60p is a bargain.
Expect postage costs to magically rise in eBay when sellers try to recoup the extra costs.
steve_v said:Whilst I could understand why you would like it to be so I find it unlikely that eBay sellers would be charging for posting at a loss, there's really nothing magic about it
Steve
Regarding the Royal Fail, I rest my case: http://www.talkphotography.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=398192
Tomorrow I'll be posting three items and all of them will be recorded delivery. Since my confidence for the Royal Fail is low as it were, I wonder how that will go. Bear in mind that the last four lost items as already mentioned by me two months ago were all recorded delivery - and they still show up on the tracking system as "delivery in progress".
Trying to get compensation for the loss is like trying to get blood out of a stone!
Ian D J said:Regarding the Royal Fail, I rest my case: http://www.talkphotography.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=398192
Tomorrow I'll be posting three items and all of them will be recorded delivery. Since my confidence for the Royal Fail is low as it were, I wonder how that will go. Bear in mind that the last four lost items as already mentioned by me two months ago were all recorded delivery - and they still show up on the tracking system as "delivery in progress".
Trying to get compensation for the loss is like trying to get blood out of a stone!
Ian D J said:Holy thread revival Batman . . . but I am now convinced that the Royal Fail has lost all what remaining commonsense they have got left.
Earlier on this morning, I stepped outdoors to get the newspapers and noticed two envelopes sitting on the doorstep fluttering about in the wind. One contained the monthly bank statement and the other one containing details of a follow up doctor's appointment for my mother.
Why hadn't he bothered to post them through the letterbox? Anyone could have pinched those envelopes and steal the details on them. Not very impressed and will catch the postman when he does his rounds on Monday about his laziness - not to mention his ignorance of the Data Protection Act.
Then there was that occasion last week when one of the letters posted to me was meant for next door. I now know their surname (never knew that before).
Maybe he read the dog biting thread?

What has the possibility of the postie not knowingly dropped envelopes on your doorstep and a wrongly delivered letter got to do with the data protection act?
Would have thought it'd be obvious. Both envelopes were addressed to me, and leaving them lying on the doorstep mean anyone could have just taken them.
It still smacks of carelessness to me.
Maybe the postie dropped them by accident but whatever the scenario of them not being delivered, I fail to see what it has to do with the data protection act.
Like I said, they should take more care when doing their job (have amended my last comment with that to mind).
But now all my posts look disjointed.
Ian D J said:Holy thread revival Batman . . . but I am now convinced that the Royal Fail has lost all what remaining commonsense they have got left.
Earlier on this morning, I stepped outdoors to get the newspapers and noticed two envelopes sitting on the doorstep fluttering about in the wind. One contained the monthly bank statement and the other one containing details of a follow up doctor's appointment for my mother.
Why hadn't he bothered to post them through the letterbox? Anyone could have pinched those envelopes and steal the details on them. Not very impressed and will catch the postman when he does his rounds on Monday about his laziness - not to mention his ignorance of the Data Protection Act.
Then there was that occasion last week when one of the letters posted to me was meant for next door. I now know their surname (never knew that before).
When you say fluttering about in the wind were they under any thing? Because if it was windy surely they would have blown away?!