Getting married, very small ceremony, different kind of wedding photographer

It just seems an odd choice for someone that you would assume has an interest in photography. It makes sense to assume that for someone interested in photography that photography would be important to them, especially for a one off day like a wedding.

Personally I didn't engage a wedding photographer for my own wedding. Professional or formal photographs of the event were not important to me. We enjoyed collating the photographs provided by the guests and in retrospect some of the photographs have as much value to us because of who captured it as much as who is in it.

However that doesn't mean I don't admire good wedding photography or recognise its value. And if a relative or friend came to ask advice then I'd happily point out that if it is important to them and has value to them that they engage a photographer who will deliver that for them.
 
Glad it worked out for you, but I wouldn't be getting married personally to gain a tax advantage.


Well the Govt and the entire gay community would strongly disagree with you.

That is one of the foremost reasons why there was such a protracted fight about gay marriages and the incumbent tax benefits.

That's where the 'civil partnership' fudge came from. Which was then extended to straight couples who wanted the tax benefits without marrying
and then formal marriage was extended to the gay community (which should have happened in the first place).

Your accountant would also be having fairly strong words with you if yo were in Nod's position.
 
Well the Govt and the entire gay community would strongly disagree with you.

That is one of the foremost reasons why there was such a protracted fight about gay marriages and the incumbent tax benefits.

That's where the 'civil partnership' fudge came from. Which was then extended to straight couples who wanted the tax benefits without marrying
and then formal marriage was extended to the gay community (which should have happened in the first place).

Your accountant would also be having fairly strong words with you if yo were in Nod's position.
Money comes and goes I wouldn’t get married for financial reasons. Each to their own.
 
Money comes and goes I wouldn’t get married for financial reasons. Each to their own.


Then, with respect, you don't have enough money to worry about.

When a tax bill is heading over half a million quid, on income that you will have already paid tax on, then sensible planning is required.
 
Then, with respect, you don't have enough money to worry about.
What a completely obnoxious and stupid thing to say. :D

You make a habit of that on here to be fair.
 
Last edited:
Money comes and goes I wouldn’t get married for financial reasons. Each to their own.


I should point out that it wasn't entirely for tax purposes - that was just the thing that made the decision easier. We've been a couple for close to 40 years now, more of them as common law than with the certificate. Had the civil partnership been open to us as a straight couple, we'd have gone down that route.
 
I should point out that it wasn't entirely for tax purposes - that was just the thing that made the decision easier. We've been a couple for close to 40 years now, more of them as common law than with the certificate. Had the civil partnership been open to us as a straight couple, we'd have gone down that route.

I am not being critical of you at all buddy. Each to their own and all that. Personally for myself when I got married I did it because I really wanted to. I wouldn’t personally get married for any other reason.
 
Not everyone wants pictures of themselves, and if money needs saving then it might be an area that's expendable?
While your probably right.
I find brides and grooms grumbling about the cost, can we cut the second photographer out, how much for a smaller album and so on trying to get the price down. Then when I do the wedding, I find they have a £300 balloon arch, £500 for a fire pit at the venue, £350 sweet trolly, £400 chocolate fountain the list goes on...
The last wedding I did they paid £500 just to sit in a rowing boat for about 10 minutes to have some pictures taken by me, that wasn't my cost, thats what the venue charged for them to actually sit in the 10foot boat on a lake.
The ONLY thing they have after the wedding to show for the cost are my photos, and the wedding dress, why scrimp on those?.
 
Prints are invaluable, she has something to cut in half when it all goes horribly wrong.
 
Last edited:
While your probably right.
I find brides and grooms grumbling about the cost, can we cut the second photographer out, how much for a smaller album and so on trying to get the price down. Then when I do the wedding, I find they have a £300 balloon arch, £500 for a fire pit at the venue, £350 sweet trolly, £400 chocolate fountain the list goes on...
The last wedding I did they paid £500 just to sit in a rowing boat for about 10 minutes to have some pictures taken by me, that wasn't my cost, thats what the venue charged for them to actually sit in the 10foot boat on a lake.
The ONLY thing they have after the wedding to show for the cost are my photos, and the wedding dress, why scrimp on those?.

I rather suspect that a couple who needs to save a few hundred quid on photographs won't be spending £10K+ on a wedding. If I were to do it again - fairly unlikely at this stage - then quietly slipping away and coming back as Mr. and Mrs. would be my preference.
 
What a completely obnoxious and stupid thing to say. :D


Not really. If you were HNW, unmarried with a long term partner then being married makes total financial sense...

...right up until the divorce of course.

If you don't have the sort of resources that would attract a significant wedge of tax on your death, then it's not something that you are going to be concerned about.

If you do have those level resources, then you almost certainly would look at how to reduce the tax burden.

That's a simple factual assessment.
 
Not really. If you were HNW, unmarried with a long term partner then being married makes total financial sense...

...right up until the divorce of course.

If you don't have the sort of resources that would attract a significant wedge of tax on your death, then it's not something that you are going to be concerned about.

If you do have those level resources, then you almost certainly would look at how to reduce the tax burden.

That's a simple factual assessment.

Let's be honest it was just you, being your usual charming self. :D

As usual it was completely obnoxious. Have you ever contributed anything positive on here? If so I haven't seen it.
 
I rather suspect that a couple who needs to save a few hundred quid on photographs won't be spending £10K+ on a wedding. If I were to do it again - fairly unlikely at this stage - then quietly slipping away and coming back as Mr. and Mrs. would be my preference.

Not too many people having a 10k wedding these days. While you can get married for a lot less than that, for the big wedding it will be more like 30-40k easily.

Photo is not a priority for everyone. We shot a wedding last week that cost at a guess considering the cost of the venue would have been way over 100k and they tried to bargain us down on silly things, that is is a red flag for me so I was happy to let it go but they came back and booked anyway. They spent 3k on having the bar open till 4 a.m, 2.5k on breakfast on the day of the wedding just for the bridal party that was getting ready there that nobody ate and 7k on breakfast for the day after the wedding which i would be surprised if anyone ate considering the bar was open till 4 a.m. Their second day celebration at the venue alone cost just under 38k which didn't include the all day entertainment they had, never mind the wedding day itself. They still tried to bargain down our pricing which was only 3k. I only know some of the prices they paid because they sent us through a 20 page document from the venue that as well as having the timeline had the pricing for all of the extra's they had chosen.

When it comes to weddings people will spend on what is important to them, which is off course the right thing to do. At 3k we were probably the cheapest photographers to ever have worked at that venue. Photo just wasn't a priority for that couple, they gave us 10 minutes for all portraits including the bridal party. It was the exact same story for the videographers and content creators as well, they tried to bargain them down too. They weren't really interested in having any of us there, but they booked us and them anyway probably more for it looking odd if they hadn't.

We used to turn weddings like this away as in an ideal world we didn't want to put our time and energy into a wedding were photo was not a priority but weddings like that are fairly handy as less work to do on the day.

As I mentioned before we have also shot weddings were for the couple photo was a priority and what they paid us wasn't much less than the rest of their entire wedding budget. Early this year we shot a wedding for a couple who got married in a forest owned by a family friend, they did all the decor etc. themselves and had their reception in the function room of a local restaurant. I don't know what their wedding cost but I would imagine under 5k, the brides dress even was her grandmothers dress that she just paid to have altered. They booked our most expensive package without any consideration on cost because photo was important to them. We even worked less hours than we normally would at a wedding.
 
Last edited:
Not too many people having a 10k wedding these days. While you can get married for a lot less than that, for the big wedding it will be more like 30-40k easily.

Just wow. Ours was probably about a grand all in - good value for 44 years so far. It makes me wonder if people understand why they are gettting married, especially considering how little time some last.
 
The length of time a marriage seems to last is inversely proportional to the amount spent on it.
 
Not too many people having a 10k wedding these days. While you can get married for a lot less than that, for the big wedding it will be more like 30-40k easily.
Just wow. Ours was probably about a grand all in - good value for 44 years so far. It makes me wonder if people understand why they are gettting married, especially considering how little time some last.

I got married in 2019 - I took the Friday off work to drive to Gretna Green. Wedding was Saturday afternoon, we got there for about 1445 and we were back in the hotel bar for 1600 having fish & chips and pornstar martinis, phoning our parents and posting on facebook that we were married :)
While we were eating our dinner, there was another wedding party there and we kept hearing exasperated cries of "where's Aunty Gladys? He wants all the female relatives now" and "will someone tell Uncle Peter that he needs to be in the car park!" and suchlike, making us feel ever so smug that we'd avoided all that :)

@DrPips are you married yet? How did it go?
 
Hi all, I recently got engaged and my fiancé and I have just started planning our wedding.

Now it’s both of our second weddings so we’re having a very small ceremony (12-15 people including us) and it’s going to be very informal. The plan is in the morning to go for a walk and a couple of pints, back to the venue (country pub) for a mid afternoon ceremony, then nice meal and drinks in the evening. Because of this we want a similar level of informality from the photos and we certainly don’t want to be spending £700-£1000 on a photographer which seems to be the going rate for a micro wedding.

I have absolutely no doubt that the photographers earn and are worth this amount of money but it’s just not something we value particularly highly, especially when we’re looking at spending around £4-5k total.

Having said that, we would like some record of the day, so I was wondering if anyone had any suggestions? My fiancé thought about contacting the local university and seeing if there were any students looking to develop their portfolios?

We’re planning on getting married in the Lake District if that has any effect.

What do you think?
I think you should do as others have suggested and find a friend or work colleague to take a few nice shots for you. Iv done a couple of weddings as a student and there's no way of stripping the cost even at basic level, insurance, travel costs, time shooting and post editing and organising and planning. Most pro photographers will follow this basic form and won't compromise to downgrade their work. Hope you find someone and have a nice day.
 
Just wow. Ours was probably about a grand all in - good value for 44 years so far. It makes me wonder if people understand why they are gettting married, especially considering how little time some last.

It’s all relative I guess. While for some people the cost of a wedding might seem obscene for others spending a mad amount of money they don’t even blink.

I personally don’t like to see couples over extending themselves to get married just to keep up with the Jones that does sometimes happen but most people are sensible enough to spend what is affordable for them.

A lot of people on this forum are older people as well so don’t understand how much stuff costs for a wedding. Brides dress for example can often be thousands of pounds.

What cost you 1k might cost 10-15k now.

We got married 16 years ago and ours cost about 9k and it was a t sensibly priced venue and cars were supplied free of charge by my uncle.

Food prices in particular for weddings are staggering even really bad wedding food is about £65-75 a head.
 
Last edited:
What cost you 1k might cost 10-15k now.
I apprecuate that. We were really careful - dress we pre-owned and came from a hire place (closing because the owners were divorcing), pictures by a friend, grotty hall in Croydon, evening disco by a mate from work etc. biggest expense was about £500 for catering, and we did the evening food between the families.
 
I rather suspect that a couple who needs to save a few hundred quid on photographs won't be spending £10K+ on a wedding. If I were to do it again - fairly unlikely at this stage - then quietly slipping away and coming back as Mr. and Mrs. would be my preference.
The venue cost 37k, thats without the extras like the boat, and fire pit and stuff. The 37k was the service, reception and 3 largish chalets. (which were more like the bunk houses we used to rent for photo courses with cost a few hundred a night) it'c crazy money. Oh and they paid £800 I think for a VW bus to arrive have some pics and go. Think I might buy one. ;)
 
I think spending all that money on a wedding is day is utter madness. It’s like those people who spend £1K a month to have a flash Range Rover to only give it back - I’d rather have all that money to pay off my mortgage early and retire whilst I’m not decrepit and not working until I’m dead and to worry about putting the heating on and spend all that for just day. Maybe it’s me that mad.

I was talking to somebody at work recently who got married over the summer and mentioned how our whole wedding cost about 8K in 2007 and he commented that his catering alone cost more than that… it’s just bonkers.

I did look up - apart from over Covid, marriage rates continues to decline - if that’s the cost of it today, and younger generations are still living with parents or having to rent, then it’s easy to see why..

Some friends of ours recently had a civil partnership (they are a hetro couple) and that was literally a short ceremony and then off to the pub and a meal later - all for under a grand all in and they get all the benefits of a traditional marriage for a fraction of the cost.
 
Hi all, I recently got engaged and my fiancé and I have just started planning our wedding.

Now it’s both of our second weddings so we’re having a very small ceremony (12-15 people including us) and it’s going to be very informal. The plan is in the morning to go for a walk and a couple of pints, back to the venue (country pub) for a mid afternoon ceremony, then nice meal and drinks in the evening. Because of this we want a similar level of informality from the photos and we certainly don’t want to be spending £700-£1000 on a photographer which seems to be the going rate for a micro wedding.

I have absolutely no doubt that the photographers earn and are worth this amount of money but it’s just not something we value particularly highly, especially when we’re looking at spending around £4-5k total.

Having said that, we would like some record of the day, so I was wondering if anyone had any suggestions? My fiancé thought about contacting the local university and seeing if there were any students looking to develop their portfolios?

We’re planning on getting married in the Lake District if that has any effect.

What do you think?
Congratulations on your engagement! I completely understand wanting to keep things relaxed and informal, especially with a small wedding. Most of the weddings I photograph are intimate celebrations like yours, and I’ve found that even small events deserve to be documented with care. While it’s tempting to look for cheaper options, it’s worth remembering that professional photographers put in a lot of unseen work — from preparation and equipment to editing afterwards — and that’s why their rates reflect more than just the hours on the day. If photography isn’t your top priority, you might consider a shorter coverage package rather than a student photographer, so you still get professional quality but within a smaller budget. That way you’ll have images that truly capture the spirit of your day, without compromising on the value of the work.
 
I think spending all that money on a wedding is day is utter madness. It’s like those people who spend £1K a month to have a flash Range Rover to only give it back - I’d rather have all that money to pay off my mortgage early and retire whilst I’m not decrepit and not working until I’m dead and to worry about putting the heating on and spend all that for just day. Maybe it’s me that mad.

I was talking to somebody at work recently who got married over the summer and mentioned how our whole wedding cost about 8K in 2007 and he commented that his catering alone cost more than that… it’s just bonkers.

I did look up - apart from over Covid, marriage rates continues to decline - if that’s the cost of it today, and younger generations are still living with parents or having to rent, then it’s easy to see why..

Some friends of ours recently had a civil partnership (they are a hetro couple) and that was literally a short ceremony and then off to the pub and a meal later - all for under a grand all in and they get all the benefits of a traditional marriage for a fraction of the cost.

You are such a romantic :D

What seems like expensive to you is relative.

As mentioned earlier in this thread we recently shot a wedding that cost well over 100k.

100k to that couple would be like 1k to another couple. If you have 30 million quid in the bank 100k is not a lot of money.

Weddings are largely driven by the bride. A lot of brides have been dreaming about their wedding since they were young and it’s important for them to have the best day of their lives. The grooms for the most part just try to do everything they can to facilitate that. I should say that is not the case for younger couples often both of them are heavily invested in having the big wedding day, that is what they both want.

You are a very jaded lot here partly because the forum is largely made up of old grumpy men.

If the bride and groom want to do a small wedding and and are only interested in avoiding tax or just want to get married as cheap as possible they can do that and there is nothing wrong with that.. However if somebody wants their wedding day to be the best day of their lives, the biggest party they have ever had and to share it with all of their family and friends their is nothing wrong with that either.

While in your opinion they should use the money for retirement or for paying of a mortgage, that’s not a great option if they walk out the front door tomorrow and get run over by a bus. The reason you feel that way is probably because those are the things that concern you.

Life is for living, you could drop dead tomorrow morning. I won’t begrudge anyone having the big party and creating memories that will last the rest of their lives.

Here is a scenario for you. You meet someone, you decide to get married and the bride has been dreaming of their wedding day from she was a young girl. You brow beat her into accepting a registry office wedding and a visit to the pub so you can pay extra money of your mortgage. You drop dead a week later and your widow then later moves in a new boyfriend into the house you paid for. They end up having the big wedding. That worked out well for you. Which of her weddings do you think she is going to remember most?
 
Last edited:
My first wedding (as groom) was a big affair - my first wife was a one for showing off I guess. Hired a local tithe barn as venue, outside caterers, a local disco guy, it was all organised by her and her mum. I just played a bit part in the proceedings - I was ordered to book the car but was told which one was wanted. The photography was interesting; wife's uncle was chief photographer for the local paper but he refused because he wanted to enjoy the day not work, and it wasn';t his thing anyway (sensible chap). So the MiL arranged for a friend of hers to do it, who was also a professional photographer - he did scene of crime shots for the police, mostly of stiffs and surroundings! I'd guess ythat the 1980 cost of that was around @2k, largely thanks to her insisting on 100 guests and a 3-course lunch/wedding breakfast.
My second wedding in 2006 was completely organised by me. I gave my wife a £1200 budget for the dress and accoutrements, which she only slightly exceeded and it was a lovely USA designer dress. The venue was a country house hotel in Worcestershire which I booked out for 1 night for some of the guests who weren't local plus ourselves; they did the catering too. I won't go on with all the details, but we had an ex-BBC videographer, a couple from Worcester who did a pre-shoot plus the day with great album, CD and other bits for £800 but I wasn't going to compromise on that element. Car was a Morse-type Jag Mk2, £300. 36 guests. Total cost for everything was about £12k and it was fantastic.

I'll never do it again, but if I were to do so, I'd estimate to spend at least 10% of my budget on photography and videography. It is so worth having all those memories captured. Although we haven';t looked at our photos for years now, the album isn't in the attic it's here in my office on the bookshelves, just seeing it there gives me a wam feeling. The video was superb and that has been watched a few times over the years. It's easy to become jaded and take things for granted as you get older and your marriage becomes a bit stale, but those moments bring back some of the thrill and warmth of feeling, and I'm grateful to have those triggers still available.
 
Last edited:
It's an interesting range of perspectives. For me, a wedding is part of the slightly awkward processes you are expected to navigate in order to actually marry the person you want to spend your life with. In many ways it's a darn nuisance, but socially it has to be done in order for the good stuff to become even better. When you're young, as a male I think you just do it because that's what people do, and as you get older you realise the party is just trivial because it's the commitment that actually matters. So many spend huge amounts of money for something they'll walk away from in a couple of years because they thought the party was the reality, rather than the day to day life with someone.

It's not the external stuff that matters in the end, but only the real things. I'm forever grateful I didn't marry a Disney princess.
 
You are a very jaded lot here partly because the forum is largely made up of old grumpy men.
The thing about living longer is that you learn more.

Some poet, I've long forgotten who, wrote that "the arrogance of youth falters upon the wisdom of age". This explains why we get grumpier as we get older - watching the young repeat our own mistakes instead of listening to our warnings is inclined to jade the sunniest of dispositions.

Just wait. The time is coming when you will join our ranks and grump with the best of us...

Older man at Swindon Mela CAN_4218.jpg
 
It's an interesting range of perspectives. For me, a wedding is part of the slightly awkward processes you are expected to navigate in order to actually marry the person you want to spend your life with. In many ways it's a darn nuisance, but socially it has to be done in order for the good stuff to become even better. When you're young, as a male I think you just do it because that's what people do, and as you get older you realise the party is just trivial because it's the commitment that actually matters. So many spend huge amounts of money for something they'll walk away from in a couple of years because they thought the party was the reality, rather than the day to day life with someone.

It's not the external stuff that matters in the end, but only the real things. I'm forever grateful I didn't marry a Disney princess.
I am honestly surprised there are so many jaded people here I guess this thread has sort of turned into a more if couples should spend money on their wedding type thread which is grand.

As a photographer of course we see a lot of different types of wedding some were people go all in for both what I would personally consider right and wrong reasons. While others go for much more intimate weddings. It's all good.

From a personal point of view when we got married it was important for both me and wife to have as large a celebrations as we could afford without getting into debt and we did. We didn't have a huge wedding in terms of the amount of people there, with less than 100 guests. We did however have all of the important people there plus some great uncles and aunts of mine who were important to me. I don't regret a penny of what we spent and my regret is only that we couldn't spend more. We had a crap D.J because that was what we could afford and our photographer was not great either. My parents paid for photography and I made the mistake of just telling them to sort it as I wasn't sure how much they could afford to spend. Those are the two things we would both change. A much better D.J and a much better photographer. Even though our photographer was not great, our photos are one of our most important possessions. Both of our dads have since died, my wife's grandmother has died and all of my great uncles and aunties have died, the photos from our wedding are some of the few that we have of them.

The party was important to us, we were party people. :cool: It remains one of the very best parties I have been too and people still talk about it now even though our D.J was not the best. So many great memories from that day, yeah there was all the romance, like the beautiful outdoor ceremony. We have been married nearly 20 years and people still tell us it was the best wedding they have ever been too. There was also some great memories like how we went to bed, then later in the night I went back down to the hotel bar at about 3 a.m and met up with my mates and we partied all night, through to the next morning at breakfast. Stuff that wouldn't be important to some but things getting threatened with getting thrown out of the hotel as we had like 40 people in a room partying hard at 5 a.m and were smoking cigars and got fined by the hotel. Silly stuff like my cousins shoes going missing, the bar running out of Jack Daniels, one of my cousins running around licking womens feet :puke:, and a ton of stuff that I just can't mention here. Was an amazing day we will both never forget.

In regard to if photography is worthwhile investing in or not you could say being a wedding photographer I am biased but I am biased for personal reasons not business. As well as for my own reasons, before my Dad died, in a temper my my brother tore my parents wedding album apart and attempted to burn it. After my dad died I spent a long time carefully photographing all of the images and repairing them digitally before eventually having a brand new album reprinted. I gifted it to my mum on their next wedding anniversary. As I wanted it to look as close as possible to their original album and I had to pay someone to help with some of the editing it came in at around the cost of a mid price point wedding photographer. It was some of the best money i have ever spent. my mum cried, I cried, the wife cried. It is far and away my mums most prized possession. Memories are important and anything that gives a little nudge to remembering them are important as well for me.
 
Last edited:
The thing about living longer is that you learn more.

Some poet, I've long forgotten who, wrote that "the arrogance of youth falters upon the wisdom of age". This explains why we get grumpier as we get older - watching the young repeat our own mistakes instead of listening to our warnings is inclined to jade the sunniest of dispositions.

Just wait. The time is coming when you will join our ranks and grump with the best of us...

Ooh I am definitely a grumpy old man already.

However instead of worrying about tomorrow, for me it's important to live in the moment. Planning for a future that might not exist is in the most part pretty futile. Spend your money when you have the opportunity to enjoy it. Make the memories, here today, gone tomorrow.
 
I think the cost of the wedding mostly started with my post.
I wasn't concerned so much on the rights and wrongs of spending a lot of money on getting married. I was refering to the BG cutting corners on the cost of the photos, then spending more on a chocolate fountain or whatever. The photos and the dress are ALL they have after to look back on.
To me that makes them more important than balloons or a singing waiter, a magician or a fun fair....
If someone want to spend 100k on a wedding thats fine with me, but dont try to knock down my price to penny pinch ;) I do bargin... but I bargin upwards, it gets rid of the time wasters.
 
Given that a low budget is your non negotiable. Have you contacted your local camera club - there may be someone there who might be willing to do it for you
At my camera club, we occasionally get such request but never take it up because a. we do not like being taken advantage of and b. it is stealing business from local professionals. I agree that wedding photos can be overrated. Apart from immediately after we received them, we did not look at our photos again until our 50th anniversary.

Dave
 
Back to the original post - a friend of mine had a small wedding like that, registry office/parents house/pub etc. Rather than booking a photographer a couple of us were asked to make Sur we brought our cameras, and a group album was set up for photos to be uploaded to. I used it as an excuse to buy a new lens, and I believe another one of my mates used it to justify a 5Dmk4. The couple were happy with the photos (and are still together).
 
Back to the original post - a friend of mine had a small wedding like that, registry office/parents house/pub etc. Rather than booking a photographer a couple of us were asked to make Sur we brought our cameras, and a group album was set up for photos to be uploaded to. I used it as an excuse to buy a new lens, and I believe another one of my mates used it to justify a 5Dmk4. The couple were happy with the photos (and are still together).

So hilariously you basically paid for the benefit of taking some photos at their wedding. :D

Have seen this before on here, always seems a bit bizarre and is always hilarious to me. I remember someone on here a few years ago that went out and spent about 5-6k so he could take photos at a friends wedding. All so his friends could cheap out on having a proper photographer.

A few years ago someone messaged us on Instagram asking could they hire some of our equipment so they could photograph their friends wedding, obviously we said no. He was a wildlife photographer, seen the photos after they were absolute lolz, he should have stuck to wildlife.
 
The thing about living longer is that you learn more.

Some poet, I've long forgotten who, wrote that "the arrogance of youth falters upon the wisdom of age". This explains why we get grumpier as we get older - watching the young repeat our own mistakes instead of listening to our warnings is inclined to jade the sunniest of dispositions.
I'll see your poet and re-quote my own favourite with a similar line of thought:
I never dared be radical when young
For fear of being Conservative when old

[Robert Frost]
On wedding music, each to their own tastes obviously, but in my second go, we hired a string quartet for the church and during the meal, and a jazz trio for afterwards. They were both brilliant and not that expensive (can't recall exactly, but a few hundred each I think. I'm keen to support real musicians. I also bought 20-odd copies of the jazz trio's CD to give to guests.

I did cover one wedding myself very many years ago. A friend having a register office thing and small pagan ceremony amongst some old oak trees. I shot a couple of rolls of Kodacolour on my then Pentax Spotmatics. They turned out ok and the couple had a few in frames around their house for some years afterwards. The marriage didn't last, but it wasn't my fault!
 
...seen the photos after they were absolute lolz, he should have stuck to wildlife.
Beauty, the sages tell us, lies in the eye of the beholder.

...it's entirely possible that the couple and their families were very pleased with the images they received.
 
At my camera club, we occasionally get such request but never take it up because a. we do not like being taken advantage of and b. it is stealing business from local professionals. I agree that wedding photos can be overrated. Apart from immediately after we received them, we did not look at our photos again until our 50th anniversary.

Dave
I always claimed people look at the wedding album five times (mostly)
One, when they get it,
Two, when aunty Maud who wasn't at the wedding visits,
Three, the first aniversary of the wedding (if they remember the date).
Four, after a big fight.
Five, when one is cutting the other out of the pictures after the divorce.

I know I'm an old jaded cynic, but I've been married. As the great Groucho once said. "Marriage is a wonderful institution... But who wants to live in an institution?"

Still it's paid the bills....... ;)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Sky
Beauty, the sages tell us, lies in the eye of the beholder.

...it's entirely possible that the couple and their families were very pleased with the images they received.

Regardless if the couple were happy with them or not that doesn't mean they weren't crap. :D
 
Regardless if the couple were happy with them or not that doesn't mean they weren't crap. :D
One person's manure is another person's wealth... ;)
 
Back
Top