Film question

Barney

Suspended / Banned
Messages
3,043
Name
Wayne
Edit My Images
No
When you put a roll of film in a camera must you use it all on the same day?

I suspect not, and if that is the case how long does it last?

Is it acceptable to shoot a roll over 2-3 weeks, and if so is there a downside to using the roll of film in this manner?
 
Many of us have taken a year or more to finish a 36 exposure film, on other occasions we might shoot several rolls in a day. But yes, taking weeks or even months is ok, but don't leave the loaded camera in strong sunlight and hot environment, as it will not help the longevity of the film and the strong light might find the weaknesses of old seals in the camera body.
All film wrappings have an expiry date for the film, to give you an idea. In many cases we can use film that is long past its expiry date if it has been stored in a cool environment - some of us have a section of a fridge or even a whole one, loaded with film stock, to keep it fresh for future use.
 
I found an old camera of mine in a drawer and saw that it had film in it so I processed it and it had photos of my kids from about 12 years before. Most of the shots came out okay.
 
Phew, that is good news,

I was panicking in case the film started to deteriorate or something when opened.

Thanks for replies
 
Must finish - no. But (I always have buts :)) it depends on the film. Colour films decay more rapidly than black and white, but we're not talking in terms of hours. As a council of perfection, Ilford used (and for all I know, Harman still do) recommend processing PanF within half an hour of exposure. I admit I never have managed that. The shortest time between exposure and development I managed was when demonstrating slide processing at an evening class when I exposed a cassette and then processed it.

I didn't even manage that turn around when I used Polaroid slide film (35mm).
 
Last edited:
Many of us have taken a year or more to finish a 36 exposure film, on other occasions we might shoot several rolls in a day. But yes, taking weeks or even months is ok, but don't leave the loaded camera in strong sunlight and hot environment, as it will not help the longevity of the film and the strong light might find the weaknesses of old seals in the camera body.
All film wrappings have an expiry date for the film, to give you an idea. In many cases we can use film that is long past its expiry date if it has been stored in a cool environment - some of us have a section of a fridge or even a whole one, loaded with film stock, to keep it fresh for future use.
I have a bunch of (now expired) film in my freezer that I bought when the prices were better and the films were in date. Now that they are technically out of date I tend to finish them on the same day as I load them (120 film 12 0r 15 shots per roll) and get them processed in the same week. If I don't finish a film on one outing as was the case this week then I will wrap the film back in soft cloth and a freezer bag and keep it in the fridge until my next outing. This is probably a bit overkill but I believe that having kept it in a freezer for some time I don't like to risk leaving it too long between bringing it into normal temps and developing it just in case.
 
........you can always rewind the film and put in the next camera, in the past have used the same 36 exp film in 3 cameras.

Very true. I've often swapped film to a different camera.
 
what is the process?

I would end up rewinding into the canister or opening the door and flashing the first two or three images if I guessed.
 
what is the process?

I would end up rewinding into the canister or opening the door and flashing the first two or three images if I guessed.

It's quite easy to do. No rocket science involved. Make sure you note your frame number, then rewind as normal. You will feel tension, and then the film release. Stop then. But there are simple tools available to extract the leader from a film cannister if you rewind it completely. I should point out though that it's not an exact science, and there is always a risk that there may be some loss. However, after that it's simply a question of reloading it and firing off the shutter with the lens cap on. Once you've arrived at the correct exposure usually take an extra shot to prevent overlap. Theoretically, that should do it. :D
 
It's quite easy to do. No rocket science involved. Make sure you note your frame number, then rewind as normal. You will feel tension, and then the film release. Stop then. But there are simple tools available to extract the leader from a film cannister if you rewind it completely. I should point out though that it's not an exact science, and there is always a risk that there may be some loss. However, after that it's simply a question of reloading it and firing off the shutter with the lens cap on. Once you've arrived at the correct exposure usually take an extra shot to prevent overlap. Theoretically, that should do it. :D
You had me convinced I could do it then until I got to "Theoretically". Ha Ha
 
You had me convinced I could do it then until I got to "Theoretically". Ha Ha
As Vincent said easy peasy....just to add:- I use the belt and braces method i.e. lens cap on, then set your camera to manual and set 1/1000 sec and lens at f16, then hold your camera to your body to cover viewfinder and also cover the lens cap with my hand, then wind on and no way can light get in.(y)
 
... and if your camera is aperture priority, remember to set it to a manual setting (possibly X/Sync), wind forward with lens cap as above AND THEN SET IT BACK TO A!!!

Speaking from (repeated) experience, obviously!
 
Changing film into different cameras is also useful if e.g. you have say taken 24 shots in your camera and have just bought a S/H camera, then just swop the film over to the S/H camera to use the film up and check the camera is working properly.
Just to add:- use my belt and braces method just in case the bought S/H camera has light leaks e.g. camera back seals and definately don't do it in bright sunshine.
 
Last edited:
www.ephotozine.com/article/bob-dylan-makes-comeback-12615

no need to rush

31 year old images of Bob Dylan developed​


A film roll containing photographs of Bob Dylan has been unearthed and developed for the first time 31 years after it was exposed, thanks to UK based Ilford Photo. The pictures demonstrate the capacity of old film technology to store images perfectly, giving rise to the question of whether digital pictures will last this long.

Press Release:

Bob Dylan has made another critically acclaimed comeback, although this time it is his image rather than his music that is causing the excitement. 31 years after a concert in Fort Worth, Texas pictures of Dylan taken using Ilford HP5 black and white film have only now been developed after gathering dust for over three decades.

Unlike Dylan, now 68, the photographs show no apparent signs of ageing and provide a crystal clear view of Dylan on stage during the 1978 performance. For the photographer, Mark Estabrook, the fact that the pictures survived demonstrates the archival properties of traditional photography compared with digital files:

The film lay dormant and undeveloped at various room temperatures until I discovered them when moving house recently,” He said. “I asked Ilford Photo’s technical team how to develop the film and when I came out of the darkroom I was amazed how well the images had been preserved. It was as if I shot the show yesterday, with superb grain detail.

I have used various digital storage, from floppy disks to flash drives, since 1982 and a hard drive would never have lasted that long, let alone an inkjet print. The fact these pictures survived in the condition that they did is testament to the quality and longevity of silver halide photography. As I tell my fellow photographers: try that with a hard drive.

Ilford Photo has been manufacturing photographic products, from film to darkroom chemicals, since 1879 and the company remains one of the few brands surviving from the halcyon days of darkroom photography.

Marketing Director, Steven Brierley believes that finds like the Dylan pictures are helping analogue photography experience a comeback of its own: “Images like these demonstrate the impact black and white pictures have to a new generation of photographers, as well as their capacity to last.

There is a romance and an verve to darkroom photography and real silver-gelatin prints that is actually heightened by the predominance of digital. It’s an ethereal quality that cannot be matched with digital prints,” he added.

The Bob Dylan film was kept in the original Ilford Photo tin alongside shots of seventies rock and roll band Little Feat. Now an airline pilot, Mark Estabrook was a noteworthy rock and roll photographer during the seventies and the pictures will be included in a new book of music photography planned for publication next year.
 
Back
Top