You are correct (according to IUPAC standards) in the spelling, but I can't adapt to the American spelling of sulphur and associated compounds. Let's keep fotography traditional...![]()
You cant be as bad as me, I check posts three times, then push the button and then end up editing for the next ten minutes.I am dyslexic so í tend to use anything that comes into my head at the time. I am absolutely useless at proof reading.
you have missed out a full stpAnd even then your edit isn't grammatically correct![]()
![]()
I am a literature man myself, was always good at memorizing stuff, my record so far is 53 pages... something The Third.And in my last post, to be accurate the full stop should have been placed before the close bracket, not after it.
I write as someone with O level English language and a NUJMB pass in Use of English.
(Which can be paraphrased as "pretentious pedant".)
The Formulae I used is so called Kodak fixer and the liter is good for 25 x 80 inch of film, think the stuff was 40 quid all told but should be good for 100 rolls, the next and subsequent 100 rolls will only be about seven quid per batch.I've never mixed my own fixer as, when I last looked at the costings, it seems to be more expensive than buying a 5 litre container at the best available price, then diluting it 1+4 for film and 1+9 for paper.
The formulae I have seen for self-mixed fixer seem to assume that the stuff is used as "stock" without further dilution.
However I might have misunderstood the intended dilution or the costs.
Not really, but then you don't have to climb Mount Everest but some do.In theory, making your own paper (well, voating your own paper) isn't difficult. I know there are ways of making your own paper as well. You just have to decide where you draw the line. It's like a home made meal - do you necessarily have to grow your own veg and raise your own livestock?
Not really, but then you don't have to climb Mount Everest but some do.
It's not a cost thing though, I enjoyed making it. I am going to make my own camera, emulsion, developer and fixer then print it. I will probably buy the paper, don't know yet.
My wife has made her own craft paper (not for photography).In theory, making your own paper (well, coating your own paper) isn't difficult. I know there are ways of making your own paper as well. You just have to decide where you draw the line. It's like a home made meal - do you necessarily have to grow your own veg and raise your own livestock?
No problem Nigel, no offense taken, I have ventured into the lighting forum a couple of times and there you really do have to have thick skin.View: https://youtu.be/g3j9muCo4o0?si=d_yfQLINHtKzwgZ9
@Barney please don't take that as me making fun, it's more me being amazed by your seemingly boundless energy.
If you're enjoying doing all these things, then go for it! Your enthusiastic and enquiring posts about your adventures in film photography are making the F&C folder a very busy place, which is great.![]()
Nige (on the other forum we both post on) made his own art paper to ink jet print onto which looked rather good, not sure how well it would hold together for wet processing a silver print though I expect some do just because.My wife has made her own craft paper (not for photography).
So far the only coating either of us have done has been for cyanotypes and anthotypes,.
My wife's paper wouldn't have be good for prints either, too thick & uneven even if it held together through processing, Sometime I might try coating/printing on wood or china I just need to make up some liquid emulsion, once I finally finish my darkroom & master the printing skills!Nige (on the other forum we both post on) made his own art paper to ink jet print onto which looked rather good, not sure how well it would hold together for wet processing a silver print though I expect some do just because.
I have "The Darkroom Handbook" and in there the author(Knopf) provided examples of images printed onto stone, a wooden spoon and ceramics etc, It does not appear too difficult a process. He recommends a product by the name of "Liquid Light" and suggests that the more uneven the surface the better the effects can be.My wife's paper wouldn't have be good for prints either, too thick & uneven even if it held together through processing, Sometime I might try coating/printing on wood or china I just need to make up some liquid emulsion, once I finally finish my darkroom & master the printing skills!
Thanks, I've had a copy of the darkroom handbook for years, it might even be where I first came across liquid emulsion.I have "The Darkroom Handbook" and in there the author(Knopf) provided examples of images printed onto stone, a wooden spoon and ceramics etc, It does not appear too difficult a process. He recommends a product by the name of "Liquid Light" and suggests that the more uneven the surface the better the effects can be.
![]()
Rockland Liquid Light, 240ml
Designed to be used without Multigrade filters, Liquid Light has an average contrast of about 3.0. We think of it like liquid photographic paper but for making prints onto wood, glass, ceramics, plastics, china, fabric, metal, rock and much more. Liquid Light is natural to apply and is...firstcall-photographic.co.uk
There maybe other more cost effective suppliers, its just the first one I came across.
The coated product is just exposed under the enlarger as normal.