Future (affordable) classics?

Techy Guy

Suspended / Banned
Messages
489
Name
Rob
Edit My Images
No
What current cameras will become classics in the future, icons of style and design, groundbreaking technology perhaps? Leica no doubt and some of the other top end brands spring to mind but any suggestions for some more afforable models too?
 
The Fuji X100 is already staking it's case as a modern classic.
 
I agree the X100 was a game changer and will be a classic someday.
Ok it's far from perfect but it opened up the eyes of other manufacturers to start putting effort into design and innovate.
Rumours are Fuji is going to release a firmware update for the x100 towards end of the month.
I'm keeping even though I hardly use it, it just oozes class.
Mine is one of the rare first batch models to hit the UK and I have had a special hand crafted presentation to put it in ;)

Riz
 
X100 was top of my list too when I posted the question. I don't have one yet but very keen to get one, not just for it's photographic potential but because of it's styling and class!
 
Golly :thinking:

Canon 20D, a useable camera and a bit more responsive than the previous 10D.
5D, the first affordable full frame camera.
Nikon D700, I've never used one but they seem... good.
Panasonic GF1, a nice design.
Panasonic G1, perhaps one of the best handling cameras I've ever used.
Epson RD1, the first digital RF.
Sony RX1.
Nex 6, 7.
Fuji X series.
 
5D without a doubt, perhaps I shouldn't have sold mine. 10D possibly, fist of its type?
 
D90. Even now, it sells out at any used dealer. Two control wheels, AF motor, flash controller - it's a perfect inducement into DSLR Land, with so much more possible, not to mention low light performance that even now remains competitive.

If Nikon have ever had a classic DSLR, I'd contend the D90 is it.
 
I think the notion of classic digital camera, in the way we look at old film cameras, may not even be possible, and attitudes towards them altered.

In the days of film, a good camera could remain a good camera as long as it was looked after and it's film available.

I have an old bellows 120 camera with Ziess lens; fully mechanical, and in good condition, I could stick a fresh film in it and go use it, tomorrow, despite being over fifty years old.

I have a Minox sub-mini... that's pretty much a display cabinet bit of obje-da, due to rare battery and even rarer cartridge film! This is more likely to be all a lot of modern digital cameras end up good for.

Modern consumer electronics are engineered down to a finite life, with inbuilt obsolescence.

Early DSLR's with low resolution sensors, soon surpassed by that of cheaper newer compacts, don't have the same functionality that you got from say an old Nikormat, that might have been old, but with decent glass in the front and decent film in the back, could take photos every bit as good as the last of the line F4's; and that presumes, of course, that the 'classic' Digital remains serviceable, and doesn't have some fault or flaw that renders it useless, like a model specific Lithion battery, that's dead as a dodo, and obsolete in the catalogs.

More likely then to trend towards static display 'obje-da', rather than used functional picture making tools; it's likely that the 'appeal' of a classic camera is more likely to be purely aesthetic, rather than function, and the cameras that acquire classic appeal, will be those that are aesthetically more striking, rather than the ones that had functional novelty or appeal.
 
the Leica Digilux 2 already has a bit of a cult following & still sells for good money even now & its almost 10 years old :thumbs:
 
X100 for sure, great time to buy as well, with the X100S finally being in regular stock there have been a lot for sale lately, prices appear to be lower now than when I was looking for one a few months ago. A lot of people prefer the look and feel of the X100 sensor to the X100S, so I think it will always be in demand and become a classic.

Not sure about the D90, it's kept good value, but then the D50 held a similar position until not all that long ago (I guess the AF motor helps) but has finally faded away. I would guess the D7000 will be next in line to take over in the longevity stakes.

I'm interested in what happens to the RX1, not many sold so I wonder if anyone else will attempt something similar. If it ends up being alone in the FF compact market it could become a classic.
 
Last edited:
Nikon d200.

Incredibly strong, usable, dependable, no nonsense DSLR.
 
Teflon Mike is right without any doubt in my mind.
I don't say that particularly from a nostalgic point of view:
I too have very recently switched to digital & I see so many advantages, but all our cameras will be obsolete/outdated/incompatible way before we hope (given the cost)!
Classics in the past were still equally as useable & useful as whatever the new-fangled gadget of the day was.
 
I'm with Teflon Mike on this. Can't see any digital cameras being collectible in the future. The rate of product replacement these days is such that todays technology is considered old and out of date within three years. There's also far more to go wrong than on a simple film slr, and although modern electronics are very reliable, when they go wrong, it's unlikely to be repairable especially at home.
I still have my first digital camera from 2002, and although it works just fine, operation is very slow, the screen is tiny, it only goes up to 400 Iso and it's damn noisy at that. And in 10 years time, I'll probably be saying the same thing about my D700.
And given that camera batteries are often unique to a particular model, or maybe a few at best, and then replaced after a few years, then unless you stock up on batteries, or AA battery holders (if indeed you can get them for your camera) then you're not going to be using many current digital cameras in a few years time.
 
I'm with Teflon Mike on this. Can't see any digital cameras being collectible in the future. The rate of product replacement these days is such that todays technology is considered old and out of date within three years. There's also far more to go wrong than on a simple film slr, and although modern electronics are very reliable, when they go wrong, it's unlikely to be repairable especially at home.
I still have my first digital camera from 2002, and although it works just fine, operation is very slow, the screen is tiny, it only goes up to 400 Iso and it's damn noisy at that. And in 10 years time, I'll probably be saying the same thing about my D700.
And given that camera batteries are often unique to a particular model, or maybe a few at best, and then replaced after a few years, then unless you stock up on batteries, or AA battery holders (if indeed you can get them for your camera) then you're not going to be using many current digital cameras in a few years time.

I'm afraid this is bang on, even the ones that seem unique now (x100) will be replaced by something that just does it all better.
 
*cough* D300s *cough*

Classic or not, it most definitely will be in the legends class...
 
I would also add the canon 20 DA, to my knowledge the first DSLR supplied optimised for astrophotography.
 
Whilst not groundbreaking in terms of design or style, the Canon 300D should be in any museum for bringing digital SLR photography in at an affordable price bracket - beating Nikon' D70 to the market as well.
 
I'm with Teflon Mike on this. Can't see any digital cameras being collectible in the future.

OH! I think that there may actually be quite a LOT of 'collectible' digital cameras... I just don't think that there will be the same enthusiasm (or even possibility) for USING them.

There are people who collect Bakelite Brownies, or novelty 110 cartridge cameras; I even recall a magazine article concerning the merits of the obsolete Disc-Camera as a collectible classic.

Thing is, that the features that are deemed to be important, to a collector in such situations where the camera has no intrinsic value left as a picture-maker, is often little more than asthetic; what it looks like; whether its a rare white Bakalite Brownie, or a pink special addition Barbi Disc Camera or an Action Man 'Spy' 110 cartridge. Whether it has distinct defining 'fasion features' like an old bellows camera or a chrome and leatherette Cannon.

These sort of things will be more important, than whether the camera was the first to offer a 100x zoom range, or inbuilt filters feature, or was the first interchangeable lens mirrorless Full-Frame digi, etc etc etc.

Saturation marketing, now; the number of 'toy' cameras, from My Little Pony movie studio, through, Finding Nemo underwater compact; ASDA has a huge display of 'Special Eddition; I think it was Nikon compacts a while back, celerbrating different charecters from unheard of UK Soap-Opera!

These sort of 'special eddition' and novelty cameras, are the ones that are more likely, I think, to have future collector appeal, and the more valuable ones, will be that unpopular charecter from that short-lived soap's camera, that no-one bought, to make up the 'set', like Pokemon cards!

Look at film era cameras, (as in when there was no alternative to it, clarification for Steve!) 'Classics', tend to be the cameras that still have functional value; that can still be used to take pictures; 35mm & 120 roll film, and as often as not, the ones that offer something functionally worth-while, and intrinsically 'better' than you'd get in a new camera.

I mean; Entry Level digital crop sensor SLR, now, what £300? You can pick up a high-end old 35mm SLR that has full-frame resolution, for £50 or so. Yup; films expensive, but, £250 saving buys a lot of the stuff. And you can go use it, and potentially get high end quality pics.

I have a couple of 35mm compacts; sort of thing you could probably pick up for £2 in a charity shop. My XA2, an acknowledged classic, twenty years ago; high quality lens and good metering system, took SLR quality rivaling pictures in a lot of situations, but tiny and unobtrusive brilliant for candids. Camera I could still load with film, and exploit to get FF-Digital quality pics from something barely the size of a fag-packet!

These are 'Drivers' cameras; they joy in them coming from them doing something well, and being a joy to use.

You can still get 110 cartridges... if you hunt hard enough; and I believe that there are still a couple of stockists of APS, but you cant get disc film (AFAIK) and 120 rolls have to be trimmed in a changing bag to go into 127 cameras.

These MIGHT still be used, with greater or lesser degrees of success or convenience; but significantly remain the preserve of display cabinet collector, rather than 'classic' camera user, as they don't have that same intrinsic functional value, or any particular 'advantage' over something contemporary. The appeal is mostly novelty and asthetic.

This is the way I see 'collectible' cameras going, more and more towards display cabinet novelties, and away from in the hand used picture takers.
 
The Sony DSC-R1 and the Fuji S5 Pro have a whiff of that cult following a bit like the Leica Digilux. Digital technology moves so fast now though that I can't see any of them really becoming 'classics' in the Leica M or Nikon F and OMD sense.
 
For me a classic camera is one that I would want to uses in years to come, I can honestly say I don’t think I would use a present DSLR in 10 years time (we’ll all be using Google Glasses by then). My Epson R-D1s on the other hand which is nearly a 10 years old is a camera is one I still use today.
 
Nikon D1 the first real pro digital camera, if any digital camera is a classic it must be this one.

I have just brought a mint one with all its boxes and accessories for £85, get them while there cheap.
 
Sigma DP1 with the Fovenon sensor and the Fuji S3/S5 for me.

Long term classic Digitals will be about cameras that captured light "differently"

Nick
 
I think that the 'quirky' camerea styles that were around at the early days of digital (like the Sony Mavicas) will be collectible purely for their curiosity value.

Not so sure if any of the dslr's will be of interst to future collectors, unless the are extremely rare or have a historical significance.
 
You can still get 110 cartridges... if you hunt hard enough

FYI Mike, Lomography have marketed a range of 110 cartridge film - B&W and colour - for a couple of years now. I've used the B&W in my Pentax Auto 110 and whilst not the most technically stunning film, it is more than acceptable given the tiny negative size.
 
What current cameras will become classics in the future, icons of style and design, groundbreaking technology perhaps? Leica no doubt and some of the other top end brands spring to mind but any suggestions for some more afforable models too?

I don't think anything ticks all the boxes to be honest. A lot of groundbreaking models, but given that product lifecycle is a fraction of what it was pre-digital and that residuals are hopelessly low, and a lot of the budget models are 'disposable' few, if any will become classics.

If I had to nominate a camera - the Pentax *istD - not a name you forget in a hurry:naughty:
 
I don't think anything ticks all the boxes to be honest. A lot of groundbreaking models, but given that product lifecycle is a fraction of what it was pre-digital and that residuals are hopelessly low, and a lot of the budget models are 'disposable' few, if any will become classics.

Quite true, some film cameras (e.g Pentax K1000 and LX [both 21 years]) were made and sold for sometimes decades and Nikon used to update their pro F series about every 9 years or so for example as they did the job they were designed for successfully. Now who knows of a digital from even 2003 still being manufactured and a pro Nikon model lasts what 3 - 4 years? Every digital is pretty much obsolete when released anyway as theres always something new in the pipeline thats different or better etc for the next model.

Whilst I can see some digitals becoming 'classics' for groundbreaking new features, I can only see them being museum pieces rather than for actual work as there will always be something further on thats better in terms of resolution, noise, sensitivity etc.
 
Back
Top