First week with mirrorless

EspressoJunkie

Suspended / Banned
Messages
2,886
Name
Greg
Edit My Images
Yes
Well, I’ve been using the A6000 for over a week now, so I think it’s time to give some feedback on how I’m finding it, and the whole shift to mirrorless in general. I have a feeling this could be a long post, and I’ll probably ramble a bit…..


Prior to this switch I was using some fantastic kit (5Dmkiii, Sigma 35 1.4, Canon 85 1,8, and Samyang 14mm 2.8), and it was providing some stunning images. How did I end up with this lovely gear? I, like many people, suffered from G.A.S, which was made worse by landing a job in my work’s photography studio a couple of years ago. I genuinely had envisioned myself shooting professionally outside of work as well, and this allowed me to justify the spending. However, it gradually became apparent that I lack both the time (3 children!) and more importantly the motivation to pursue photography outside work as anything other than a hobby.

I also have become less obsessed (and I was obsessed before, believe me) with ultimate image quality, and while I appreciate that quality is still important, I don’t need to see every detail perfectly at 100%, and a bit of noise here and there doesn’t bother me like it used to. My pictures are for me and my family, and usually end up on FB, forums, and Flickr. I’m not chasing the perfect photo, and as much as I still want to improve, I have realized that I don’t need thousands of pounds worth of gear to do this, clearly it would have been nice to keep what I had, the simple fact is that the money that I made from downsizing is far better spent on my wife and kids, than on a brilliant camera, that spent most of its life in a bag. That rather nicely brings me onto the other main reason. Size. Basically the Mkiii (even with just the Sigma 35) was simply not getting used because it was cumbersome to bring out, especially with all the other stuff required for a day out with 3 kids. I wanted something smaller that would be easier to carry with me on family days out etc.

So, I settled on the Sony A6000 which seemed to give the best balance between features and price. I’ve been shooting with it for a week or so, and so far I’m glad to say that I’m actually pleasantly surprised at just how capable a camera it is. The ergonomics, while certainly different from a DSLR, are still functional enough to provide a decent level of control. Some things, such as selecting AF modes are certainly slower than a DSLR, but the vast majority of things are within a couple of button presses. There is a fairly good level of button customization as well. The tilting screen is extremely handy, although it’s a bit rubbish in bright sunlight

Size wise, it’s small, especially after coming from a 5Dmkiii and still using a D3x daily in work, but this is a huge advantage for me. With the kit lens attached, I can literally fit it into the pocket of my cargo shorts, so while it’s still not a complete pocket camera, it is much more manageable. I can currently fit the camera, wide angle prime, kit lens, and filter into the small Lowepro bag which barely held my Mkiii and one prime.

Image quality is pretty impressive as well. The kit lens isn’t the greatest, but if there’s no pixel peeping it holds up well. With a good prime (Samyang 12mm) the quality is great, and shows what the sensor is capable of. Noise at higher ISO is ok, certainly no where near the Mkiii, but this is to be expected. Dynamic range is good, and colours are great. I do miss that ‘Canon feel’ SOOC but the RAWs have plenty of scope for processing. AF is pretty good as well (and was one of my main reasons for choosing the A6000). As mentioned its not a fast to change AF modes or points, and the AFC sometimes gets a little confused, but the face detection is great, and 11 FPS certainly helps for getting shots of the kids running about.


Basically it comes down to this. Do I miss my Mkiii and wonderful primes? Of course I do, I was using some of the best kit money could buy, and in an ideal world I would still be using them. But do I feel that this camera will do everything I need it to at my level? I certainly do!
 
Similar reasons why I've now got a mft for personal use with kit lens.

Got tired of lugging around my lenses. I've also just started taking family photos in jpg cos I never find time to edit
 
Watching with interest. Although I don't have GAS too badly, I'm fed up with lugging a bloody heavy rucksack around and am starting to look elsewhere...
 
mirrorless has come on in leaps and bounds, I have settled on the EM5 and EPL5 although I did pick up a NEX 5N last week and that has really impressed me as a P&S style affair.

I love how quick AF is on mirrorless systems of late, so so fast.
 
Sorry guys but what is G.A.S
 
went through a similar thing around 18 months ago though my DSLR was on a much smaller budget range ( canon 500D, sigma 10-20, canon 70-200 L ( damn i miss the 10-20 ). sold it all up as i got fed up with lugging a great big bag and tripod around and switching lenses .
so sold it all up along with all the filters, flashguns and gubbins that went with it. got myself a little canvas shoulder camera bag and the Fuji X-E1 ( got it on the day on UK release too and paid a damn pretty penny for it with the single kit lens ).
time slowed down for me using the fuji. image quality was superb and photography moved back to the old days of shooting film where i took time over the shot a little more and thought about things.
Rather than go out and shoot off 200 shots and end up with 190 in the bin id shoot maybe 20-30 and pretty much all were keepers.
However due to a change towards portrait shooting and the whole speed and ease of shooting with a canon ( literally pick it up switch on and shoot) plus the mentaility of clients ( big camera, big lens = pro photographer ) i sold the fuji after around 6 months of shooting pleasure and im not back to a back breaking canon and lenses ( minus the beloved 10-20 and 70-200 L ) and instead stuck with the 18-135 STM a sigma 70-300 and a nifty fifty.
better camera body with the 60D but a definite step backwards with the glass .. lesson learned i guess and will be a long time before i get the chance to get the kind of lenses i had before
 
Funny isn't it, a lot of us seem to have gone from great kit to useable kit, and the gap between to two is getting smaller
Allan
 
I'm certainly interested in the A6000, I've got a Nikon D90 and a Fuji X-E1 and finding the IQ great on the X-E1 but the AF is not fast enough for pictures of the kids when they're moving about. From what I'm hearing it sounds like the A6000 might be the best on the front at the moment.

Good write up, thanks.
 
Funny isn't it, a lot of us seem to have gone from great kit to useable kit, and the gap between to two is getting smaller
Allan

That's right. It's all about the picture as a whole. The emotional reaction to it. Whether it 'speaks' to the viewer. None of my friends, family or clients look at each pixel.
 
With all these MFT shots I keep looking at I am wondering why I went and got a Nikon D7000 and lenses when possibly a good MFT set up would of worked and been half the weight
 
Exactly the same as me!
I was looking at the Panasonic G6 and currently you get a free lens if you buy it new. Costs about the same as my D7000 and 35mm is worth used!
 
I was looking at the em-10.. Then the focus speed of the a6000 caught my eye but I need to read more
 
Watching with interest. Although I don't have GAS too badly, I'm fed up with lugging a bloody heavy rucksack around and am starting to look elsewhere...
EXACTLY the reason I bought an Olympus E-PL5!
 
In a bag that is not deep enough to fit the 1dsmk2 w/ 24-105 I have...

Em5 w/ 17mm
Epl5 w/ lensbaby
60mm 2.8
40-150mm
Fl36 flash

Sony nex 5n w/18-55

Then various batteries/accessories

It's just so compact, and without day to day loss of IQ/speed/function.

My Oly fisheye body cap should hopefully arrive tomorrow, really looking forward to it the 140' fov suits me compared to the 180 I have previously been used to, especially for video.
 
I gave up my Nikon D7000, Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8 and other good lenses for a Mirrorless camera.
The smaller size and weight makes a massive difference.
No regrets so far.
Once Mirrorless crack AF speeds and tracking to DSLR levels or better I don't see many advantages for DSLR's.
Could be the death of them.
 
With all these MFT shots I keep looking at I am wondering why I went and got a Nikon D7000 and lenses when possibly a good MFT set up would of worked and been half the weight

or less.
 
I bought a GX7 recently and I think it's a good camera. It impresses me with its 1/8000 max shutter speed, electronic shutter and high ISO ability.

It's well worth a look IMVHO.
 
That's right. It's all about the picture as a whole. The emotional reaction to it. Whether it 'speaks' to the viewer. None of my friends, family or clients look at each pixel.

This is so true. As I've said before the only people who pick up on anything at a pixel level are a certain breed of photographers. I used to be that guy, but since stopping pixel peeping I genuinely enjoy my images and photography as a whole much more :)
 
Out of interest, and I say this not to provoke, do you not find the higher quality lenses give something to the image in the manner they resolve detail, even when the image is scaled down, that is lacking with lower quality kit?

Reason I ask is that I've been moving through a variety of kit recently, and (and I appreciate this is probably subjective) different lenses seem to produce different image characteristics. So the detail from a zeiss 16-80 seemed to hold together better at 25% viewing than from the 18-55 kit lens, which is again substantially better than the Sigma 18-250 I've just bought for travel (I may well take the 18-55 for this reason, negating the travel benefits of the Sigma). There's 'good enough', but there's also 'OK but a little disappointing' and that's what I'm facing, even though one might argue that differences should not be visible between the lenses at 1200:800px.
 
Back
Top