Home-made Macro Lighting = £3.30

Jayceyned

Suspended / Banned
Messages
73
Edit My Images
Yes
Hey Guys,

I'm always posting asking questions so I've been wanting to post something that maybe useful to others without asking any questions, and I've finally got something worth sharing. Before I continue, I just want to point out that I am an amature so to all of the pro's out there with super-good equipment I apologise in advance for the crudeness of my solution; but I'm quite pleased with the results so I wanted to share.

Here's my home-made lighting solution for my macro attempts, using the built-in flash of my Canon 1000D:

5800062729_028abd740a_b.jpg


Fitted to the camera:
5800066815_c4e0d392bb_b.jpg


Positioned for use:
5800622722_6028dc6242_b.jpg



As I've mentioned I'm a beginner and am not taking good enough shots to warrant me spending big bucks on any equipment just yet as I'm still learning. I bought a set of secondhand extension tubes a while back and have been slowly picking up macro and decided that I needed more light as I could never shoot at aperature that gave me enough DOF. As I only have the standard 18-55 kit lens, my lens is practically touching my subjects when I'm really close up, so I didn't think that a ring flash would work for me so I got thinking about how I could fudge my way to a solution.

I bought a metre of 80mm Aluminium flexible ducting from ebay for just over 3 quid (http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=170641360727), trimmed it down slightly and sewed on 2 lengths of shoe lace to allow me to attach (ie. tie) it on to my camera. I also sewed 2 little areas where I trimmed the tube to make sure that it didn't continue to tear where I'd trimmed it.

Once the shoe laces or string are attached, the ducting hooks under the bottom molding of the built-in flash and the lace can be pulled down and looped under the camera base and over around the base of the lens or extension tubes and tied together; this should hold ond the ducting quite well and allow you to direct the end of the tube onto your subject with your spare hand.

Then you're done, ready to shoot. I've found that the best set up is setting the flash to +2 exposure and exposing the shots correctly by shooting at around 1/200 and f/14 or so. It's the only way that I've been able to shoot macro without any super-expensive equipment, handheld and at a slow enough aperature to get me more than a fraction of a mm depth of field. I've also found that directing the light from above onto my subject works quite nicely; it takes a bit of tinkering as you get drastically different results if the ducting isn't positioned perfectly.

I was quite happy with the shots that I got this morning, although I did get more than a few strange looks walking around the park with a big springy silver thing hanging off the top of my camera. Here are a few shots that I got by using my gizmo:

5800419900_602cc2a304_b.jpg


5799855177_88be5c64cb_b.jpg


5799848781_a849c9083c_b.jpg


Any comments ar criticism is more than welcome = I have a lot left to learn; and if I've not explained anything well enough let me know and I'll explain further.

Hope someone else finds it of some interest,

thanks,

Jay.
 
Last edited:
fab thanks, I have been wondering about Macro and this looks like something easy enough fo rme to try

great pics
 
Fantastic. Well done.
 
Blue Peter Badge. Definitely. And if I were you, I'd write to all the camera manufacturers and possibly retain a patent lawyer. This is a seriously good idea.
 
Which has just been fully disclosed ! Great idea though.
 
No worries = no intention of any patenting... I've heard that patent lawyers cam be quite expensive - haha. Thanks for the comments though, hope someone else gives it a go.
 
Ingenious! Just goes to show that you don't need to spend big bucks to get great results :)
 
:thumbs: Brilliant. And like all great ideas so simple you wonder why nobody else thought of it. Might be worth having a word with some manufacturer though, you could be onto something
 
Good idea! So simple...
 
Thanks for all of your kind words guys, I'd be keen to see any images if anyone does ever get round o making one.

Would be interesting to know whether there are any issue fitting it to anything iteration than a canon too.

Enjoy,

Jay.
 
the light looks fairly diffused but it still clearly coming from one side in at least 1 shot - a Y shaped light tunnel might even out the balance

would it be possible to create a branching version?
 
:cool::cool::cool:

When I see an invention like this the first thing that springs to mind is..

"why didn't I think of that"

:cool::cool::cool:
 
Wow really good idea!! have you tried combining this idea with plamps ? Maybe you can also modify it so you can split it into two so you could get a more balanced light as well? Or maybe that would mean too much light loss...
 
Excuse my ignorance but what are plamps?

Whatever they are, it sounds like a good idea regardless.

You could try splitting it but I was keen to keep it as simple as possible. You might need a 3rd hand to hold everything but I suppose it would be good for more static situations?
 
Wow. That is seriously good. Well done, and thanks for sharing it!
 
Great stuff! I can see another diy diffuser building session coming on:lol:
Thanks:thumbs:
 
im impressed the shots look great! im no macro god but i would be happy with those shots.
 
Excuse my ignorance but what are plamps?

Whatever they are, it sounds like a good idea regardless.

You could try splitting it but I was keen to keep it as simple as possible. You might need a 3rd hand to hold everything but I suppose it would be good for more static situations?


Here's a plamp - but these are expensive which would defeat the point. I've seen them made out of those electrical wire clamps and a bit of tough wire as well though...

And this is also why you won't need a 3rd hand!

http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-Wimberley-The-Plamp/p1005586?cm_mmc=GoogleBase-_-Tripods-and-Monopods-_-Tripod-Accessories-_-Wimberley-The-Plamp_1005586
 
anyone else tried this ? im interested in seeing some more pictures !
 
Thanks for the info. on the plamp, very cool.

Always good to find learn more, thanks again.
 
you are a true genius. Lovely pictures..Brilliant invention...
 
Wanted to resurrect this post as I've finally got around to developing the idea; and here it is:
6792315887_9975deb3b2_b.jpg


I did some research into how people got some amazing macro images and someone really kindly posted up an amazing video showing someone capturing awesome images. He used a homemade softbox so I got to work on creating my own. This time it cost around £8 (+ cost of a flash if you don't have one); consists of some mirrored card backed onto 1mm transparent acrylic, with a cotton diffuser on the end (cut up child's school shirt - 2 for £2' Sainsburys). I stitched it all together and Bob's your uncle.

Not had chance to properly test yet but will go fishing for some creatures on the weeken, and promise to post to see if I've delivered. It works with a reversed lens as well as one mounted on a full set of extension tubes; simply push fit over the flash head, no Velcro needed.

Next thing to try will be using some of the crazy iridescent card inside rather than standard mirrored card.

6792315289_e80d12a6d7_b.jpg

6792313407_62b9f28231_b.jpg


If anyone is interested I'd be happy to email the line work as a PDF so you can make your own? You guys have helped me out enough. Will hopefully post up again soon,

Jay.
 
Totally reminds me of a ringflash i made, and striplight and softbox lol
Nothing like a bit of diy! The ringflash worked wonders for close up portraits! Wouldn't take it anywhere wet though lol cardboard!
Drawing up plans for a beauty dish now for my monoblocks, should be fun
 
Genius. Certainly get the results your after too.

Im sure many people will now be trying this at the weekend :)
 
I think it was the Digital Camera guy that did this a few years ago, he used the more rigid flue pipe for the inside of chimneys though.
 
Super work and really well put together.
 
Brilliant job there I would be very interested in how you made this, Ive just got hold of some extension tubes and need to get more light.
 
If I hadn't just bought a ring flash 2 days ago I would have tried this and saved myself £285.00. Fab idea. I would seriously look at some sort of patent before someone else develops it further and steals your potential fortune!
 
Back
Top