Fuji x100/S/T/F Owners Thread

Thanks David, that sounds more like it :D
 
Mr Perceptive said:
Treated the 'old' X100 to a day out yesterday, despite its speed and the fact that the EVF doesn't give a true reflection of the image to be acquired, its a lovely thing to use.


170222 Oil and Grease by Mr Perceptive X100, on Flickr
Click to expand...
I loved that about the original x100 - if I took an image that looked decent in the EVF it always looked great once on a proper screen!
 
Does anyone use the round camera rings rather than the triangular ones and if so can you point me in the right direction.
 
Quickly took canera out whilst on dog walk. I've not changed anything in camera yer everything is factory set. Here's the digital teleconvertor that people have been asking about. 2017_0224_10474200.jpeg2017_0224_10474900.jpeg2017_0224_10475400.jpeg
 
Re. the first set of three (river scene) there does seem to be a change of exposure between them
 
I had to re-list my X100T in classified due to a time waster on Ebay - go grab a bargain!
 
Thunderbird010 said:
Does anyone use the round camera rings rather than the triangular ones and if so can you point me in the right direction.
Click to expand...

I tried to fit an Artist and Artisan strap last night, this has rings and the strap is suitable for Leica etc... it didn't fit as the metal was too thick.
 
wuyanxu said:
Is there noticeable difference between using this and cropping the RAW file in post?
Click to expand...
Don't know as yer as I've only sent them from Camera to phone and lightroom hasn't released the update for raw files yet so I'm just shooting in jpeg at the minute.
 
Dork Knight said:
I tried to fit an Artist and Artisan strap last night, this has rings and the strap is suitable for Leica etc... it didn't fit as the metal was too thick.
Click to expand...
That's my problem I've seen loads of round lug rings but some maybe to thick.
 
Cordweaver supplies split rings with his straps. If you ask nicely he might sell you a couple, or at least tell you what size he uses.

https://www.cordweaver.co.uk/faq

I've used them with a Fuji X30 and X-E2S in the past and they fitted OK. In fact I might have one here somewhere but whilst I could measure the diameter easily enough I don't think I could accurately measure the thickness.

AL
 
Last edited:
This thread title need amending to include the F

Anyway..

Took a few to show the Teleconverter in action, Also with the digital teleconverter when the Physical Tele is fitted.
The digital tele changes when the TCL is fitted to give 70mm and 100mm focal length

1, Just the tele fitted
X100f with TeleConverter by Trevor, on Flickr

2, Tele and digital 70mm converter
X100f with TeleConverter and digital 70mm by Trevor, on Flickr

3, Tele and digital 100mm converter
X100f with TeleConverter and digital 70mm by Trevor, on Flickr
X100f with TeleConverter and digital 100mm by Trevor, on Flickr
 
Last edited:
@Philx1979

Can you edit the thread title to include the F please.
 
The output looks lovely and detailed, what's it like on a pc with the full size version?
 
trevorbray said:
And now high ISO 2500

KalmKithchenCafe by Trevor, on Flickr
Click to expand...


On my X-T2, decent images at 12,800 are possible, expecially using ACROS, but the scene needs a decent dynamic range to get good results. Since the F has the same sensor and processing engine, I think you'll find you can push the ISO a lot further than 2500
 
Greggster said:
The output looks lovely and detailed, what's it like on a pc with the full size version?
Click to expand...

On my Mac with only 20inch screen it's pretty impressive. Of course there must be some impact due to interpolation. But I'd happily print A3 (not that I've got a large printer)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top