First Macro lens

trapper501

Suspended / Banned
Messages
1,175
Name
Nick
Edit My Images
Yes
Well it will be second I suppose, as I've started with the Canon 500D close up filter that I teamed with a borrowed 70-200 f4L

After my experience at the TP Lakeside meet I realise I should be looking at flash, but I'd also like my own lens.

So I'm thinking the Canon EF 100 f 2.8 Macro, but the alternatives seem to be the tamron 90 and the Sigma 105. If I'm going third party I could afford a longer lens like the sigma 150 I suppose. (I can't afford the Canon 180 Macro !)

A couple of the canon 100s have sold on here recently for just over £300.

I was thinking about whether to start off by just getting flash set up for my current rig, but I think I'd like the marumi ring flash which won't be happy on the 77mm 500D.

I can go for just an off the camera flash set up but with a 200mm lens I think I'll have to make my own bracket.
 
The latest edition of PhotoPlus has a feature / review on various Macro lenses - might be worth picking up a copy and having a read through, might help you decide :thumbs:

We have the Sigma 50mm Macro and are very pleased with it. Possibly having a bit more reach would be nice, but at present for us it's not worth the extra money. :thumbs:
 
I second andyred's comments about the informative review in PhotoPlus. I was quite sure about buying the Canon EF 100mm, and while I havent quite kicked it into touch completely, the Tamron SP AF 90mm looks a viable contender in most aspects including price. Id be interested to know what you all think and decide.
Cheers
Trev
 
The Sigma 150mm and Tamron SP AF 90mm are both outstanding macro lenses!
Have a look through the many reviews on the internet (ephotozine reviews are excellent) and that should help you make up your mind.

Generally, unless you're going for the wide-angle look, the longer the focal length the better for macro lenses. I picked up a Sigma 180mm second-hand for £295 and it still amazes me at its sharpness.
 
Back
Top