Thanks for the advice guys, I am conteplating getting the Raynox 250 as I prefer the idea of putting it on the front and not having to take the lens off to fit the entension tubes.
Do you have any personal experience with the raynox?
thanks
How much are you looking for it Richard if it is still forsale?
I do have a diopter filteralready but would also love to go much closer![]()
EHEM....we have a section for this chaps, that EXCLUDES dealing by PM! :nono:
Hoppy, suggest you start a post in classifieds for openess.
I am going to watch this as I fancy a raynox myself. I have a Nikon 105mm f2.8 macro lens which is superb but having used a dioptra filter on it I like the idea of going even closer.
That is another option should you want to just have a play, dioptra filters (they are just lenses that screw onto the filter thread) are quite good and very cheap without the loss of light problem you get with tubes. The raynox setup is just a much better version of the same.
Darren, get the kenko extension tubes they are awesome.
A quick shot with the 105 sigma 1.4 tc and full set of tubes handheld.
![]()
To the OP I have not had an issue with any of my lenses with the kenko extension tubes.
Richard......![]()
![]()