steveo_mcg
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 6,319
- Name
- Steven
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I've had my folder for a few weeks now and finally shot a roll in a quasi scientific method. I shot 5 frames of the subject under the same flat light using a "correct" exposure but a 5 different apertures, I was curious as to how sharp it was wide open vs stepped down. If any one is interested I can post the results but the difference between F11 and F3.5 is frankly startling, even f11 to f8 there is a noticeable increase at 1200 dpi.
My other test was to check the shutter speeds, unsurprisingly 1/10th down isn't right. 1/10th is definitely slower than 1/50th but I can't see any difference between 1/25 and 1/50 the histograms are almost identical. 1/100 seems to be faster than 1/50 and 1/300 might be ok.
I've found a site detailing the dismantling of the lens assembly but it removes it from the body with an improvised tool, I'm wondering if this is necessary or if I can clean the guts of the shutter mechanism in situ and if so what is the best method for cleaning out stuck mechanics.
I'm also wondering if I should just live with it I'm unlikely to need <1/25 as I'm too shaky to hand hold it and if need a tripod I'll like switch to *ahem* dijical so I can chimp it.
My other test was to check the shutter speeds, unsurprisingly 1/10th down isn't right. 1/10th is definitely slower than 1/50th but I can't see any difference between 1/25 and 1/50 the histograms are almost identical. 1/100 seems to be faster than 1/50 and 1/300 might be ok.
I've found a site detailing the dismantling of the lens assembly but it removes it from the body with an improvised tool, I'm wondering if this is necessary or if I can clean the guts of the shutter mechanism in situ and if so what is the best method for cleaning out stuck mechanics.
I'm also wondering if I should just live with it I'm unlikely to need <1/25 as I'm too shaky to hand hold it and if need a tripod I'll like switch to *ahem* dijical so I can chimp it.



