film
This B&W film is developed using the C41 process, I already do my own C41 developing for colour negs so I'm curious to try this out, has anyone used it?
Yup, since they're printing on colour paper and most operators couldn't be bothered to go into the Minilab printer settings and change them for one roll of film. The Fuji Frontier actually does a pretty decent job of it on Fujicolor Crystal Archive paper if you tweak the settings. You can save them as a preset for customers who regularly use XP-2.I used it a lot back in the film days.
I either got a sepia or a green cast from my lab developed photos
I have a couple of mates who would sell their kids for that landy...i regularly use it but 'Most' of mine is outdated so I downrate it to 250 ASA -- it gives good results -- I was GIVEN a FRESH 35mm 24Exp cassette by a Camera Club member which I keep in the Fridge for a 'Special Occasion Photo = Opportunity' !!
Feb 2007 dated XP2 400 Super 120 size in my 1950's British 'Ensign Selfix' 16/20 Model I with 75mm f4.5 'Ensar' lens at f5.6

