It's possible if the Exif data is still intact. Some people may have used the 'save for web' option to resize their images for posting, in which case the Exif data will have been stripped to minimise the size of the file.
Depends - one of the easiest way is with an exif information viewer - they can usually be found as plugins to your web browser - I use Google Chrome browser, and "Exif reader" - it's a bit flaky at times, but usually works - there's hundreds for IE8, and you'll probably be able to find a plugin for whatever browser you use - just google it!
I went down the Panda route. It works well, that is when there is EXIF data available. It's surprising how few shots on here that is. Lots of different reasons for this I'm sure.
Good to see yours is available, brilliant shot of the Short Eared Owl by the way.
It's possible if the Exif data is still intact. Some people may have used the 'save for web' option to resize their images for posting, in which case the Exif data will have been stripped to minimise the size of the file.
Removing Exif data is done not only to minimise the size of the file, but also to avoid sensitive data disclosure. For instance, cameras with built-in GPS, store the coordinates in the Exif data. If one takes a picture in his home and then publish it on the net, he can inadvertently expose his identity and address. There are even programs to clean photos before publication like the freewares BatchPurifier LITE and jStrip.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.