L
lauren_t
Guest
Lovely DoF on #5 and #2, and I like how the cat is on the 'prowl' in #6 


I won't comment on the shots themselves other than to say they're fine technically.
My comment is based on repeated comments by college lecturers. Shots of pets and homeless people were absolute no-no's for us. As an entry around a wildlife brief, sure I guess that'll work. But there's a chance the lecturer reviewing submissions will instantly think "Not another pet series..."
Lovely DoF on #5 and #2, and I like how the cat is on the 'prowl' in #6![]()
True enough. Go for it. If there's research/writing involved then that'll be as important as the shots themselves so package it all together well and you're golden.

Congratulations!
Darren - I do think a D200 would suit his developing talent and requirements. Oh well matey you may have to have the D300
Although... Don't forget to *borrow* the student discount when buying![]()
Congrats CameronI've just finished my photography A level, had my end of year show a couple of weeks back and am awaiting the results.
I must admit I was a little suprised with the entry requirements for you're course, I live in a very rural area so round here all courses are undersubscribed and it's more a case of 'show up and your in!'![]()

.....

Well done Cameron.....
Thought you would get in with those pics....... 55 pages was going some.....
I think you need to have a word with your dad and tell him you need full unconditional access to his camera bag and it's contents!!!
Looking forward to seeing more stuff from you - you have a natural talent and enthusiastic 'togger parents........![]()
It is a very good college and they are choosey about who gets on what course!

Yeah, I guessed that it may be an establishment with a little more prestige than the poor excuse we have for a college here.![]()
It is a really good college actually. I was quite impressed with their photography department. They have a nice studio (its better than mine!), product photography tables, a multitude of lighting options etc etc. They run Macs which is handy because we do to. Also being hard to get on the course means that people cannot get on to it as a filler subject and drag others down with them.
) and the computers were thin clients networked with an archaic server, you'd be lucky if you could even open a picture on one let alone edit it. There was also a lot of people using it as a doss course as you mention. That sounds awesome, I'm sure Cameron will thoroughly enjoy it. The sum total of our college's photographic gear was 3 Canon AE-1s and a couple of sony P&Ss (they've just got funding for a couple of DSLRs but they're buying sonys) and the computers were thin clients networked with an archaic server, you'd be lucky if you could even open a picture on one let alone edit it. There was also a lot of people using it as a doss course as you mention.
I was very lucky in that I had most of my gear before starting the course and the tutor was great despite the gear limitations, still can't wait for the chance to use some real gear at uni though.
actually the comments that have been made about pets not going down well with tutors i highly agree with!
a few months i had a college interview and i shown him my flower photography, he was highly impressed and gave me the placement on the spot. he also said that my presentation was best and my images were the best he had seen from all interviewees and the main reason was that most of the other people had submitted pictures of mobile phones on tables and pet pictures and said to me on the spot that half of them that they weren't even presented well and so they never stood a chance.
sorry to be hard on you but these aren't really college material didn't you have any other pictures of wildlife or flowers or portraits etc that you could have submitted. how did you present the images when you shown the tutor because like i said its a big thing.
He said that "half of them weren't presented well".... That will be why they didn't get in then !!
Most pet pictures would have likely been a picture of the dog sat on the settee etc.... Cameron's were not like that as you can see from the images he has posted.
His images demonstrate good control of depth of field, good composition etc and fulfil the brief.
It is not 'pet pictures' per se but the rubbish "not bothered to think about it" ones that are the issue.
The college were very happy with his well documented and very well presented entry to a highly over subscribed course.
I am sure some rubbish flower pictures wouldn't have got in either but you clearly put thought into yours as did Cameron.
Clearly they were good enough, as he got in and they said they were very happy with his entrance project. Pictures of flowers would not have fulfilled the brief which was to take pictures in a style of a photographer that inspires you. He does not get inspired by any flower photographers.
I would suggest that they took a lot more patience and skill than pointing a camera at a flower that is not even moving.
Doh.....
Looks like I need to find a D80 for him.............. or maybe a D300 for me and give him the D200![]()
well clearly he succeeded - or he wouldn't have been offered the place
of course he succeeded im just saying that even though he did it would have been better to exceed success after all thats the tutor he'll be working with for the next two years and you have to show true potential, they could have just took him on because they had spaces to fill.
of course he succeeded im just saying that even though he did it would have been better to exceed success after all thats the tutor he'll be working with for the next two years and you have to show true potential, they could have just took him on because they had spaces to fill.