A
Alex S
Guest
Hi All,
I have a Canon 400D and have just replaced the kits lens with an EF 28-135mm IS. I have seen good reviews on here for the sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro and have seen a couple for sale second hand.
My questions are these; considering the focal range already covered by my new lens, is buying something that duplicates 70-135mm of that worth it?
Is it better to cross over the range of your lenses in case of problems at either end of the range or concentrate on ranges that you don't already have?
Eventually I would also like a wide-angle like the sigma 10-22mm and the canon 100m Macro.
Advice for a lens 'virgin' greatfully received. By the way, I cannot afford 'L' so please don't depress me by suggesting it
I have a Canon 400D and have just replaced the kits lens with an EF 28-135mm IS. I have seen good reviews on here for the sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro and have seen a couple for sale second hand.
My questions are these; considering the focal range already covered by my new lens, is buying something that duplicates 70-135mm of that worth it?
Is it better to cross over the range of your lenses in case of problems at either end of the range or concentrate on ranges that you don't already have?
Eventually I would also like a wide-angle like the sigma 10-22mm and the canon 100m Macro.
Advice for a lens 'virgin' greatfully received. By the way, I cannot afford 'L' so please don't depress me by suggesting it