OK, firstly I just want to apologise to Kerso/Ian for any trouble I have caused. At the time my head was a shed and I was so distraught I just couldn't bare to be without my camera. Again, I'm sorry. I set my expectations of you too high, I know that now.
Secondly, Canon finally collected my camera yesterday ... that's right Wednesday :shake: There was some confusion apparently. One person thought I was calling to arrange for it to be picked up by UPS, the other sent out some labels for me to use, and then call UPS for pick up. The first person was wrong and the second person forgot to tell me the labels were coming via recorded delivery. Now ordinarily this would be fine with anyone, but I can't get to the door in time for such an occasion. The only way for me to do that is if I have plenty of notice so I can go and sit and wait for the postman. So of course I missed the postman. When I called to let them at Canon know and to ask why they didn't tell me it was going to be recorded, I was told "It isn't normally, so I had no idea to tell you, I can only apologise"Anyway she redeemed herself by arranging for UPS to come within the following 2 hours having also arranged for the driver to come to my office window which I sit by.
I called today and asked if they had received my camera, though I already knew they had at 9:05am because I checked with UPS. I was told they had, and when the lady (Jackie mentioned in an earlier post) went to check she came back and told me that they were working on it as we spoke at 12:15pm. I pointed out to her that the letter enclosed with my camera to her ( and the fixers pointing out the problem, which included this problem, the unresponsive shutter button, and a tiny scratch on the preview screen( thought I would try my luck with that bit ... who knows)) stated that if they got my camera back to me by Saturday I would not pursue any complaints. She told me that it shouldn't be a problem. So roll on Saturday :sigh of relief smiley:.
What a nightmare. It seems everything has been working against me and my poor ickle 40D. When he gets home I am going to pamper him something rotten![]()
So it's not law then.. it's your company policy.
Exactly, his company refused to agree with the law. I had it 2 weeks, it blew up, surely it was not fit for purpose?
Avoid Comet, they suck very badly.
Gary.
Good luck Jo fingers crossed for SaturdayWhat a nightmare. It seems everything has been working against me and my poor ickle 40D. When he gets home I am going to pamper him something rotten![]()
Must be part of the induction training, Gary 400 miles South and a similar experiance (Oh and no shouting or swearingExactly, his company refused to agree with the law. I had it 2 weeks, it blew up, surely it was not fit for purpose?
Gary.
Good luck Jo fingers crossed for Saturday
Must be part of the induction training, Gary 400 miles South and a similar experiance (Oh and no shouting or swearing) Whilst I was trying to explain the fault, I just had a "grining idiot" who kept saying there is nothing I can do "Ad nauseam"
You know what? You guys are awsome. I have had so many people offer to loan me a camera, and your well wishes in this thread ... you guys simply are ... the best! Thank you so much everyone![]()
![]()
So it's not law then.. it's your company policy. Thats a big difference![]()
i didnt say it wasnt law just i didnt know where abouts its stated....
quite sure an international company like kesa would not adhere to the law so with edinburghs imature post and the admitance of swearing i i can see why the manager was unhelpfull
Good news on the 40D jo!
I like Comet.....I bought a 32" LCD from them after our 26" was stolen in a burglary. Went round the back of the store to pick it up and the warehouse guy gave us a 37" by mistake!:bonk:
i didnt say it wasnt law just i didnt know where abouts its stated....
quite sure an international company like kesa would not adhere to the law so with edinburghs imature post and the admitance of swearing i i can see why the manager was unhelpfull
<massive snip>
however after 28 days the law says <more snipage>

Ehh? :bonk:
I swore on my way out the door, and yup, how childish. Staff were still numpties, and clearly did not have a clue about customer service.
For 1 whole hour I tried my hardest to get my projector replaced, without swearing.
Gary.
swore on my way out of door, yep really?? i think it was a tad more than that if you were banned from the shop as you say!![]()
I called them this morning and was alarmed to be told it would be Monday before I got my camera 
Your order
Repair number: 1-08-31***
Postcode: PE20 ***
Your order number: FISHER
Status: Your repair has been completed as requested and is currently in transit.
POS Serial no. Article
001 0920****** EOS 40D BODY (EUR)
Roll on tomorrow I say!... as arranged my camera was going to be coming home to me tomorrow (Saturday) as promised via special UPS delivery
![]()
Roll on tomorrow I say!
Comments: Shutter Unit replaced. Optics and sensor cleaned.
Rep.-work: Cleaning :Body (parts)
Repair: Body (parts)
Adjustment: Body (parts)
Replacement: Body (parts)
Cleaning: CCD/CMOS
Spare Parts: Shutter Ass'y

you purchased it from kerso and its his responsibility to replace it
Hi marcel
as far as im aware the product was not fit for purpose as it only lasted 3 month and a such Jo was entitled to a refund....also theres another point to this if kerso had taken this onboard he would ,ve been in a far better position to broker a deal with Canon ie a new body, rather than leave it to the poor customer to sort out,posters earlier where jumping to his defence ''saying give him chance to do something before you complain'' but what exactly has he done ....nothing.I had a problem with a 40D took it back to Jessops 3 weeks later and they replaced body,that to me is the problem people dont know there rights and if you dont get satisfaction its quite cheap to take retailers through the small claims courts they have a duty to look after there customers but very few do,its ok quoting about a firms many satisfied customers who never had problems,however its not them we should be concerned about, its the ones which do have problems and never get satisfaction
it will be for the retailer to prove the goods did conform to contract (e.g. were not inherently faulty)