Simple question, difficult answer. How would you go about getting your name out there and known. I have absolutely no idea but think it's time I started really giving it a go.
Known in what way, and known as what? If it's a commercial practice you wish to promote, then you just need to literally advertise and once you can afford it, advertise more widely - if you have a unique selling point beyond the others people will notice.
If it's a "name" you want to make for yourself, then you have to publish in some way. By publish I don't necessarily mean a book. I mean you need to publicly disseminate the work.
Publish. Here's the problem though, as most amateurs don't take images with that in mind, so they have nothing to publish. This is why you need to start thinking about a portfolio, or body or work instead of taking images one at a time with no relation to one another. Look at any well known photographer's web sites, and you'll see they are split up into separate projects or bodies of work. Not "Landscape", "People", "Cars" or random sh*t like that... but projects that are ABOUT something. Taking random images means you can't really publish anything or have an exhibition, as these tend to be themed. Working this way means that A) You're making work that is more likely to have an audience beyond other photographers, and B) has a greater chance of fitting in with the work of others for collective exhibitions, folio reviews and themed competitions. It also means the work is ABOUT something instead of just being a collection of pretty pictures.
Getting work reviewed by websites and magazines that showcase new work is the easiest way. However, those that offer the most exposure are also looking for contemporary, fresh work, and that tends to be the kind of work that gets a good kicking on here. I've no idea what kind of stuff you produce Ash, but if it's conventional stuff most amateurs take, then that's going to be your biggest problem. No matter how great amateurs think their images are (and many are excellent) there's just no interest in them beyond showing them to other amateur photographers.
Lens culture is probably one of the easiest to access review sites that is taken seriously and has a large audience.
Part of the problem is being isolated from the people who can help you. Start looking for, and following people and organisations who you would like to network and work with (Twitter and Instagram are good for this). Many will follow you back, and then you start getting news feeds for interesting things like exhibitions, shows, magazines and other platforms that can help you promote. Collective exhibitions are a good way too, and when your social media feeds are full of the right people and organisations, you'll start to get all the call to entries for the right kind of competitions and exhibitions. Getting work into a collective exhibition is a really great way to start, but you're not going to see the call for entries in here.. you need to develop that social network that has the right people in it.
It all boils down to the work though. If you've nothing worth publishing, then no one's going to care about it if you do. This is where once again the difference between the amateur and professional/Artist rears its head, and the thread will no doubt sink into a bitch fight... I'll just warm you all now, that is NOT my intent here, so if anyone is planning to start one of those "emperor's new clothes" arguments, just **** off, ok? I'm serious here... Unless you are VERY clever at marketing, and happen to tap into a market at the right time, you're probably never going to get known by producing the same stuff other amateurs do simply because there's so much of it out there; people are sick of seeing it. Sure, Peter Lik has done OK taking decorative stuff, and so has Cornish, but they were in at the ground floor, and were very clever at branding themselves. That's a hard act to follow, because the world doesn't need another Lik or Cornish.. one per continent is usually enough thank you very much.
If you do take amateur fodder... let's say for argument's sake, pictures of steam trains... you need to hit the specialist markets hard and get something published that you can advertise and push in those specialist markets. Maybe approach heritage railways to host an exhibition of your work or something. Start small, and off the back of each success, capitalise on it when you pitch for your next. The more you get published, the easier it is to get published again as your artist CV grows. Specialist markets are smaller though, for obvious reasons, but in the UK the market for photography is small any way, as we tend not to buy photography unless its a canvas portrait of a child. Photo books are a growing market however, but again, they're a market for those who think of imagery as art, not decorative art. Think Paris Photo... it attracted a couple of million people this year in one form or another, but look at the work on display there. A bet a fortune was made in photo book sales there, as there usually is. You gotta get your head out of the world forums like this promote and start thinking about what you shoot, not how good you think what you shoot is.
You got a link to your work? Website? Blog?
Most of this is luck. The right person seeing the right photo at the right time in the right place. It's getting all those elements together that's the hard bit. Oh, and then add some more luck.
No. It's not. You build your networks so you deliberately put your work in front of those most likely to be able to offer you something. The idea that it's pure luck is a nice thing amateurs like to believe in, as it gives them hope that its serendipity, not work that matters. Believing that means gives people hope that "any day now" they'll get "discovered". It's a myth: NO one's looking to "discover" photographers. Generally, no one gives a **** about photographers. We're not film stars or even vapid reality TV stars... no one cares about us, OK?
Oh.. one more piece of advice: Stop taking work to try and impress other photographers and to get likes on photography forums. You need to start MAKING work with all this in mind, and that's where the friction starts because most amateurs want to get "known" for taking what they're already taking despite whether it's publishable or not. When you tell them they need to change what they make, and go out of their comfort zone, and start thinking about what they shoot, they get a bit arsey and spit their dummies out because the world isn't fair. Look at what contemporary, cutting edge photography that IS getting published looks like, and understand where your work fits in that world.