Help me choose a landscape set up

osh

Suspended / Banned
Messages
391
Edit My Images
Yes
Sorry in advance for the long post...

I currently have a Fuji X100 (and a Bronica) which I predominantly use for landscape photography (examples here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/oshrees/).

I've been thinking for a while though and would like a lens that's wider than the 35mm equivalent on the Fuji - maybe somewhere in the region of 20mm. This would mean that I would need to buy a new camera and lens, and I can't decide what to buy. In terms of SLRs I would prefer a Nikon as I have a D40 with kit lens so am familiar with how they work. I should also say that I would be using the camera on a tripod with the lowest ISO setting and would like to use filters. I would also like to be able to print some pictures up to A2 or even bigger.

I could afford around £2,000 and current options I've been considering would include:

- Nikon D700 (quite reasonably priced now) and a 20mm prime - Nikon or Voigtlander, or even perhaps stretch to the Zeiss 21mm?

- Fuji X-Pro 1 once the 14mm lens comes out (though not convinced about this as I would prefer something weatherproof)

- Save up for the D800 and again get a 20mm prime for the time being (though I'm worried that maybe they wouldn't be up to the sensor)

- Get a DX camera like the D7000 with the Nikon 10-24mm - but have read that full frame would give nicer quality images?

What do you think, and are there any other options that I should consider?

Many thanks!
 
If youre going to go DX route with the D7000 then theres really only one option in my book for a lens and thats the Tokona 11-16mm

Full frame would be Nikon D700 with Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR
 
Thanks Gary. So would you say that the 16-35mm would give better image quality than a prime?
 
The Nikon 16-35mm is stunning. Add that to a D700 and you'll be smiling all the way.
 
If you are considering the D7000, what about the Sony A77?

- £1000 for the body
- Goes as low as ISO 50
- 24MP resolution (clean at low ISO)
- 3 way articulated rear screen (handy for tripod work)
- Using the rear for live-view is identical to using the viewfinder, with Phase detect AF
- Useful 'focus peaking' ability and focus enlargement to check critical focus
- Weather sealed
- In-body IS (so all lenses get IS for handheld work)
- FF sized viewfinder (Electronic OLED) can show approx current exposure live
- Has histogram, orientation and other useful live overlays through EVF/Rear screen

Sony has some decent glass as well as CZ stuff, and adapters for a wide range of MF options.

Just for reference, LL was very happy with the NEX7 which uses the same sensor as the A77 and basically shares a lot of features with it....
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/sony_nex_7_rolling_review.shtml#closing
 
Last edited:
If you are considering the D7000, what about the Sony A77?

- £1000 for the body
- Goes as low as ISO 50
- 24MP resolution (clean at low ISO)
- 3 way articulated rear screen (handy for tripod work)
- Using the rear for live-view is identical to using the viewfinder, with Phase detect AF
- Useful 'focus peaking' ability and focus enlargement to check critical focus
- Weather sealed
- In-body IS (so all lenses get IS for handheld work)
- FF sized viewfinder (Electronic OLED) can show approx current exposure live
- Has histogram, orientation and other useful live overlays through EVF/Rear screen

Sony has some decent glass as well as CZ stuff, and adapters for a wide range of MF options.

Just for reference, LL was very happy with the NEX7 which uses the same sensor as the A77 and basically shares a lot of features with it....
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/sony_nex_7_rolling_review.shtml#closing

Thanks phil-t. Had never thought of Sony before, and will definitely have a look!
 
BTW I know samples vary but my 16-35mm is better than the 18mm (AI) 20mm (AI/AFD) and 24mm (AI/S, AFD) that I've owned.
 
Agree with the D700 and 16-35 although if a Zeiss 21mm is a possibility then I'd personally go for that instead.
 
BTW I know samples vary but my 16-35mm is better than the 18mm (AI) 20mm (AI/AFD) and 24mm (AI/S, AFD) that I've owned.

Great to hear that Mike...I have one waiting for me when i get home...cant wait to give it a run out.:cool:
 
Back
Top