I've seen a number of comparisons online between these two lenses. There's a fair price difference between the two, therefore would I be disappointed with the 50-230 ?
Optically you won't be disappointed because it is a great lens with very little weight. These can be found at a very cheap price second hand. For me I want the 55-200 because the lens feel better in the hand, but it weights more then the 50-230.
These days I struggle with a lens without an aperture ring. I just about tolerate the 27mm, but even that frustrates me as I instinctively grasp the lens barrel. Optically I found the 50-230 very good but I had to put a little more work into the raw files to get the same "punch".
I've tried both, and would suggest not trying out the 55-200 before the 50-230, because then you will notice a big difference in every way. But, in it's own right, the 50-230 is a decent lens.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.