Female Body Builder - First Shoot - Advice Please!

snoop69

Suspended / Banned
Messages
2,451
Name
Paul
Edit My Images
Yes
Hi guys,

Im preparing to do a body builder shoot & was wondering if anyone had any
experience in this field.

Do I treat the shoot just as a 'normal' portrait shoot or should I be setting up
differently to try & show muscle definition etc?

Thanks in advance.
 
Tell her she looks beautiful so she doesn't clock you one lol !!!!

Think you have to really define the muscles in a shoot like this or it would / could just look like a normal shoot
 
Not photographed a female body builder myself (shudder) but it's all about the light baby. If you want a dramatic shot with lots of definition and shadow on the muscles you need to go for harsh directional lighting.
 
Thanks guys for the replies.

Would you suggest keeping the backdrop unlit or raise the power on the
model light?

The backdrop is a white continuos job of the vinyl variety.

Along with a huge softbox & backdrop lighting there is also a hairlight
available. Would that be of any use?

Thanks again.
 
As Flash P says above take a look at McNally. Don't know if the blog is the same but in his latest book he has a body builder example of how different light and light modifiers massivley affect the outcome. It all depends how you want them to look. If you use a softbox she might look 'prettier' (;)) but there will be much less definition and shadow on the muscles etc. What is the effect you're going for.
 
As Flash P says above take a look at McNally. Don't know if the blog is the same but in his latest book he has a body builder example of how different light and light modifiers massivley affect the outcome. It all depends how you want them to look. If you use a softbox she might look 'prettier' (;)) but there will be much less definition and shadow on the muscles etc. What is the effect you're going for.

I couldnt find any bodybuilder pics on the blog I looked at (maybe the wrong Mcnally)
but I did find some pics through his older posts.

Here is something similar to what I hope to achieve.
 
I would think directional lighting to get te shadows in the defenition on the muscles.

Apologies for being a novice but I guess that would be direct light with
no softbox?

Do i set the light straight on or at 45degs as per the norm?
 
Snoop take a stroll through Lighting 101 for some help. Direct light should be at whatever angle works best for the pose you are thinking to use. You might want to consider two lights or a light + reflector to light both sides of her to exagerate her form.
 
Snoop take a stroll through Lighting 101 for some help. Direct light should be at whatever angle works best for the pose you are thinking to use. You might want to consider two lights or a light + reflector to light both sides of her to exagerate her form.

Thanks V8, Lighting 101 & You Tube have been very informative.

I notice that due to oils etc, there are what looks like overexposed areas
(I guess I should do alright with my track record :lol:) Is this something I should
be aiming for to exaggerate the shadows?
 
Do search for 'jason cole' in the nude section, search for a post on how to accentuate the body muscles and there is a thread that will help you to achieve your mission.

I think it is mainly having light at the sides of the body.
 
Personally I would head in a low-key direction if I were given the job, but yes the highlights and shadows will exaggerate the body toning (which is what most body-builders are concerned about). I would still use either soft-boxes or shoot through brollies rather than bare flashes, or your highlights will be blown I would think.
 
I would not light that bg and keep her fairly far forward to get it to go grey/black

use hard light from the sides

defo check out strobist he did something similar a few weeks back and gives great details
 
I would not light that bg and keep her fairly far forward to get it to go grey/black

use hard light from the sides

defo check out strobist he did something similar a few weeks back and gives great details

^^^ That's how I would do it. I think that's fairly conventional BB style.

The darker background will stop the really shiny bits of muscle definition from disappearing.
 
Hi I used to take pics for Body Builing Monthly when I was alive. If they are posed shots I always went for slightly low key and even lighting, a top light is very handy, then one harsh brolly with a gold reflector about 15deg to the front of the model and very slightly higher than the pose. I used to like the brolly exposure about 3/4 of a stop higher than the other lights. Use this as a base and experiment. I had the disadvantage of using film.
Best part of shooting bodybuilders is that you don't have to pose them. They know what they want.
Lot's of luck.
 
I would not light that bg and keep her fairly far forward to get it to go grey/black

That was my thoughts. Will try & get the studio to let me have the black
backdrop.

If they are posed shots I always went for slightly low key and even lighting, a top light is very handy, then one harsh brolly with a gold reflector about 15deg to the front of the model and very slightly higher than the pose. I used to like the brolly exposure about 3/4 of a stop higher than the other lights. Use this as a base and experiment. I had the disadvantage of using film.
Best part of shooting bodybuilders is that you don't have to pose them. They know what they want.
Lot's of luck.

Thank you, very helpful indeed.

Personally I would head in a low-key direction if I were given the job, but yes the highlights and shadows will exaggerate the body toning (which is what most body-builders are concerned about). I would still use either soft-boxes or shoot through brollies rather than bare flashes, or your highlights will be blown I would think.

Thank you very much.

I will post my results (hopefully) by the weekend :lol:
 
Back
Top